ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor練習テスト問題解答には更新された230問があります [Q75-Q91]

Share

ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor練習テスト問題解答には更新された230問があります

ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor問題集はISO 9001合格確定させる練習で230問があります


PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor 認定試験の出題範囲:

トピック出題範囲
トピック 1
  • ISO 9001 監査プログラムの管理: このトピックでは、QMS 監査プログラムを確立および管理する能力を評価します。
トピック 2
  • ISO 9001 監査の準備: このトピックでは、品質管理システム監査の準備に関連するサブトピックについて説明します。
トピック 3
  • ISO 9001 監査の終了: このトピックでは、QMS 監査の終了と監査フォローアップ活動の実施に焦点を当てています。
トピック 4
  • 監査の基本的な概念と原則: このトピックでは、QMS 監査に関連する主要な概念と原則の解釈と適用に関する質問が出ます。
トピック 5
  • 品質管理システムの基本原則と概念: このドメインの主な目的は、ISO 9001 の原則と概念を説明および適用するスキルを評価することです。
トピック 6
  • ISO 9001 監査の実施: QMS 監査を実施するスキルを評価します。

 

質問 # 75
Match each of the following statements into the table below to show whether they apply to first-party audits, second-party audits or third-party audits:

正解:

解説:

Explanation:

Table
Statement
First-party audits
Second-party audits
Third-party audits
The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited.
Yes
No
No
The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard.
No
No
Yes
The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability.
No
Yes
No
Here is a brief explanation of each statement:
The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited: This statement applies to first-party audits, also known as internal audits, where the organisation audits its own processes and activities to ensure conformity and improvement1. The organisation can decide the scope of the audit based on its own needs and objectives2. This statement does not apply to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier, or third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation. In these cases, the audit scope is determined by the customer or the certification body, respectively34.
The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard: This statement applies to third- party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation to verify that it meets the requirements of a specific standard, such as ISO 9001, and issues a certificate of conformity if the audit is successful34. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or second-party audits, where the outcome of the audit is not certification, but rather self-improvement or supplier qualification13.
The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability: This statement applies to second- party audits, where the customer audits the supplier to ensure that they are meeting the requirements specified in the contract, such as service or product quality, delivery, or performance34. The audit scope is usually focused on the specific aspects of the service or product that are of interest to the customer3. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or third-party audits, where the audit scope is broader and covers the entire quality management system or the relevant clauses of the standard14.


質問 # 76
Scenario 3:
Fin-Pro is a financial institution in Austria offering commercial banking, wealth management, and investment services. The company faced a significant loss of customers due to failing to improve service quality as they expanded.
To regain customer confidence, top management implemented a QMS based on ISO 9001. After a year, they contacted ACB, a local certification body, to pursue ISO 9001 certification.
The audit team was led by Emilia, an experienced lead auditor, and included three auditors. After an agreement was reached, ACB sent the audit objectives to the audit team.
The audit team began by gathering information about Fin-Pro's understanding of ISO 9001 requirements.
While reviewing documented information, they noticed missing records of training and awareness sessions. They conducted employee interviews to verify attendance.
The team also reviewed the organizational chart and job descriptions to confirm employee competence.
They observed the company's working environment (social, psychological, and physical conditions).
The audit team analyzed the evidence and prepared an audit report with findings and conclusions.
ACB sent the audit objectives to the audit team after an agreement was reached. Is this acceptable?

  • A. Yes, as long as the audit team leader approves.
  • B. Yes, the audit objectives should be known only after an agreement is reached.
  • C. No, only the auditee should know the audit objectives.
  • D. No, the audit objectives should be part of the audit offer.

正解:D

解説:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Clause References:
* ISO 19011:2018 (Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems), Clause 5.3 - Establishing the Audit Objectives
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.2 - Audit Planning
Why is the Correct Answer C?
* Audit objectives must be clearly defined in the audit offer to ensure that the scope, criteria, and purpose are agreed upon in advance.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 (which governs certification bodies) requires that audit objectives be established before the audit begins to ensure transparency and effectiveness.
* Sending audit objectives after an agreement has been reached could lead to misalignment between the auditee's expectations and the audit's purpose.
Why are the Other Options Incorrect?
* A (Audit objectives should be known only after agreement) # Incorrect because objectives must be pre-defined in the audit offer.
* B (Only the auditee should know the objectives) # Incorrect because both the auditor and auditee must align on objectives.
* D (Approval from the lead auditor is sufficient) # Incorrect because audit planning follows formal procedures defined by ISO/IEC 17021-1.


