[2026年07月24日] 最新リアルCPHRM試験問題集解答
あなたを簡単に合格させるCPHRM試験問と正確なCertified Professional in Health Care Risk Management (CPHRM)PDF問題
ASHRM CPHRM 認定試験の出題範囲：
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
| トピック 5 |
|
質問 # 56
Which of the following best describes the appropriate scope of a risk manager's involvement in community disaster preparedness?
- A. Calculate the value of human resources, equipment, and supplies consumed, with reimbursement to be obtained from FEMA.
- B. Quantify risk exposures associated with implementing the disaster plan.
- C. Incorporate emergency management into a comprehensive enterprise risk management plan designed to conserve and protect organizational assets.
- D. Analyze liability risks arising from patient harm sustained due to strained or inadequate resources during a mass-casualty event.
正解：C
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management standards endorsed by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, a risk manager's role in community disaster preparedness extends beyond narrow liability analysis. The appropriate scope involves integration of emergency management into the organization's broader enterprise risk management framework.
Enterprise risk management ERM is a structured, organization-wide approach to identifying, assessing, and managing risks that may affect strategic objectives, operations, financial stability, and reputation. Disaster preparedness is a critical operational risk that must be aligned with governance, compliance, continuity planning, and asset protection strategies. By incorporating emergency management into ERM, the risk manager ensures coordination across clinical services, facilities, supply chain, communications, and leadership structures.
Option A focuses only on post-event liability. Option C limits involvement to quantification without strategic integration. Option D addresses reimbursement processes rather than preparedness strategy.
Health Care Operations objectives emphasize collaboration with emergency management teams, regulatory compliance with preparedness standards, and resilience planning to protect patients, staff, and assets.
Therefore, integrating emergency management into a comprehensive enterprise risk management plan best defines the risk manager's appropriate scope of involvement.
質問 # 57
Which type of information was associated with the former HIPDB (now within NPDB) but not the original NPDB focus?
- A. Fraud/abuse-related actions and exclusions involving providers/suppliers (HIPDB purpose)
- B. Restaurant health inspections
- C. Public voter registration files
- D. School disciplinary actions
正解：A
解説：
The HIPDB was established to help combathealthcare fraud and abuse, while the NPDB historically focused on practitioner competence and professional conduct (including items like malpractice payments and certain adverse actions). HRSA explains that HIPDB is no longer separate and that its information is now collected and disclosed through the NPDB following the 2013 merger. For risk managers, the objective is to ensure credentialing, contracting, and compliance teams understand the expanded scope and proper use:
querying supports safer hiring/privileging decisions and reduces negligent credentialing risk, while reporting supports system integrity. Organizations must also ensure due process and correct categorization of reportable events to avoid wrongful reporting exposure.
質問 # 58
In preparing next year's budget, the hospital CFO has contacted the risk manager for a projected contribution to the hospital's professional and general liability self-insured retention fund. To respond to this request, the risk manager should refer to which of the following?
- A. total incurred losses for the current year
- B. actuarial reports and loss runs
- C. professional and general liability premiums
- D. frequency and severity analyses of pending claims
正解：B
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management standards supported by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, projecting contributions to a self-insured retention fund requires actuarially sound financial forecasting. Actuarial reports use historical claims data, trend analyses, loss development factors, and exposure projections to estimate future liabilities and required funding levels. Loss run reports provide detailed historical claims information, including paid losses, reserves, and claim status, which serve as foundational data for actuarial modeling.
Professional and general liability premiums are relevant to insured layers above the retention but do not determine funding requirements for the retained portion. Frequency and severity analyses of pending claims are important components of actuarial evaluation but, standing alone, may not capture long-tail development or incurred but not reported claims. Total incurred losses for the current year provide limited insight without considering historical patterns and future projections.
Risk financing objectives emphasize accurate funding of retained risk to ensure financial stability, regulatory compliance, and protection of organizational assets. Therefore, actuarial reports, supported by comprehensive loss run data, provide the most reliable basis for determining projected contributions to a self-insured retention fund.
質問 # 59
A 22-year-old man has been treated at a hospital for a psychiatric condition. His mother requests that a copy of the patient's medical record be released to her. The risk manager's advice to the medical records department should be to
- A. verify that a specific release of information form has been signed by the patient and then release the medical record.
