2026年最新の認定サンプル問題SSE-Engineer問題集と練習試験合格させます
SSE-Engineer豪華セット学習ガイドにはオンライン試験エンジン
Palo Alto Networks SSE-Engineer 認定試験の出題範囲：
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
質問 # 25
A company has four branch offices between Canada Central and Canada East which use the same IPSec termination node and have QoS configured with customized bandwidth per site. An engineer wants to onboard a new branch office on the same IPSec termination node.
What is the QoS behavior for the new branch office?
- A. Automatically distributed to 25% for each site
- B. Automatically distributed to 20% for each site
- C. Cannot be added to existing QoS configuration
- D. Unallocated until manually assigned
正解：D
解説：
When onboarding a new branch office to anexisting IPSec termination nodeinPrisma Access, theQoS bandwidth is not automatically assigned. Instead, the newly added branchremains unallocateduntil the administratormanually assigns bandwidthwithin theQoS configuration settings. This ensures that customized bandwidth per siteremains intact and allows forfine-tuned traffic managementbased on business needs.
質問 # 26
A user connected to Prisma Access reports that traffic intermittently is denied after matching a Catch-All Deny rule at the bottom and bypassing HIP-based policies. Refreshing VPN connection restores the access.
What are two reasons for this behavior? (Choose two.)
- A. Firewall loses user mapping due to missed HIP report checks.
- B. " Collect HIP data " needs to be enabled in the configuration.
- C. User mapping is learned from sources other than gateway authentication.
- D. HIP-enforced policy is scheduled for certain hours of the day.
正解：A、C
解説：
The reported symptom - traffic intermittently falling through to the bottom Catch-All Deny rule, bypassing the HIP-based policy that should be matching first, and being resolved simply by refreshing the VPN connection - is a classic signature of stale or lost user-to-IP mapping combined with expired HIP state, rather than a fundamental policy configuration error, which is why refreshing the session (forcing re- authentication and a fresh HIP report) restores correct behavior. If user mapping for the connected session is being learned or refreshed from a source other than the gateway ' s own authentication event (for example, User-ID redistribution or another mapping source with different timing or reliability characteristics than the gateway ' s native session state), that mapping can become inconsistent with the live GlobalProtect session, causing the HIP-enforced rule ' s user-based match criteria to intermittently fail - this is option B.
Separately, the firewall periodically expects HIP report checks from the connected endpoint to keep its HIP- based match state current; if a report check is missed due to a client-side timing issue or transient connectivity blip, the firewall can lose the HIP match state for that session even though the tunnel itself remains up, causing subsequent traffic to fail HIP-based rule matching and fall through to the deny-all rule - this is option C. " Collect HIP data " not being enabled (option A) would cause a total, consistent failure to match HIP-based policy from the outset, not the intermittent pattern described. A time-of-day schedule on the HIP rule (option D) would produce a predictable, not intermittent and refresh-resolved, pattern of denial.
Reference:GlobalProtect - HIP-Based Policy Troubleshooting, User-ID Mapping Consistency.
質問 # 27
A company has four branch offices between Canada Central and Canada East which use the same IPSec termination node and have QoS configured with customized bandwidth per site. An engineer wants to onboard a new branch office on the same IPSec termination node. What is the QoS behavior for the new branch office?
- A. Automatically distributed to 25% for each site
- B. Automatically distributed to 20% for each site
- C. Cannot be added to existing QoS configuration
- D. Unallocated until manually assigned
正解：D
解説：
Once an administrator has moved away from Prisma Access ' s default, automatic bandwidth-sharing behavior and explicitly customized bandwidth allocation per site on a shared IPSec termination node, the platform respects that deliberate, manual configuration rather than silently recalculating or redistributing percentages whenever a new site is added to the same node. Onboarding a fifth branch office onto a termination node where the existing four sites already have customized, fixed bandwidth values does not trigger an automatic rebalancing to a new even split; instead, the new site simply has no bandwidth allocation defined for it and will remain unallocated, effectively receiving no guaranteed or prioritized QoS treatment, until the engineer explicitly assigns it a bandwidth value as part of onboarding. This makes option B the accurate description of default platform behavior. Options A and C both describe an automatic, evenly-redistributed percentage outcome (25% and 20% respectively, which would correspond to five equal shares or four equal shares) that does not reflect how customized QoS interacts with new site onboarding - automatic even redistribution is the behavior only when no manual customization has been introduced in the first place, and once customization exists, the platform does not silently override or reflow it. Option D is incorrect because new branch offices absolutely can be added to an IPSec termination node with existing customized QoS; the addition itself is fully supported, it simply requires the administrator to manually define that site ' s bandwidth.
Reference:Prisma Access Remote Networks - QoS Bandwidth Allocation per IPSec Termination Node.