質問 # 77
To complete the non-conformity report, click on the blank section you want to complete so it is highlighted in red and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank section.

正解:

解説:


質問 # 78
Match the process descriptions below to the process names:

正解:

解説:

Explanation:
A white background with black text Description automatically generated


質問 # 79
During a third-party surveillance audit, the auditor finds that the management review meeting minutes record that the improvement actions set by the previous review have not been completed for a second year running. It states that a new Quality Manager has been brought in at the middle management level to rectify the situation.
You learn that top management is not involved in the QMS other than being copied into the minutes of the management review meeting.
The audit reveals that the new Quality Manager was given responsibility by top management to:
a) take accountability for the effectiveness of the QMS,
b) select, approve, and monitor improvement actions without involving and reporting to top management, c) promote the improvement of the QMS, and d) make efficient use of the limited financial and personnel resources allocated for the QMS by top management.
The auditor considers whether there is a nonconformity against clause 5.1.1 of ISO 9001:2015.
Select two options of the evidence required for such a nonconformity:

  • A. The Quality Manager is on target to complete only half of the improvement actions.
  • B. The Quality Manager does not have access to the resources needed for the QMS.
  • C. The Chief Executive never attends the management review meetings in person.
  • D. The Quality Manager only reports to one designated senior manager.
  • E. Top management is not accountable for the effectiveness of the QMS.
  • F. The Quality Manager avoids giving improvement actions to the Chief Executive.

正解:B、E

解説:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Clause 5.1.1 of ISO 9001:2015 - Leadership and Commitment - specifically mandates that top management must take accountability for the effectiveness of the QMS. They are also responsible for ensuring:
* Integration of the QMS into business processes (5.1.1 c)
* Promotion of customer focus and continual improvement (5.1.1 d, i)
* Availability of necessary resources (5.1.1 e)
* That the QMS achieves its intended results (5.1.1 g)
Let's analyze the selected options:
# A. Top management is not accountable for the effectiveness of the QMS.
This directly violates clause 5.1.1 a, which explicitly requires top management to take accountability for the effectiveness of the QMS. Delegating this to a middle-level Quality Manager, as described in the scenario, constitutes a nonconformity.
# F. The Quality Manager does not have access to the resources needed for the QMS.
According to clause 5.1.1 e, top management must ensure the availability of required resources for maintaining and improving the QMS. If the Quality Manager is resource-constrained, it indicates top management has failed to meet this requirement.
Now, why the other options are incorrect in terms of direct clause 5.1.1 nonconformity:
# B. Avoiding giving improvement actions to the Chief Executive - While this may reflect poor communication, it is not, by itself, a clear breach of 5.1.1 unless linked directly to top management's lack of accountability or commitment.
# C. Chief Executive never attending meetings - ISO 9001 does not require physical attendance of the Chief Executive at management reviews. What matters is whether top management is fulfilling their roles, not how.
# D. Completing only half of improvement actions - This indicates performance issues but does not necessarily indicate top management's lack of accountability, unless they failed to monitor progress entirely.
# E. Reporting to one designated senior manager - This is not inherently nonconforming unless that senior manager does not fulfill top management's responsibilities under 5.1.1.
Relevant ISO 9001:2015 Reference:
* Clause 5.1.1 a, e, g, h:
"Top management shall demonstrate leadership and commitment with respect to the quality management system by:
a) taking accountability for the effectiveness of the quality management system; e) ensuring that the resources needed for the quality management system are available..."


質問 # 80
Which two of the following are the key expected results of a quality management system that conforms to the requirements of ISO 9001:2015?