- B. contact the hospital's legal counsel to authorize the release of the medical record.
- C. check with the psychiatrist for a recommendation to release the medical record.
- D. request evidence that the mother is the guardian of the patient and then release the medical record.
正解：A
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management standards supported by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, a 22-year-old patient is a legal adult and retains full rights to privacy and control over disclosure of protected health information under HIPAA and applicable state confidentiality laws. Psychiatric records are subject to heightened confidentiality protections in many jurisdictions.
Absent a court order or legal guardianship determination, a parent does not have automatic access to an adult child's medical records. Therefore, before releasing any information, the organization must verify that the patient has executed a valid, specific authorization for release of information that complies with HIPAA requirements. The authorization must clearly identify the recipient, the information to be disclosed, and be properly signed and dated.
Consulting legal counsel or a treating psychiatrist does not substitute for proper authorization. Similarly, requesting guardianship documentation would only be appropriate if the mother asserts legal guardianship status; however, in the absence of such documentation, release cannot occur.
Legal and regulatory objectives emphasize strict adherence to privacy laws, protection of psychiatric records, and proper authorization procedures. Therefore, verification of a signed release of information from the patient is required before disclosure.
質問 # 60
Which of the following should prompt a risk manager to give notice to a malpractice carrier?
- A. disclosure to a patient
- B. written medical record request from an attorney
- C. demand letter from a patient
- D. internal incident report
正解：C
解説：
Under Health Care Risk Management principles established by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, timely notice to a malpractice carrier is a critical obligation, particularly under claims-made policies. A demand letter from a patient constitutes a clear assertion of liability and a request for compensation, which typically meets the definition of a claim under most malpractice insurance policies. Failure to notify the carrier promptly may jeopardize coverage.
A written medical record request from an attorney may signal potential litigation, but it does not necessarily constitute a claim unless accompanied by an allegation of wrongdoing or a demand for damages. An internal incident report is a risk management tool used for quality and safety improvement and does not itself trigger insurance notification requirements. Similarly, disclosure to a patient regarding an adverse event aligns with transparency practices but does not automatically represent a formal claim.
Risk management objectives emphasize understanding policy language, particularly definitions of claim and reporting requirements. Because a demand letter explicitly alleges harm and seeks compensation, it most clearly triggers the duty to notify the malpractice carrier to preserve coverage and initiate appropriate claims handling procedures.
質問 # 61
What are risk treatment strategies?
- A. Public relations, branding, advertising
- B. Risk avoidance, risk retention, risk transfer (and risk reduction/mitigation)
- C. Staff vacation scheduling
- D. Litigation, denial, delay
正解：B
解説：
Core risk treatment strategies includeavoidance(stop the activity),reduction/mitigation(controls that reduce likelihood/severity),retention(accept risk within appetite and fund losses via reserves/self-insurance), and transfer(contracts/insurance shifting financial consequences). In healthcare, the highest priority is often mitigation for patient safety risks (standardization, technology, training), with financing mechanisms ensuring the organization can absorb residual loss without destabilizing operations. ERM aligns these strategies to enterprise objectives so leadership invests in the best mix of prevention and financing.
質問 # 62
A hospital risk manager has been called to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit to discuss a 25-week premature infant whose parents are refusing a planned blood transfusion due to their religious beliefs. After gathering information on the infant's condition and hearing the parents and the healthcare professionals disagree on the best interests of the infant, the risk manager should
- A. arrange for an ethics committee consultation to meet the parents and discuss the issue.
- B. prohibit the blood transfusion, respecting the parents' rights as substitute decision-makers for the infant.
- C. advise the care team to proceed with the blood transfusion.
- D. contact legal counsel to arrange for an emergency court hearing to obtain a court order from the state to intervene.
正解：D
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management standards supported by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, while parents generally serve as surrogate decision-makers for minors, their authority is not absolute. When refusal of treatment places a child at significant risk of serious harm or death, healthcare providers have an ethical and legal obligation to act in the best interests of the child.
In cases involving life-sustaining treatment for a premature infant, refusal of a medically necessary blood transfusion may constitute potential medical neglect if it threatens the infant's survival. When disagreement persists after appropriate communication and ethics consultation, and the infant's life is at risk, the appropriate step is to seek judicial intervention. Contacting legal counsel to obtain an emergency court order allows the state to exercise its parens patriae authority to protect the child's welfare.