質問 # 28
Which two actions can a company with Prisma Access deployed take to use the Egress IP API to automate policy rule updates when the IP addresses used by Prisma Access change? (Choose two.)
- A. Configure a webhook to receive notifications of IP address changes.
- B. Copy the Egress IP API Key in the service infrastructure settings.
- C. Download a client certificate to authenticate to the Egress IP API.
- D. Enable the Egress IP API endpoint in Prisma Access.
正解：A、C
解説：
Configuring a webhook allows the company to receive real-time notifications when Prisma Access changes its egress IP addresses, ensuring that policy rules are updated automatically. Downloading a client certificate is necessary for authentication to the Egress IP API, allowing secure API access for retrieving updated IP addresses. These actions ensure that security policies remain effective without manual intervention.
質問 # 29
A customer is implementing Prisma Access (Managed by Strata Cloud Manager) to connect mobile users, branch locations, and business-to-business (B2B) partners to its data centers. [Scenario as before, with overlapping prefixes advertised by B2B partners.] Which two actions will meet the customer requirements for the B2B connections? (Choose two.)
- A. NAT the traffic at the customer premises equipment (CPE).
- B. Advertise the corresponding network prefixes using eBGP or static routes.
- C. Configure remote networks with NAT pools for each of the B2B connections.
- D. Configure service connections for data center connectivity.
正解：B、C
質問 # 30
What will cause a connector to fail to establish a connection with the cloud gateway during the deployment of a new ZTNA Connector in a data center?
- A. The connector is using a dynamic IP address.
- B. The connector is deployed behind a double NAT.
- C. There is a misconfiguration in the DNS settings on the connector.
- D. There is a high latency in the network connection.
正解：B
解説：
AZTNA Connectorrequires astable and direct connectionto thecloud gateway. When the connector is deployed behind adouble NAT (Network Address Translation), it can cause issues withreachability and session establishmentbecause the cloud gateway may not be able to properly identify and communicate with the connector. Double NAT can interfere withsecure tunneling, IP address resolution, and authentication mechanisms, leading toconnection failures. To resolve this, the connector should be placed in a network segment witha single NAT or a public IP assignment.
質問 # 31
Which two Prisma Access Browser (PAB) configurations will provide a contractor SSH access to an internal system? (Choose two.)
- A. Configure Internal Application entries, Configure Access & Data Control policy
- B. Enable Internal Connections
- C. Enable Remote Connections
- D. Configure Remote Connection Application entries, Configure Access & Data Control policy
正解：C、D
解説：
SSH is fundamentally different from a standard HTTP/HTTPS-based internal web application, since it is a non-web, terminal-based protocol, and PAB accommodates protocols like SSH and RDP through a distinct capability generally referred to as Remote Connections rather than the standard internal web application publishing workflow. Enabling Remote Connections is the prerequisite platform capability that allows PAB to broker non-web protocol sessions such as SSH at all, making option B a necessary first configuration step.
Once that capability is enabled, the administrator must define the actual target system as a Remote Connection Application entry - specifying the internal host, port, and protocol (SSH in this case) the contractor needs to reach - and then build an Access & Data Control policy that authorizes the specific contractor or contractor group to reach that defined Remote Connection application entry, which is exactly what option C describes and is the configuration pairing that actually grants and governs the access. Option A describes " Internal Application entries " rather than " Remote Connection Application entries " - internal (web) application entries are the construct used for standard HTTP/HTTPS internal application publishing, not SSH, so this pairing misapplies the wrong application object type to a non-web protocol use case. Option D references " Internal Connections " as a toggle, which is not the correctly named capability for enabling non-web protocol brokering in PAB; the documented feature and terminology for SSH/RDP-style access is Remote Connections, not " Internal Connections. " Reference:Prisma Access Browser - Remote Connections for SSH/RDP Access to Internal Systems.
質問 # 32
What is the purpose of embargo rules in Prisma Access?
- A. Allowing traffic only from specific countries
- B. Blocking traffic from Russia, China, and North Korea only
- C. Blocking connections from specific countries
- D. Rate-limiting connections originating from specific countries
正解：C
解説：
Embargo rules are a purpose-built, pre-defined Security policy rule construct in Prisma Access that lets an organization block inbound connection attempts - most commonly authentication attempts against the GlobalProtect portal, Explicit Proxy, or Remote Networks entry points - that originate from specific countries or regions, using Palo Alto Networks ' geolocation-based source address matching. Their defining behavior is unconditional blocking (a Drop action) of the specified source countries, which makes option C the accurate general description of their purpose; they exist to reduce attack surface against brute-force and credential-stuffing attempts by preventing connection attempts before normal identity-based Security policy would even be evaluated, since embargo rules are enforced as top-of-stack pre-rules using the reserved tag PA_predefined_embargo_rule. Option A is incorrect because embargo rules are a binary block mechanism, not a rate-limiting or throttling control - there is no partial-restriction behavior involved. Option B inverts the logic entirely; embargo rules are not an allow-list mechanism restricting traffic to only a permitted set of countries, they are a deny-list mechanism for specific countries while leaving all other geographies unaffected. Option D is too narrow and factually incorrect as a generalization: embargo rules are configurable for any country or region the organization chooses to specify, and are frequently used for the broader set of countries subject to export or sanctions restrictions, not a fixed three-country list.
