IAPP AIGPリアル試験問題解答は無料
試験問題集でAIGP練習無料最新のIAPP練習テスト
IAPP AIGP 認定試験の出題範囲：
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
質問 # 54
A U.S. mortgage company developed an Al platform that was trained using anonymized details from mortgage applications, including the applicant's education, employment and demographic information, as well as from subsequent payment or default information. The Al platform will be used automatically grant or deny new mortgage applications, depending on whether the platform views an applicant as presenting a likely risk of default.
Which of the following laws is NOT relevant to this use case?
- A. Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
- B. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
- C. Fair Housing Act.
- D. Fair Credit Reporting Act.
正解：B
解説：
The U.S. mortgage company's AI platform relates to housing and credit, making the Fair Housing Act (A), Fair Credit Reporting Act (B), and Equal Credit Opportunity Act (C) relevant. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 deals with employment discrimination and is not directly relevant to the mortgage application context (D).
質問 # 55
What is the main purpose of accountability structures under the Govern function of the NIST Al Risk Management Framework?
- A. To establish diverse, equitable and inclusive processes.
- B. To enable and encourage participation by external stakeholders.
- C. To empower and train appropriate cross-functional teams.
- D. To determine responsibility for allocating budgetary resources.
正解：C
解説：
The NIST AI Risk Management Framework's Govern function emphasizes the importance of establishing accountability structures that empower and train cross-functional teams. This is crucial because cross- functional teams bring diverse perspectives and expertise, which are essential for effective AI governance and risk management. Training these teams ensures that they are well-equipped to handle their responsibilities and can make informed decisions that align with the organization's AI principles and ethical standards. Reference:
NIST AI Risk Management Framework documentation, Govern function section.
質問 # 56
CASE STUDY
Please use the following answer the next question:
A mid-size US healthcare network has decided to develop an Al solution to detect a type of cancer that is most likely arise in adults. Specifically, the healthcare network intends to create a recognition algorithm that will perform an initial review of all imaging and then route records a radiologist for secondary review pursuant Agreed-upon criteria (e.g., a confidence score below a threshold).
To date, the healthcare network has taken the following steps: defined its Al ethical principles: conducted discovery to identify the intended uses and success criteria for the system: established an Al governance committee; assembled a broad, crossfunctional team with clear roles and responsibilities; and created policies and procedures to document standards, workflows, timelines and risk thresholds during the project.
The healthcare network intends to retain a cloud provider to host the solution and a consulting firm to help develop the algorithm using the healthcare network's existing data and de-identified data that is licensed from a large US clinical research partner.
Which of the following steps can best mitigate the possibility of discrimination prior to training and testing the Al solution?
- A. Create a bias bounty program.
- B. Engage a third party to perform an audit.
- C. Procure more data from clinical research partners.
- D. Perform an impact assessment.
正解：D
解説：
Performing an impact assessment is the best step to mitigate the possibility of discrimination before training and testing the AI solution. An impact assessment, such as a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) or Algorithmic Impact Assessment (AIA), helps identify potential biases and discriminatory outcomes that could arise from the AI system. This process involves evaluating the data and the algorithm for fairness, accountability, and transparency. It ensures that any biases in the data are detected and addressed, thus preventing discriminatory practices and promoting ethical AI deployment. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge on Ethical AI and Impact Assessments.
質問 # 57
Which of the following is the least relevant consideration in assessing whether users should be given the right to opt out from an Al system?
- A. Feasibility.
- B. Cost of alternative mechanisms.
- C. Industry practice.
- D. Risk to users.
正解：B
解説：
When assessing whether users should be given the right to opt out from an AI system, the primary considerations are feasibility, risk to users, and industry practice. Feasibility addresses whether the opt-out mechanism can be practically implemented. Risk to users assesses the potential harm or benefits users might face if they cannot opt out. Industry practice considers the norms and standards within the industry. However, the cost of alternative mechanisms, while important in the broader context of implementation, is not directly relevant to the ethical consideration of whether users should have the right to opt out. The focus should be on protecting user rights and ensuring ethical AI practices.
Reference: AIGP BODY OF KNOWLEDGE, sections discussing user rights and ethical considerations in AI.
質問 # 58
What is the best reason for a company adopt a policy that prohibits the use of generative Al?
- A. Avoid needing to identify and hire qualified resources.