An ethics consultation may help clarify values and promote dialogue but does not override urgent medical necessity. Simply prohibiting or proceeding without legal authority exposes the organization to liability.
Legal and regulatory objectives emphasize protecting vulnerable patients while respecting due process.
Therefore, seeking an emergency court order through legal counsel is the appropriate action.
質問 # 63
A patient who has suffered a stroke is aphasic and unable to swallow. The physician would like to place a PEG tube for feeding. The patient is considered incapacitated and his wife consents to the treatment. The patient's adult children do not. The wife and oldest daughter each present a power of attorney document identifying them as the designated decision makers. To support the ethical principle of patient autonomy, which of the following should the risk manager recommend?
- A. Tell the family to contact their respective counsel and return when they have worked this issue out.
- B. Check the dates on the documents; the one with the older date is the valid power of attorney.
- C. Refer the matter to the Ethics Committee for resolution.
- D. Check the dates on the documents; the one with the more recent date is the valid power of attorney.
正解：D
解説：
Under Health Care Risk Management principles supported by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, patient autonomy is upheld by honoring valid advance directives and durable powers of attorney for healthcare. When multiple documents are presented that designate different decision makers, the most recent properly executed document typically supersedes earlier versions, unless state law provides otherwise.
Durable powers of attorney for healthcare may be revoked or replaced by executing a newer document.
Therefore, determining the effective document requires reviewing execution dates and ensuring validity under applicable state statutes, including witnessing and notarization requirements. The document with the more recent date generally reflects the patient's latest expressed wishes and controls decision-making authority.
Referring immediately to an ethics committee may be appropriate in unresolved value conflicts, but first establishing legal authority is essential. Asking the family to resolve the dispute independently delays necessary medical decisions and does not clarify legal standing. Selecting the older document would contradict the principle that later directives replace earlier ones.
Legal and regulatory objectives emphasize verification of surrogate authority, compliance with state advance directive laws, and protection of patient autonomy. Therefore, the risk manager should confirm which document is most recent and legally valid.
質問 # 64
What is one advantage of avoluntaryerror reporting system over amandatoryerror reporting system?
- A. Voluntary systems eliminate the need for root cause analysis
- B. Voluntary systems guarantee legal privilege in all states
- C. Voluntary systems typically elicit more frontline reports and near-misses
- D. Voluntary systems replace peer review and credentialing
正解：C
解説：
Voluntary reporting systems often generatemore reports, especially ofnear-misses and low-harm events, because staff perceive less punitive risk and greater learning value. This is crucial for proactive risk management: near-misses expose weak signals and system vulnerabilities before a patient is harmed. A robust voluntary culture supports a "just culture" approach-encouraging reporting while still holding people accountable for reckless behavior. Compared with mandatory systems (typically limited to defined serious events), voluntary systems improve the organization's ability to identify patterns (communication failures, workflow traps, labeling issues, staffing risks), prioritize interventions, and measure improvement over time.
Risk management objectives include earlier hazard detection, better trend analysis, and stronger safety culture. To maximize effectiveness, leadership must provide feedback loops ("you reported, we improved"), protect confidentiality where permitted, and couple reporting with structured analysis (RCA/FMEA). While voluntary reporting does not automatically confer legal privilege, it is a foundational learning system in high- reliability healthcare operations.
質問 # 65
The following is a table of expense and indemnity figures for an organization's last 6 years.
What is the ratio of total incurred expense to total incurred indemnity for Year 4?
- A. 3.23
- B. 0.18
- C. 0.15
- D. 0.20
正解：D
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management principles supported by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, total incurred amounts include both paid amounts and reserves. Incurred expense equals expense paid plus expense reserves. Incurred indemnity equals indemnity paid plus indemnity reserves.
For Year 4:
Total incurred expense = $25,000 reserves + $15,000 paid = $40,000.
Total incurred indemnity = $150,000 reserves + $75,000 paid = $225,000.
The ratio of total incurred expense to total incurred indemnity is calculated as:
$40,000 ÷ $225,000 = 0.1778, which rounds to approximately 0.18.