  • A. Consistently provide products that meet customers' requirements
  • B. Increased profits
  • C. Decreased number of management system nonconformities
  • D. Enhanced customer satisfaction
  • E. Decreased number of nonconforming products in all stages of the manufacturing cycle
  • F. Decreased number of warranty claims

正解:A、D

解説:
The key expected results of a quality management system that conforms to the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 are stated in clause 0.1 of the standard, which says: "The adoption of a quality management system is a strategic decision for an organization that can help to improve its overall performance and provide a sound basis for sustainable development initiatives. The potential benefits to an organization of implementing a quality management system based on this International Standard are: a) the ability to consistently provide products and services that meet customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements; b) facilitating opportunities to enhance customer satisfaction; c) addressing risks and opportunities associated with its context and objectives; d) the ability to demonstrate conformity to specified quality management system requirements." Therefore, the two options that best match these benefits are A and E, as they directly relate to providing products and services that meet customer requirements and enhancing customer satisfaction. The other options are not explicitly mentioned as key expected results, although they may be possible outcomes of implementing a quality management system. References: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality management systems - Requirements, Key Elements of an ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System, What is ISO 9001 2015 as a Quality Management Systems?


質問 # 81
You are conducting an ISO 9001 audit of a Materials Recycling Facility (MRF). The company processes waste plastics into raw material for plastic bottle manufacturers. You reach the manual picking line where operators are removing contaminant materials from incoming products, such as plastic bags, plastic film and badly contaminated items that would compromise the recycling process.
You interview the line supervisor.
You: "Why are these plastic items being rejected at this stage?"
Auditee: "They do not meet our processing standards."
You: "What is the reason for that?"
Auditee: "These items are likely to damage the machinery down the line. They can also compromise our quality standards. We need to protect our reputation for good quality output materials." You: "What happens to the rejected items?" Auditee: "Some get melted down in another process later on and some are disposed of as waste products that cannot be recycled." You: "What happens to the waste products?" Auditee: "I'm not sure. I suppose they go to landfill." After further auditing, you have gathered additional evidence.

正解:

解説:

Explanation:
A # 8.4.3.a
B # 7.2.b
C # 10.2.2
D # 10.2.1
E # 6.2
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
# A. There is no specification for incoming materials # 8.4.3.a
Clause 8.4.3(a) relates to the control of externally provided processes, products, and services, specifically the requirement to communicate appropriate specifications and requirements to suppliers:
"The organization shall ensure the adequacy of requirements prior to their communication to the external provider." Failure to specify requirements for incoming materials (e.g., what is acceptable waste plastic) risks compromising product quality.
# B. The picking operators have been trained # 7.2.b
Clause 7.2(b) relates to Competence and mandates:
"Ensure that these persons are competent on the basis of appropriate education, training, or experience." Training is a critical part of establishing and maintaining operator competence in quality-affecting tasks.
# C. The picked reject materials are not documented # 10.2.2
This clause focuses on the retention of documented information regarding nonconformities and actions taken:
"The organization shall retain documented information as evidence of: the nature of the nonconformities and any subsequent actions taken..." If rejects are not recorded, traceability and root cause analysis for quality failures are weakened.
# D. The rejected materials are segregated # 10.2.1
Clause 10.2.1 relates to nonconformity and corrective action, including containment activities such as:
"Deal with nonconforming outputs in one or more of the following ways: correction; segregation, containment..." Segregation ensures nonconforming material doesn't contaminate acceptable output.
# E. Management has set an objective for the level of rejects # 6.2
Clause 6.2 is about quality objectives. It requires organizations to:
"Establish quality objectives at relevant functions... The quality objectives shall be measurable..." Setting a measurable reject-level target aligns with improving process control and reducing waste.
References:
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.4.3.a - Information for External Providers
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 7.2.b - Competence
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 10.2.2 - Documentation of Nonconformity
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 10.2.1 - Control of Nonconforming Outputs
ISO 9001:2015 Clause 6.2 - Quality Objectives


質問 # 82
During a third-party audit of a pharmaceutical organisation (CD9000) site of seven COVID-19 testing laboratories in various terminals at a major international airport, you interview the CD 9000's General Manager (GM), who was accompanied by Jack, the legal compliance expert. Jack is acting as the guide in the absence of the Technical Manager due to him contracting COVID-19.
You: "What external and internal issues have been identified that could affect CD9000 and its quality management system?" GM: "Jack guided us on this. We identified issues like probable competition of another laboratory organisation in the airport, legal requirements on COVID-19 continuously changing, the shortage of competent laboratory analysists, the epidemic declining soon, shortage of chemicals for the analysis. It was quite a good experience." You: "Did you document these issues?" GM: "No. Jack said that ISO 9001 does not require us to document these issues." You: "How did you determine the risks associated with the issues and did you plan actions to address them?" GM: "I am not sure. The Technical Manager is responsible for this process. Jack may be able to answer this question in his absence." Select two options for how you would respond to the General Manager's suggestion:

  • A. I would ask the consultant to leave the meeting since he is not an employee of the organisation.
  • B. I would look for evidence that the actions resulting from the risk assessment had been taken.
  • C. I would not accept the legal compliance expert answering the question.
  • D. I would delay the audit until the return of the technical manager
  • E. I would ask for a different guide instead of the legal compliance expert.
  • F. I would ask to audit the Technical Manager by phone.

正解:B、F

解説:
* D. I would look for evidence that the actions resulting from the risk assessment had been taken.
* According to ISO 9001:2015, Clause 6.1.2 requires the organization to plan actions to address risks and opportunities. The organization must integrate and implement these actions into its quality management system and evaluate their effectiveness. The auditor should seek evidence that the organization has assessed the risks and taken appropriate actions.
* B. I would ask to audit the Technical Manager by phone.
* As the Technical Manager is responsible for this process and is absent due to illness, it is reasonable to attempt to contact him to obtain accurate information. This ensures that the audit process is not unduly delayed and that the information is obtained from the appropriate person.
* A. I would not accept the legal compliance expert answering the question.
* While the legal compliance expert might not be the best source for technical details, outright rejecting their input is not appropriate. It is better to first verify if the expert can provide relevant information.
* C. I would delay the audit until the return of the Technical Manager.
* This would be an inefficient approach. Contacting the Technical Manager by phone is a more practical and reasonable option.
* E. I would ask for a different guide instead of the legal compliance expert.
* The guide's role is not necessarily to answer technical questions but to facilitate the audit. Since Jack is already familiar with the situation, replacing him may not add value.
* F. I would ask the consultant to leave the meeting since he is not an employee of the organization.
* This is inappropriate and could disrupt the audit process. There is no rule in ISO 9001 preventing a consultant from assisting in the audit if authorized by the organization.
Why Not the Other Options:


質問 # 83
Scenario 3:
Fin-Pro is a financial institution in Austria offering commercial banking, wealth management, and investment services. The company faced a significant loss of customers due to failing to improve service quality as they expanded.
To regain customer confidence, top management implemented a QMS based on ISO 9001. After a year, they contacted ACB, a local certification body, to pursue ISO 9001 certification.
The audit team was led by Emilia, an experienced lead auditor, and included three auditors. After an agreement was reached, ACB sent the audit objectives to the audit team.
The audit team began by gathering information about Fin-Pro's understanding of ISO 9001 requirements.
While reviewing documented information, they noticed missing records of training and awareness sessions.
They conducted employee interviews to verify attendance.
The team also reviewed the organizational chart and job descriptions to confirm employee competence. They observed the company's working environment (social, psychological, and physical conditions).
The audit team analyzed the evidence and prepared an audit report with findings and conclusions.
ACB sent the audit objectives to the audit team after an agreement was reached. Is this acceptable?

  • A. Yes, as long as the audit team leader approves.
  • B. Yes, the audit objectives should be known only after an agreement is reached.
  • C. No, only the auditee should know the audit objectives.
  • D. No, the audit objectives should be part of the audit offer.

正解:D

解説:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Clause References:
ISO 19011:2018 (Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems), Clause 5.3 - Establishing the Audit Objectives ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.2 - Audit Planning Why is the Correct Answer C?
Audit objectives must be clearly defined in the audit offer to ensure that the scope, criteria, and purpose are agreed upon in advance.
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 (which governs certification bodies) requires that audit objectives be established before the audit begins to ensure transparency and effectiveness.
Sending audit objectives after an agreement has been reached could lead to misalignment between the auditee' s expectations and the audit's purpose.
Why are the Other Options Incorrect?
A (Audit objectives should be known only after agreement) # Incorrect because objectives must be pre- defined in the audit offer.
B (Only the auditee should know the objectives) # Incorrect because both the auditor and auditee must align on objectives.
D (Approval from the lead auditor is sufficient) # Incorrect because audit planning follows formal procedures defined by ISO/IEC 17021-1.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.2 - Audit Planning
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.3 - Establishing the Audit Objectives


質問 # 84
Which of the following is a principle of maintaining audit work documents?