- B. Avoid the time necessary to train employees on acceptable use.
- C. Avoid accidental disclosure to its confidential and proprietary information.
- D. Avoid using technology that cannot be monetized.
正解：C
解説：
The primary concern for a company adopting a policy prohibiting the use of generative AI is the risk of accidental disclosure of confidential and proprietary information. Generative AI tools can inadvertently leak sensitive data during the creation process or through data sharing. This risk outweighs the other reasons listed, as protecting sensitive information is critical to maintaining the company's competitive edge and legal compliance. This rationale is discussed in the sections on risk management and data privacy in the IAPP AIGP Body of Knowledge.
質問 # 59
An artist has been using an Al tool to create digital art and would like to ensure that it has copyright protection in the United States.
Which of the following is most likely to enable the artist to receive copyright protection?
- A. Provide a log of the prompts the artist used to generate the images.
- B. Ensure the tool was trained using publicly available content.
- C. Obtain a representation from the Al provider on how the tool works.
- D. Update the images in a creative way to demonstrate that it is the artist's.
正解：D
解説：
For the artist to receive copyright protection, the most effective approach is to demonstrate that the final artwork includes sufficient creative input by the artist. By updating or altering the images in a way that reflects the artist's personal creativity, the artist can claim originality, which is a core requirement for copyright protection under U.S. law. The other options do not directly address the originality and creative input required for copyright. This is highlighted in the sections on copyright protection in the IAPP AIGP Body of Knowledge.
質問 # 60
What is the primary purpose of an Al impact assessment?
- A. Anticipate and manage the potential risks and harms of an Al system.
- B. To define and evaluate the legal risks associated with developing an Al system.
- C. To define and document the roles and responsibilities of Al stakeholders.
- D. To identify and measure the benefits of an Al system.
正解：A
解説：
The primary purpose of an AI impact assessment is to anticipate and manage the potential risks and harms of an AI system. This includes identifying the possible negative outcomes and implementing measures to mitigate these risks. This process helps ensure that AI systems are developed and deployed in a manner that is ethically and socially responsible, addressing concerns such as bias, fairness, transparency, and accountability. The assessment often involves a thorough evaluation of the AI system's design, data inputs, outputs, and the potential impact on various stakeholders. This approach is crucial for maintaining public trust and adherence to regulatory requirements.
質問 # 61
Scenario:
An organization is developing a powerful general-purpose AI (GPAI) model that has systemic impact. The compliance team is assessing what legal obligations apply under the EU AI Act.
Under the EU AI Act, which of the following compliance actions applies only to General Purpose AI models with systemic risk?
- A. Implementing an intellectual property policy to comply with EU copyright laws
- B. Publishing a detailed summary of the data used to train the model
- C. Maintaining up-to-date technical documentation, including testing details
- D. Making information available to downstream providers who integrate the model into their AI systems
正解：B
解説：
The correct answer is A. Only GPAI models with systemic risk must publish a detailed summary of training data to meet transparency and accountability standards under the EU AI Act.
From the AI Governance in Practice Report 2024 (EU AI Act Section):
"For GPAI systems with systemic risk, providers must publish sufficiently detailed summaries of the content used to train the model." Also, the AIGP ILT Guide confirms:
"The obligation to disclose summaries of training data applies only to systemic-risk GPAI models, not all general-purpose models or high-risk systems." This unique requirement is part of the Act's effort to increase transparency and auditability for powerful foundational models.
質問 # 62
CASE STUDY
Please use the following answer the next question:
ABC Corp, is a leading insurance provider offering a range of coverage options to individuals. ABC has decided to utilize artificial intelligence to streamline and improve its customer acquisition and underwriting process, including the accuracy and efficiency of pricing policies.
ABC has engaged a cloud provider to utilize and fine-tune its pre-trained, general purpose large language model ("LLM"). In particular, ABC intends to use its historical customer data-including applications, policies, and claims-and proprietary pricing and risk strategies to provide an initial qualification assessment of potential customers, which would then be routed tA. human underwriter for final review.
ABC and the cloud provider have completed training and testing the LLM, performed a readiness assessment, and made the decision to deploy the LLM into production. ABC has designated an internal compliance team to monitor the model during the first month, specifically to evaluate the accuracy, fairness, and reliability of its output. After the first month in production, ABC realizes that the LLM declines a higher percentage of women's loan applications due primarily to women historically receiving lower salaries than men.