However, among the answer options provided, the closest value is 0.20 only if rounded broadly. Since precise calculation yields approximately 0.18, the mathematically correct ratio is approximately 0.18.
In risk financing analysis, expense-to-indemnity ratios help evaluate claims handling efficiency and cost allocation. Monitoring this ratio assists in forecasting defense costs, evaluating litigation management strategies, and supporting actuarial review. Accurate calculation of incurred values is essential for financial planning and reserve adequacy assessment.
質問 # 66
An HMO advertises it is "the best" and its physicians can manage any illness/injury. A patient relies on this and is injured. The patient might sue the HMO for:
- A. Only weather damage
- B. Apparent agency / negligent misrepresentation / vicarious liability (depending on facts and jurisdiction)
- C. Only EMTALA penalties
- D. Only OSHA violations
正解：B
解説：
Marketing claims can create liability exposure when they reasonably induce reliance and the patient suffers harm. Depending on jurisdiction and facts, plaintiffs may allegeapparent agency(belief that physicians acted as the HMO's agents),vicarious liability, negligent credentialing, or negligent misrepresentation/consumer protection claims if statements are misleading. Risk management objectives include reviewing public claims for accuracy, ensuring marketing does not overpromise clinical capability, and aligning network adequacy and credentialing with representations. Clear disclosures about independent contractors may help but do not always defeat apparent agency claims. Controls include legal review of advertising, credentialing rigor, quality oversight, and complaint surveillance to detect mismatches between marketing and actual service capability.
質問 # 67
All of the following are valid reasons for performing risk management review of policies and procedures EXCEPT
- A. monitoring compliance with standards.
- B. ensuring consistency between practice and policy.
- C. identifying potential risk exposures.
- D. maintaining staff competency.
正解：D
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management standards supported by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, periodic review of policies and procedures is essential to ensure alignment with current laws, regulatory standards, accreditation requirements, and best practices. Reviewing policies helps ensure consistency between written procedures and actual clinical practice, thereby reducing liability exposure.
Policy review also supports identification of potential risk exposures by detecting outdated language, conflicting guidance, or gaps in processes that could lead to adverse events. Additionally, monitoring compliance with standards-such as federal regulations, state statutes, and accreditation requirements-is a central purpose of policy review, ensuring that organizational practices meet required benchmarks.
Maintaining staff competency, however, is primarily addressed through education, training programs, credentialing, and performance evaluation processes. While policies provide guidance for staff conduct, competency assessment is not the primary objective of policy review itself.
Health Care Operations objectives emphasize governance oversight, regulatory compliance, and risk mitigation through clear, current policies. Therefore, maintaining staff competency is not a direct reason for performing risk management review of policies and procedures, making it the correct exception.
質問 # 68
Which of the following concepts is integral to supporting a Safety Culture in a healthcare organization?
- A. speaking up
- B. trending occurrences
- C. disciplining an employee
- D. assigning blame
正解：A
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management standards supported by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, a culture of safety is grounded in open communication, transparency, and shared accountability. An essential element of safety culture is the expectation that all staff members feel empowered and psychologically safe to speak up about concerns, near misses, unsafe conditions, or potential errors without fear of retaliation.
Speaking up supports early identification of risks and fosters continuous improvement. It aligns with just culture principles, which distinguish between human error, at-risk behavior, and reckless conduct, promoting learning rather than automatic punishment. Encouraging staff to voice concerns strengthens teamwork, situational awareness, and patient-centered care.
While trending occurrences is an important analytical tool for quality improvement, it is a process measure rather than a core cultural principle. Disciplining employees and assigning blame, when applied indiscriminately, undermine trust and discourage reporting, thereby weakening safety culture.
Clinical and patient safety objectives emphasize communication, accountability, and nonpunitive reporting environments. Therefore, speaking up is integral to supporting and sustaining a safety culture within a healthcare organization.
質問 # 69
Which of the following isnotone of the patient rights enumerated in the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA)?