  • A. Completeness
  • B. Transparency
  • C. Fair presentation

正解:A

解説:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Completeness ensures that all necessary audit evidence, observations, and findings are properly documented, which is critical for traceability and accountability in an audit.
While transparency and fair presentation are principles of auditing, completeness is specifically related to maintaining audit work documents, as required in ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.5.4 (Preparing Audit Work Documents).
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.5.4 (Preparing Audit Work Documents)


質問 # 85
Which of the following three options could be considered potential threats to impartiality in an audit context?

  • A. Self-audit
  • B. Familiarity
  • C. Intimidation
  • D. Competence
  • E. Experience

正解:A、B、C

解説:
Questions no: 1 Verified answer: = C, D, E Comprehensive But Short Explanation: = Potential threats to impartiality in an audit context include familiarity (having a close relationship with the auditee), intimidation (being coerced or feeling pressured), and self-audit (auditing one's own work). These factors can compromise the auditor's objectivity and the audit's integrity. References: = The information is based on the ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group documents which discuss threats to auditor impartiality and how they may compromise an auditor's objectivity123.


質問 # 86
Scenario 4:
TD Advertising is a print management company based in Chicago. The company offers design services, digital printing, storage, and distribution. As TD expanded, its management recognized that success depended on adopting new technologies and improving quality.
To ensure customer satisfaction and quality improvement, the company decided to pursue ISO 9001 certification.
After implementing the QMS, TD hired a well-known certification body for an audit. Anne Key was appointed as the audit team leader. She received a document listing the audit team members, audit scope, criteria, duration, and audit engagement limits.
Anne reviewed the document and approved the audit mandate. The certification body and TD's top management signed the certification agreement.
Before contacting TD, Anne reviewed the audit scope and noticed that TD made changes to it due to the adoption of new printing equipment. However, Anne disagreed with the changes, stating they would affect the audit timeline. She considered withdrawing from the audit.
How do you assess the situation presented in the last paragraph of scenario 4?

  • A. TD cannot make any change to the audit scope once it has been defined.
  • B. TD should have agreed with the certification body and Anne about any change in the audit scope.
  • C. Anne has full authority to reject any scope changes, even if TD and the certification body agree.
  • D. Anne cannot withdraw from the audit once the audit mandate is accepted.

正解:B

解説:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
ISO 9001:2015 requires collaboration between the auditee (TD Advertising), the certification body, and the audit leader when making changes to audit scope.
Clause References:
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.2.3 - Conducting the Audit: Any change in audit scope must be agreed upon by all parties before proceeding.
Why is the Correct Answer C?
* TD cannot unilaterally change the scope without agreement from the certification body and audit leader.
* The certification body must ensure the scope remains relevant and that resources are allocated properly.
Why are the Other Options Incorrect?
* A (Anne cannot withdraw) # Incorrect, Anne CAN withdraw if the changes make the audit unfeasible, but she must consult with the certification body first.
* B (TD cannot change the scope) # Incorrect, scope changes are allowed but must be formally approved.
* D (Anne has full authority to reject scope changes) # Incorrect, scope changes require mutual agreement among all parties.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.2.3 - Conducting the Audit