Each of the following steps would support fairness testing by the compliance team during the first month in production EXCEPT?
- A. Identifying if additional training data should be collected for specific demographic groups.
- B. Using tools to help understand factors that may account for differences in decision-making.
- C. Providing the loan applicants with information about the model capabilities and limitations.
- D. Validating a similar level of decision-making across different demographic groups.
正解：C
解説：
Providing the loan applicants with information about the model capabilities and limitations would not directly support fairness testing by the compliance team. Fairness testing focuses on evaluating the model's decisions for biases and ensuring equitable treatment across different demographic groups, rather than informing applicants about the model.
Reference: The AIGP Body of Knowledge outlines that fairness testing involves technical assessments such as validating decision-making consistency across demographics and using tools to understand decision factors. While transparency to applicants is important for ethical AI use, it does not contribute directly to the technical process of fairness testing.
質問 # 63
A company initially intended to use a large data set containing personal information to train an Al model.
After consideration, the company determined that it can derive enough value from the data set without any personal information and permanently obfuscated all personal data elements before training the model.
This is an example of applying which privacy-enhancing technique (PET)?
- A. Differential privacy.
- B. Pseudonymization.
- C. Anonymization.
- D. Federated learning.
正解：C
解説：
Anonymization is a privacy-enhancing technique that involves removing or permanently altering personal data elements to prevent the identification of individuals. In this case, the company obfuscated all personal data elements before training the model, which aligns with the definition of anonymization. This ensures that the data cannot be traced back to individuals, thereby protecting their privacy while still allowing the company to derive value from the dataset. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge, privacy-enhancing techniques section.
質問 # 64
CASE STUDY
A company is considering the procurement of an AI system designed to enhance the security of IT infrastructure. The AI system analyzes how users type on their laptops, including typing speed, rhythm and pressure, to create a unique user profile. This data is then used to authenticate users and ensure that only authorized personnel can access sensitive resources.
All of the following are obligations of the company as a data controller when implementing its AI system EXCEPT?
- A. Allowing data subject access requests (DSARs)
- B. Implementing technical and organizational measures
- C. Conducting a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) / Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)
- D. Ensuring that third-party processors are based in the same country as the company
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is A. While location of processors may have implications (such as for data transfers under GDPR), there is no absolute requirement that third-party processors be based in the same country.
From the AI Governance in Practice Report 2024 and ILT Guide:
"Data controllers are responsible for ensuring that third-party processors have adequate protections, but not necessarily that they reside in the same jurisdiction. What is required is legal safeguards (e.g., SCCs) for international transfers, not same-country location." In contrast, DPIAs, DSARs, and implementation of technical/organizational safeguards are explicitly required under GDPR and responsible AI frameworks.
質問 # 65
All of the following are elements of establishing a global Al governance infrastructure EXCEPT?
- A. Understanding differences in norms across countries.
- B. Providing training to foster a culture that promotes ethical behavior.
- C. Publicly disclosing ethical principles.
- D. Creating policies and procedures to manage third-partyrisk.
正解：C
解説：
Establishing a global AI governance infrastructure involves several key elements, including providing training to foster a culture that promotes ethical behavior, creating policies and procedures to manage third-party risk, and understanding differences in norms across countries. While publicly disclosing ethical principles can enhance transparency and trust, it is not a core element necessary for the establishment of a governance infrastructure. The focus is more on internal processes and structures rather than public disclosure. Reference:
AIGP Body of Knowledge on AI Governance and Infrastructure.
質問 # 66
Pursuant to the White House Executive Order of November 2023, who is responsible for creating guidelines to conduct red-teaming tests of Al systems?
- A. Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
- B. Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP).
- C. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
- D. National Science and Technology Council (NSTC).
正解：C
解説：
The White House Executive Order of November 2023 designates the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as the responsible body for creating guidelines to conduct red-teaming tests of AI systems. NIST is tasked with developing and providing standards and frameworks to ensure the security, reliability, and ethical deployment of AI systems, including conducting rigorous red-teaming exercises to identify vulnerabilities and assess risks in AI systems.
Reference: AIGP BODY OF KNOWLEDGE, sections on AI governance and regulatory frameworks, and the White House Executive Order of November 2023.