- A. The right to select any medication the patient wants
- B. The right to refuse treatment through an advance directive (where applicable)
- C. The right to receive information about advance directives
- D. The right to participate in decisions about medical care
正解：A
解説：
The PSDA focuses onpatient autonomy and informed decision-making, especially aroundadvance directives. It requires certain healthcare organizations to inform patients of their rights under state law to make decisions about medical care, ask whether the patient has an advance directive, document it, and avoid discrimination based on whether an advance directive exists. The Act doesnotcreate a right for patients to select any medication they want irrespective of clinical appropriateness, prescribing laws, formularies, allergies, contraindications, or standards of care. Risk management objectives here include: ensuring compliant admission workflows (education + documentation), reducing disputes through early clarification of preferences, and preventing ethical/legal breakdowns during incapacity. Operationally, PSDA compliance improves care planning, reduces unwanted treatment, and lowers complaint/litigation risk by showing the organization respected patient rights and followed required processes.
質問 # 70
According to The Joint Commission, which of the following should be done to patient-owned electrical devices entering the facility?
- A. inventory with patient belongings
- B. conduct an electrical safety inspection
- C. tag by biomedical engineering
- D. sequester the electrical device
正解：B
質問 # 71
Which of the following items should be part of a claim file?
* peer review reports or data
* correspondence with attorneys and investigators
* literature search
* verification of settlement authority
- A. 1, 2, and 3 only
- B. 1, 2, and 4 only
- C. 2, 3, and 4 only
- D. 1, 3, and 4 only
正解：C
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management standards outlined by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, claim files must be carefully structured to preserve confidentiality, protect privilege, and support effective defense strategy. A claim file typically includes correspondence with attorneys and investigators, as this documentation reflects legal strategy, communications, and case development. Literature searches relevant to standards of care may also be included to assist counsel in evaluating clinical issues and expert testimony preparation. Verification of settlement authority is essential documentation to confirm that appropriate approvals were obtained before resolving a claim.
Peer review reports or data, however, should not be included in the claim file. Peer review materials are generally protected under state peer review statutes and federal patient safety privilege provisions.
Commingling peer review documents within the claims file may jeopardize privilege protections and increase the risk of discoverability in litigation. Maintaining separation between peer review files and claim files is a critical risk management practice.
Claims and litigation objectives emphasize preservation of privilege, organized documentation, and compliance with legal standards. Therefore, correspondence, literature searches, and settlement authority verification belong in the claim file, while peer review reports should be maintained separately.
質問 # 72
A root cause analysis of inpatient suicides would be most likely to discover problems with:
- A. Billing documentation
- B. Dietary preferences
- C. Parking access
- D. The physical environment (e.g., ligature points, visibility)
正解：D
解説：
Inpatient suicide prevention is a high-stakes patient safety domain where RCAs frequently identify environmental hazards-particularly ligature risks, blind spots, and unit design that limits observation. Joint Commission-style reviews and published analyses note that thephysical environmentis commonly
"incriminated" in inpatient suicides, emphasizing design/engineering controls alongside clinical monitoring.
Risk management objectives prioritize layered defenses: ligature-resistant fixtures, environmental rounding, safe room standards, removal control for risky items, and observation policies matched to patient risk.
Environmental mitigation is especially powerful because it reduces reliance on perfect human vigilance (which is not realistic). By treating suicide prevention as a systems problem-not an individual failure- organizations improve reliability and reduce recurrence. Environmental corrections also strengthen regulatory readiness and demonstrate that the facility addressed known hazards with sustainable controls.
質問 # 73
The enterprise risk management process extends beyond clinical risk management by
- A. analyzing the organization's medication administration program.
- B. comparing the organization's internal and external environment for efficacy.
- C. ensuring its strategic priority at the senior leadership and governance levels.
- D. maintaining risks in silos as the best risk management approach.
正解：C
質問 # 74
A claims manager needs to open a loss reserve and perform an investigation of an event. They review the patient demographics, the nature and extent of the injury, and other liability factors. Which of the following would be helpful to the claims manager in determining a loss reserve?
- A. the surgery center's claims history
- B. amount of insurance allowed per occurrence
- C. the patient's total medical bills
- D. comparable verdicts in the county
正解：D
解説：
Within Health Care Risk Management practice as outlined by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, establishing an accurate loss reserve requires an estimation of the probable financial exposure associated with a claim. A loss reserve represents the anticipated cost to resolve a claim, including indemnity payments and defense expenses.