質問 # 87
Scenario 1: AL-TAX is a company located in California which provides financial and accounting services. The company manages the finances of 17 companies and now is seeking to expand their business even more The CEO of AL-TAX, Liam Durham, claims that the company seeks to provide top- notch services to their clients Recently, there were a number of new companies interested in the services provided by AL-TAX.
In order to fulfill the requirements of new clients and further improve quality, Liam discussed with other top management members the idea of implementing a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001. During the discussion, one of the members of the top management claimed that the size of the company was not large enough to implement a QMS. In addition, another member claimed that a QMS is not applicable for the industry in which AL TAX operates. However, as the majority of the members voted for implementing the QMS. Liam initiated the project.
Initially, Liam hired an experienced consultant to help AL-TAX with the implementation of the QMS.
They started by planning and developing processes and methods for the establishment of a QMS based on ISO 9001. Furthermore, they ensured that the quality policy is appropriate to the purpose and context of AL TAX and communicated to all employees. In addition, they also tried to follow a process that enables the company to ensure that its processes are adequately resourced and managed, and that improvement opportunities are determined.
During the implementation process, Liam and the consultant focused on determining the factors that could hinder their processes from achieving the planned results and implemented some preventive actions in order to avoid potential nonconformities Six months after the implementation of the QMS.
AL-TAX conducted an internal audit. The results of the internal audit revealed that the QMS was not fulfilling all requirements of ISO 9001. A serious issue was that the QMS was not fulfilling the requirements of clause 5.1.2 Customer focus and had also not ensured clear and open communication channels with suppliers.
Throughout the next three years, the company worked on improving its QMS through the PDCA cycle in the respective areas. To assess the effectiveness of the intended actions while causing minimal disruptions, they tested changes that need to be made on a smaller scale. After taking necessary actions, AL-TAX decided to apply for certification against ISO 9001.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
The CEO of AL-TAX hired an experienced consultant to help with the implementation of the QMS. Is this required from ISO 9001?

  • A. Yes, especially for companies that do not have competent personnel.
  • B. No, contracting external consultants is not required.
  • C. Yes, external advice is necessary for an effective implementation.

正解:B

解説:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:ISO 9001:2015 does not require an organization to hire external consultants for the implementation of a Quality Management System (QMS). Clause 7.2 (Competence) states that an organization must ensure that personnel are competent based on education, training, or experience. However, it does not mandate hiring an external consultant. The organization can choose to develop internal competency or seek external assistance at its discretion.
Additionally, Clause 5.1.1 (Leadership and Commitment) specifies that top management is accountable for the effectiveness of the QMS, including ensuring sufficient resources and competent personnel. Hiring an external consultant is an option, not a requirement.


質問 # 88
For a third-party, match the Activity with the Responsibility for conducting it.

正解:

解説:

Explanation:

Approve Certification Body: Accreditation Body
Award certification: Certification Body
Recommend certification: Audit Team Leader
Maintain certification:
Comprehensive Detailed Explanation
In the context of a third-party ISO 9001 audit, different entities play specific roles in the certification process.
Here's a detailed explanation of the responsibilities:
Approve Certification Body: Accreditation BodyThe Accreditation Body is responsible for approving Certification Bodies. Accreditation Bodies are independent entities that evaluate the competence of Certification Bodies, ensuring they meet international standards like ISO/IEC 17021, which sets out the criteria for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems. In this role, they confirm that the Certification Body is capable of conducting ISO 9001 audits and granting certifications in accordance with international guidelines.
Award Certification: Certification BodyThe Certification Body is the entity that ultimately awards the certification to an organization after verifying that it meets the ISO 9001 standards. Certification Bodies conduct audits, either directly or through a team of auditors, and based on the audit outcomes, they issue the certification, indicating that the organization complies with ISO 9001.
Recommend Certification: Audit Team LeaderThe Audit Team Leader is responsible for leading the audit and making a recommendation to the Certification Body. This recommendation is based on the audit findings- whether the organization meets the ISO 9001 requirements or if there are areas of non-compliance that need corrective action. The final decision on certification is not made by the Audit Team Leader but by the Certification Body.
Maintain Certification: Certification BodyMaintaining certification refers to the ongoing process of ensuring that an organization continues to comply with ISO 9001 requirements. The Certification Body conducts regular surveillance audits (e.g., annually) and may also perform recertification audits (typically every three years). This ongoing monitoring ensures that the certified organization continues to adhere to the quality management standards over time.
This breakdown clearly assigns responsibility based on the defined roles of Accreditation Bodies, Certification Bodies, and Audit Teams in the ISO 9001 certification process.


質問 # 89
You are carrying out an audit at a single-site organisation seeking certification to ISO 9001 for the first time.
The organisation offers warehousing and export services to customers. Customers are invoiced for the time stock items are stored in the warehouse. Transport to and from the warehouse is controlled by the organisation and approved subcontract transport services are used. The organization does not have its own transport vehicles. Stock items are not purchased by the organisation.
You have gathered audit evidence as outlined in the table. Match the ISO 9001 Clause 8 extract to the audit evidence.