質問 # 67
What is the main purpose of accountability structures under the Govern function of the NIST Al Risk Management Framework?
- A. To establish diverse, equitable and inclusive processes.
- B. To enable and encourage participation by external stakeholders.
- C. To empower and train appropriate cross-functional teams.
- D. To determine responsibility for allocating budgetary resources.
正解：C
解説：
The NIST AI Risk Management Framework's Govern function emphasizes the importance of establishing accountability structures that empower and train cross-functional teams. This is crucial because cross-functional teams bring diverse perspectives and expertise, which are essential for effective AI governance and risk management. Training these teams ensures that they are well-equipped to handle their responsibilities and can make informed decisions that align with the organization's AI principles and ethical standards. Reference: NIST AI Risk Management Framework documentation, Govern function section.
質問 # 68
The framework set forth in the White House Blueprint for an Al Bill of Rights addresses all of the following EXCEPT?
- A. High-risk mitigation standards.
- B. Data privacy.
- C. Human alternatives, consideration and fallback.
- D. Safe and effective systems.
正解：A
解説：
The White House Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights focuses on protecting civil rights, privacy, and ensuring AI systems are safe and effective. It includes principles like data privacy (D), human alternatives (A), and safe and effective systems (C). However, it does not specifically address high-risk mitigation standards as a distinct category (B).
質問 # 69
What is the primary reason the EU is considering updates to its Product Liability Directive?
- A. Address digital services and connected products.
- B. To define new liability exemptions for defective products.
- C. To increase the minimum warranty level for defective goods.
- D. Address free and open-source software.
正解：A
解説：
The primary reason the EU is considering updates to its Product Liability Directive is to address digital services and connected products. The current directive does not adequately cover the complexities and challenges posed by modern digital and connected technologies. By updating the directive, the EU aims to ensure that it remains relevant and effective in addressing the liabilities associated with these advanced products, ensuring consumer protection and fair market practices in the digital age.
質問 # 70
When monitoring the functional performance of a model that has been deployed into production, all of the following are concerns EXCEPT?
- A. System cost.
- B. Model drift.
- C. Data loss.
- D. Feature drift.
正解：A
解説：
When monitoring the functional performance of a model deployed into production, concerns typically include feature drift, model drift, and data loss. Feature drift refers to changes in the input features that can affect the model's predictions. Model drift is when the model's performance degrades over time due to changes in the data or environment. Data loss can impact the accuracy and reliability of the model. However, system cost, while important for budgeting and financial planning, is not a direct concern when monitoring the functional performance of a deployed model. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge on Model Monitoring and Maintenance.
質問 # 71
A company developed Al technology that can analyze text, video, images and sound to tag content, including the names of animals, humans and objects.
What type of Al is this technology classified as?
- A. Transformative Al.
- B. Expert system.
- C. Deductive inference.
- D. Multi-modal model.
正解：D
解説：
A multi-modal model is an AI system that can process and analyze multiple types of data, such as text, video, images, and sound. This type of AI integrates different data sources to enhance its understanding and decision-making capabilities. In the given scenario, the AI technology that tags content including names of animals, humans, and objects falls under this category. Reference: AIGP BODY OF KNOWLEDGE, which outlines the capabilities and use cases of multi-modal models.
質問 # 72
CASE STUDY
Please use the following answer the next question:
A local police department in the United States procured an Al system to monitor and analyze social media feeds, online marketplaces and other sources of public information to detect evidence of illegal activities (e.g., sale of drugs or stolen goods). The Al system works by surveilling the public sites in order to identify individuals that are likely to have committed a crime. It cross-references the individuals against data maintained by law enforcement and then assigns a percentage score of the likelihood of criminal activity based on certain factors like previous criminal history, location, time, race and gender.
The police department retained a third-party consultant assist in the procurement process, specifically to evaluate two finalists. Each of the vendors provided information about their system's accuracy rates, the diversity of their training data and how their system works. The consultant determined that the first vendor's system has a higher accuracy rate and based on this information, recommended this vendor to the police department.
The police department chose the first vendor and implemented its Al system. As part of the implementation, the department and consultant created a usage policy for the system, which includes training police officers on how the system works and how to incorporate it into their investigation process.
The police department has now been using the Al system for a year. An internal review has found that every time the system scored a likelihood of criminal activity at or above 90%, the police investigation subsequently confirmed that the individual had, in fact, committed a crime. Based on these results, the police department wants to forego investigations for cases where the Al system gives a score of at least 90% and proceed directly with an arrest.