Comparable verdicts in the county are particularly useful because they reflect jurisdiction-specific jury tendencies, local legal climate, and historical award patterns. Venue significantly influences claim valuation, as jury awards can vary substantially between counties and states. Reviewing similar case outcomes allows the claims manager to benchmark potential settlement or verdict ranges based on injury severity and liability factors.
The surgery center's claims history may inform overall risk trends but does not directly determine the value of a specific claim. The patient's total medical bills are relevant but represent only one component of damages and do not account for non-economic damages such as pain and suffering. The insurance limit per occurrence defines maximum exposure but does not guide the realistic reserve estimate unless damages approach policy limits.
Therefore, analysis of comparable local verdicts is most helpful in establishing an appropriate and defensible loss reserve.
質問 # 75
Which of the following analyses is required as part of the sentinel event process of The Joint Commission?
- A. fishbone diagram of the causal factors
- B. action plan listing the steps for improvement and the dates of implementation for each step
- C. flow chart listing the responsibilities for each of the departments involved
- D. Pareto chart outlining the problems identified and the priorities for improvement
正解：B
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management standards supported by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, The Joint Commission's sentinel event process requires completion of a thorough root cause analysis and development of a corrective action plan. While various analytical tools such as fishbone diagrams, flowcharts, or Pareto charts may be used to assist in identifying contributing factors, these specific tools are not mandated.
The essential required component is a written action plan that identifies specific improvement steps, assigns responsibility, and includes measurable outcomes and timelines for implementation. The action plan must address root causes and system vulnerabilities, not merely individual performance issues. It should demonstrate how corrective actions will reduce the likelihood of recurrence and include monitoring mechanisms to evaluate effectiveness.
Fishbone diagrams and Pareto charts are optional tools used during analysis but are not explicitly required elements. Similarly, departmental flowcharts may support understanding of processes but are not mandated by The Joint Commission.
Clinical and patient safety objectives emphasize systematic investigation, leadership oversight, and documented improvement efforts following sentinel events. Therefore, a detailed action plan with implementation dates is the required analysis component within the sentinel event process.
質問 # 76
An emergency department physician has evaluated and stabilized a patient who needs a sign language interpreter. The on-call physician is consulted for admission. Which of the following regulatory laws are most relevant?
- A. HCQIA and ADA
- B. HIPAA and HCQIA
- C. EMTALA/COBRA and HIPAA
- D. ADA and EMTALA/COBRA
正解：D
解説：
Under Health Care Risk Management standards supported by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, two federal laws are most directly implicated in this scenario: the Americans with Disabilities Act ADA and the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act EMTALA, formerly enacted under COBRA.
EMTALA requires hospitals with emergency departments to provide an appropriate medical screening examination, stabilization of emergency medical conditions, and appropriate transfer or admission regardless of ability to pay. Since the emergency physician has evaluated and stabilized the patient and the on-call physician is being consulted for admission, EMTALA obligations remain central to ensuring compliant continuation of care.
The ADA is also directly relevant because it mandates that health care organizations provide reasonable accommodations to individuals with disabilities, including effective communication. For a patient requiring a sign language interpreter, the hospital must provide appropriate auxiliary aids and services to ensure meaningful access to care.
HIPAA relates primarily to privacy and protected health information, while HCQIA addresses peer review immunity and credentialing matters. Therefore, ADA and EMTALA are the most relevant regulatory frameworks in this case.
質問 # 77
Which of the following is the most reliable measure of the effectiveness of an educational program?
- A. analysis of written evaluations
- B. observable changes in human behavior
- C. reduced frequency of claims or suits
- D. reduced severity of claims or suits
正解：B
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management principles endorsed by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, the effectiveness of an educational program is best measured by demonstrated changes in behavior rather than by subjective or indirect outcomes. Educational initiatives in healthcare risk management aim to improve compliance, enhance patient safety practices, and modify unsafe behaviors.
Analysis of written evaluations primarily reflects participant satisfaction and perceived value of the program, but does not confirm that learning objectives were achieved or that behaviors changed. Reductions in claim frequency or severity are important organizational outcomes; however, these are influenced by multiple variables beyond education alone, including patient volume, case complexity, legal climate, and system-level interventions. Therefore, claims data are indirect and delayed measures.