正解:

解説:

Explanation:
The table below shows the possible matching of the ISO 9001 Clause 8 extract to the audit evidence.
Table
Audit evidence
ISO 9001 Clause 8 extract
Four of the 10 pallets of stock sampled in the warehouse were not labelled.
"8.5.2 ... shall use suitable means to identify outputs ..."
A damaged pallet of stock seen in the quarantine area was leaking liquid onto the floor.
"8.7.1 ... shall ensure that outputs that do not conform to their requirements are identified and controlled ..." One of the fork-lift truck drivers had no fork-lift truck driving licence.
"8.5.1 e ... shall include, as applicable ... the appointment of competent persons ..." There was no pest control provision in the warehouse.
"8.5.4 ... shall preserve the outputs during production and service provision ..." Two pallets of temperature-sensitive stock items were being stored at ambient as the chilled storage facility was full.
"8.1 ... shall plan, implement and control the processes ..."


質問 # 90
You are conducting a third-party Stage 1 audit at ABC Ltd, a single-site organisation that manufactures wooden furniture. You interview the Technical Director to learn more about the organisation. The Technical Director explains that they have had a successful year and that obtaining ISO 9001 certification will support the further growth of the business. You ask for an overview of the organisation's structure and its interrelationships with external interested parties.
The Technical Director shows you a document detailing all business processes and interrelationships. You notice in this document that another organisation called Teak Ltd manufactures wooden furniture on behalf of ABC Ltd. The Technical Director confirms this capability has been accounted for in the scope of the quality management system. You learn that the furniture manufactured by Teak Ltd has accounted for 40% of the sales revenue over the previous 12 months.
Which two of the following options best describe how you would plan the audit of the interrelationship with Teak Ltd during the Stage 2 audit at ABC Ltd?

  • A. Verify Teak Ltd supply arrangements as described in the ABC Ltd quality management system
  • B. Verify how ABC Ltd evaluates the performance of Teak Ltd
  • C. Verify the quality management system at Teak Ltd by conducting an audit at their site
  • D. Verify if Teak Ltd are certified to ISO 9001
  • E. Verify the controls concerning customer property implemented by Teak Ltd
  • F. Verify whether the design processes of Teak Ltd comply with ISO 9001

正解:A、B

解説:
According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.4, an organization is required to control the processes, products and services provided by external providers, including those that affect the quality of the organization's own products and services. This includes determining the controls to be applied to the external provision of processes, products and services, as well as the information to be communicated to the external providers. The organization is also required to monitor, measure, and evaluate the performance of the external providers and retain documented information of these activities.
Therefore, in the scenario given, ABC Ltd is responsible for controlling the processes, products and services provided by Teak Ltd, as they affect the quality of ABC Ltd's own products and services. This means that ABC Ltd should have established criteria and methods for evaluating the performance of Teak Ltd, as well as documented information of the results of such evaluation. ABC Ltd should also have defined the supply arrangements with Teak Ltd, including the specifications, requirements, and verification activities related to the products and services provided by Teak Ltd.
Hence, the best options to describe how to plan the audit of the interrelationship with Teak Ltd during the Stage 2 audit at ABC Ltd are A and D, as they are aligned with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.4.
The other options are either irrelevant or beyond the scope of the audit, as they do not pertain to the control of external provision by ABC Ltd.
References:
ISO 9001:2015(en), Quality management systems - Requirements, clause 8.4 ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.3.1 and 6.4.2 ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course | IRCA Certified | BSI, section "Learning objectives" ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material | 3FOLD Education Centre, module 5 and 6


質問 # 91
......

最新ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor試験問題にはリアルなISO-9001-Lead-Auditor問題集があります:https://jp.fast2test.com/ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor-premium-file.html

最新ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor認証有効な試験問題集解答を試そう!:https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ros5EIfy6eakje5t3yR997hf_YiBBKPp


弊社を連絡する

我々は12時間以内ですべてのお問い合わせを答えます。

我々の働いている時間: ( GMT 0:00-15:00 )
月曜日から土曜日まで

サポート: 現在連絡 

English Deutsch 繁体中文 한국어