The best human oversight mechanism for the police department to implement is that a police officer should?
- A. Explain to the accused how the Al system works.
- B. Confirm the Al recommendation prior to sentencing.
- C. Consider the Al recommendation as part of the criminal investigation.
- D. Ensure an accused is given notice that the Al system was used.
正解：C
解説：
The best human oversight mechanism for the police department to implement is for a police officer to consider the AI recommendation as part of the criminal investigation. This ensures that the AI system's output is used as a tool to aid human decision-making rather than replace it. The police officer should integrate the AI's insights with other evidence and contextual information to make informed decisions, maintaining a balance between technological aid and human judgment. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge on AI Integration and Human Oversight.
質問 # 73
All of the following types of testing can help evaluate the performance of a responsible Al system EXCEPT?
- A. Adversarial robustness.
- B. Risk probability/severity.
- C. Statistical sampling.
- D. Decision analysis.
正解：B
解説：
Risk probability/severity testing is not typically used to evaluate the performance of an AI system. While important for risk management, it does not directly assess an AI system's operational performance.
Adversarial robustness, statistical sampling, and decision analysis are all methods that can help evaluate the performance of a responsible AI system by testing its resilience, accuracy, and decision-making processes under various conditions. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge on AI Performance Evaluation and Testing.
質問 # 74
CASE STUDY
Please use the following answer the next question:
XYZ Corp., a premier payroll services company that employs thousands of people globally, is embarking on a new hiring campaign and wants to implement policies and procedures to identify and retain the best talent. The new talent will help the company's product team expand its payroll offerings to companies in the healthcare and transportation sectors, including in Asia.
It has become time consuming and expensive for HR to review all resumes, and they are concerned that human reviewers might be susceptible to bias.
Address these concerns, the company is considering using a third-party Al tool to screen resumes and assist with hiring. They have been talking to several vendors about possibly obtaining a third-party Al-enabled hiring solution, as long as it would achieve its goals and comply with all applicable laws.
The organization has a large procurement team that is responsible for the contracting of technology solutions.
One of the procurement team's goals is to reduce costs, and it often prefers lower-cost solutions. Others within the company are responsible for integrating and deploying technology solutions into the organization's operations in a responsible, cost-effective manner.
The organization is aware of the risks presented by Al hiring tools and wants to mitigate them. It also questions how best to organize and train its existing personnel to use the Al hiring tool responsibly. Their concerns are heightened by the fact that relevant laws vary across jurisdictions and continue to change.
Which other stakeholder groups should be involved in the selection and implementation of the Al hiring tool?
- A. Supply Chain and Marketing.
- B. Marketing and Compliance.
- C. Finance and Legal.
- D. Litigation and Product Development.
正解：C
解説：
In the selection and implementation of the AI hiring tool, involving Finance and Legal is crucial. The Finance team is essential for assessing cost implications, budget considerations, and financial risks. The Legal team is necessary to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including those related to data privacy, employment, and anti-discrimination. Involving these stakeholders ensures a comprehensive evaluation of both the financial viability and legal compliance of the AI tool, mitigating potential risks and aligning with organizational objectives and regulatory requirements.
質問 # 75
CASE STUDY
Please use the following answer the next question:
XYZ Corp., a premier payroll services company that employs thousands of people globally, is embarking on a new hiring campaign and wants to implement policies and procedures to identify and retain the best talent.
The new talent will help the company's product team expand its payroll offerings to companies in the healthcare and transportation sectors, including in Asia.
It has become time consuming and expensive for HR to review all resumes, and they are concerned that human reviewers might be susceptible to bias.
Address these concerns, the company is considering using a third-party Al tool to screen resumes and assist with hiring. They have been talking to several vendors about possibly obtaining a third-party Al-enabled hiring solution, as long as it would achieve its goals and comply with all applicable laws.
The organization has a large procurement team that is responsible for the contracting of technology solutions.
One of the procurement team's goals is to reduce costs, and it often prefers lower-cost solutions. Others within the company are responsible for integrating and deploying technology solutions into the organization's operations in a responsible, cost-effective manner.