Observable changes in human behavior, such as improved adherence to safety protocols, increased incident reporting, or consistent compliance with documentation standards, provide direct evidence that learning has translated into practice. Risk management objectives emphasize measurable performance improvement, competency validation, and alignment with patient safety goals.
Thus, observable behavioral change is the most reliable and immediate indicator that an educational program has achieved its intended effect.
質問 # 78
A risk manager identifies a problem with the informed consent process in the organization. All of the following are appropriate interventions EXCEPT
- A. reporting physicians with incomplete consent forms to the appropriate peer review committee.
- B. reviewing and revising the informed consent policies and procedures.
- C. conducting a medical record audit to ascertain completeness of consent forms.
- D. educating medical, nursing, and physician office staff on components of the informed consent process.
正解：A
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management standards endorsed by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, system-level issues in the informed consent process should first be addressed through quality improvement and educational interventions rather than immediate punitive action.
Conducting a medical record audit is an appropriate first step to identify patterns of incomplete documentation and determine whether the problem is isolated or systemic. Reviewing and revising policies and procedures ensures alignment with current legal standards and clarifies responsibilities for obtaining and documenting consent. Providing targeted education to physicians, nurses, and office staff reinforces understanding of required elements, including discussion of risks, benefits, alternatives, and patient questions.
Reporting physicians with incomplete consent forms directly to peer review may be appropriate in cases of persistent noncompliance or willful disregard of standards. However, when a systemic process problem is identified, immediate referral to peer review is not the appropriate primary intervention and may undermine a just culture approach.
Clinical and patient safety objectives emphasize root cause identification, education, and process improvement before disciplinary escalation. Therefore, reporting physicians to peer review in this context represents the inappropriate intervention.
質問 # 79
A hospital's blood transfusions are99.7% error-free. Which function best estimates how many transfusions are likely before an error occurs?
- A. Chi-square test
- B. Multinomial distribution
- C. Linear regression
- D. Geometric distribution (time until first failure)
正解：D
解説：
If each transfusion has an independent probability of error, the number of transfusions until thefirsterror is modeled by thegeometric distribution, which describes "trials until first failure." The expected number of transfusions before an error is approximately, so. Risk management objectives use this type of reliability thinking to convert percentages into operational intuition: "Even a 0.3% error rate becomes a predictable event in high-volume processes." That insight supports prioritizing controls (barcoding, two-person verification, bedside ID checks, standardized labeling, transfusion time-outs) because rare-event rates still produce real harm over time. Interpreting reliability this way also helps boards and leaders understand that
"99.x%" can be unsafe in critical processes and that system redesign is often necessary to reach high reliability.
質問 # 80
A patient has been declared brain dead as a result of injuries sustained during a criminal act. His driver's license states that he is an organ donor. The attending physician is planning to remove the life-support equipment. A risk manager should recommend
- A. determining the family's wishes regarding organ donation.
- B. coordinating the organ retrieval.
- C. notifying authorities to determine if an autopsy is required.
- D. following the patient's wishes and notify the organ retrieval team.
正解：C
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management standards established by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, deaths resulting from criminal acts fall under medico-legal jurisdiction and are typically subject to coroner or medical examiner review. Even when a patient is a documented organ donor, as indicated on a driver's license under the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act framework, the circumstances of death may require legal investigation.
When a death is associated with trauma from a criminal act, it is generally considered a reportable death. The medical examiner or coroner has statutory authority to determine whether an autopsy is required and to ensure preservation of forensic evidence. Organ procurement activities must not interfere with legal investigation obligations. Therefore, prior to organ retrieval or withdrawal of life support, the appropriate legal authorities must be notified.
While honoring the patient's documented donation wishes is important, compliance with state statutes governing reportable deaths and forensic investigations takes precedence. The family's wishes do not override a valid donor designation, but coordination must occur within the legal framework.
Thus, the most appropriate action for the risk manager is to ensure that authorities are notified to determine autopsy requirements before proceeding.
質問 # 81
......
CPHRM認証試験問題集の解答を提供しています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1cUfmdv9liAhPC6ed3t4U68QmIYSYpAMT
更新されたCPHRM試験練習テスト問題：https://jp.fast2test.com/CPHRM-premium-file.html