The organization is aware of the risks presented by Al hiring tools and wants to mitigate them. It also questions how best to organize and train its existing personnel to use the Al hiring tool responsibly. Their concerns are heightened by the fact that relevant laws vary across jurisdictions and continue to change.
All of the following are potential negative consequences created by using the Al tool when making hiring decisions EXCEPT?
- A. Discriminatory treatment.
- B. Intellectual property infringement.
- C. Civil rights violations.
- D. Reputational harm.
正解：B
解説：
The potential negative consequences of using an AI tool in hiring include reputational harm (A), civil rights violations (B), and discriminatory treatment (C). These issues stem from biases in the AI system or its misuse, which can lead to unfair hiring practices and legal liabilities. Intellectual property infringement (D) is not a typical consequence of using AI in hiring, as it relates to the unauthorized use of protected intellectual property, which is not directly relevant to the hiring process or the potential biases within AI tools.
質問 # 76
Scenario:
A company using AI for resume screening understands the risks of algorithmic bias and the evolving legal requirements across jurisdictions. It wants to implement the right governance controls to prevent reputational damage from misuse of the AI hiring tool.
Which of the following measures should the company adopt to best mitigate its risk of reputational harm from using the AI tool?
- A. Require the procurement and deployment teams to agree upon the AI tool
- B. Test the AI tool pre- and post-deployment
- C. Ensure the vendor provides indemnification for the AI tool
- D. Continue to require the company's hiring personnel to manually screen all applicants
正解：B
解説：
The correct answer is A. Pre- and post-deployment testing ensures bias, accuracy, and fairness are evaluated and corrected as needed, which is essential for reputational risk mitigation.
From the AIGP Body of Knowledge:
"Testing AI systems before and after deployment is critical to ensure performance, fairness, and compliance.
Failing to do so may result in reputational damage and legal exposure." AI Governance in Practice Report 2024 (Bias/Fairness and Risk Sections):
"System impact assessments, testing, and post-deployment monitoring are necessary to identify and mitigate risks... This supports both compliance and public trust." Testing is proactive, unlike indemnification (which transfers risk after damage), or requiring manual review (which defeats automation).
質問 # 77
What is the term for an algorithm that focuses on making the best choice achieve an immediate objective at a particular step or decision point, based on the available information and without regard for the longer-term best solutions?
- A. Efficient.
- B. Single-lane.
- C. Greedy.
- D. Optimized.
正解：C
解説：
A greedy algorithm is one that makes the best choice at each step to achieve an immediate objective, without considering the longer-term consequences. It focuses on local optimization at each decision point with the hope that these local solutions will lead to an optimal global solution. However, greedy algorithms do not always produce the best overall solution for certain problems, but they are useful when an immediate, locally optimal solution is desired. Reference: AIGP Body of Knowledge, algorithm types section.
質問 # 78
Scenario:
A large multinational organization is rolling out a company-wide AI governance initiative. To build awareness and support adoption, they are evaluating different ways to train employees and stakeholders across departments, including legal, technical, marketing, and customer-facing roles.
Which of the following typical approaches is a large organization least likely to use to responsibly train stakeholders on AI terminology, strategy and governance?
- A. Providing training on AI ethics, based on the extent to which the organization seeks to promote a responsible AI culture
- B. Providing all technical employees education on AI development so they can retool and participate in the development of AI systems
- C. Providing information and education to customers and users to understand the capabilities and limitations of the AI tools with which they interact
- D. Providing role-specific training, based on whether the organization uses a centralized, federated or decentralized governance model
正解：B
解説：
The correct answer is A. While educating technical staff is important, expecting all technical employees to be retooled as AI developers is unrealistic and not aligned with scalable governance practices.
From the AIGP ILT Guide:
"Training approaches should be role-specific and align with the individual's function and responsibilities...
Organizations typically do not expect every technical role to participate in model development." The AI Governance in Practice Report 2024 supports tailored approaches:
"Cross-functional training should be specific to the individual's role and exposure to AI risk... Role-based education supports scalability and comprehension." Thus, broad development training for all technical employees is the least practical and least likely approach.
質問 # 79
......
確認済みAIGP試験問題集と解答で時間限定無料提供！AIGPには正解付き：https://jp.fast2test.com/AIGP-premium-file.html
AIGP試験問題、リアルAIGP練習問題集：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vcrYeZ_VWjf9-rJlhvSq653Ga4VgCVQs