Reference:Prisma Access - Block Incoming Connections from Specific Countries (Embargo Rules).
質問 # 33
An organization deploys the Prisma Access Browser (PAB) to secure web access from diverse endpoints, including personal devices where IT has limited control. To maintain a strong and proactive security posture across these varied environments, why is the use of PAB device posture attributes, such as OS version, file system encryption, and device type, considered essential?
- A. It provides the administrators of PAB the ability to enable disk encryption on all endpoints.
- B. It allows administrators to identify and restrict access based on OS version and browser type on unmanaged devices.
- C. It permits PAB to function as a standalone endpoint detection and response (EDR) solution.
- D. It enables the administrators of PAB to independently perform OS and browser patching on unmanaged devices.
正解：B
解説：
Because PAB is frequently deployed to secure access from BYOD and other endpoints where IT lacks the administrative rights to directly manage, configure, or remediate the device, the value of device posture attributes lies specifically in visibility and conditional access - not remediation. By collecting signals such as OS version, file system encryption state, and device type, PAB gives administrators the information needed to make risk-based access decisions, such as denying or restricting access to sensitive applications from devices running outdated, vulnerable operating system versions, or from device types the organization considers higher risk, even though IT cannot directly touch or manage the underlying device. This read-and-restrict model is precisely what option C describes, and it reflects the actual, realistic capability of a posture-attribute- based access control system operating on unmanaged endpoints. Option A overstates PAB ' s function; it is not a standalone EDR solution, since EDR involves active threat detection, investigation, and endpoint-level response capabilities that PAB, as a browser-centric security control, does not provide. Option B is incorrect because PAB has no ability to remotely enable disk encryption on a device it does not manage - posture attributes are read for assessment purposes, not pushed as configuration changes to unmanaged endpoints.
Option D is similarly incorrect; PAB cannot perform OS or browser patching on devices outside of IT ' s administrative control, since doing so would require management-level access the organization explicitly does not have on personal or unmanaged devices.
Reference:Prisma Access Browser - Device Posture Attributes for Conditional Access on Unmanaged Devices.
質問 # 34
A malicious user is attempting to connect to a blocked website by crafting a packet using a fake SNI and the correct website in the HTTP host header.
Which option will prevent this form of attack?
- A. Advanced Threat Prevention option to block "Domain Fronting"
- B. Advanced URL Filtering and block the "Malicious Behavior" category
- C. SSL Decryption to "Block sessions on SNI mismatch with Server Certificate (SAN/CN)"
- D. Advanced URL Filtering and block "SNI mismatch with Server Certificate (SAN/CN)"
正解：C
解説：
This option ensures thatSSL Decryptionchecks for mismatches between theServer Name Indication (SNI) fieldin the TLS handshake and theCommon Name (CN) or Subject Alternative Name (SAN) in the server certificate. If a malicious user tries to bypass content filtering by spoofing theSNI while using the real blocked website in the HTTP host header, this setting will detect the discrepancy andblock the session, preventing unauthorized access.
質問 # 35
A customer is implementing Prisma Access (Managed by Strata Cloud Manager) to connect mobile users, branch locations, and business-to-business (B2B) partners to their data centers. The solution must meet these requirements: The mobile users must have internet filtering, data center connectivity, and remote site connectivity to the branch locations. The branch locations must have internet filtering and data center connectivity. The B2B partner connections must only have access to specific data center internally developed applications running on non-standard ports. The security team must have access to manage the mobile user and access to branch locations. The network team must have access to manage only the partner access. How can the engineer configure mobile users and branch locations to meet the requirements?
- A. Use Explicit Proxy to filter internet traffic and provide access to data center resources using service connections.
- B. Use Explicit Proxy and Remote Networks to filter internet traffic and provide access to data center resources using service connections.
- C. Use GlobalProtect to filter internet traffic and provide access to data center resources using service connections.
- D. Use GlobalProtect and Remote Networks to filter internet traffic and provide access to data center resources using service connections.
正解：D
解説：
GlobalProtect is the correct mobile-user connection method here because the requirement explicitly calls for remote site connectivity from mobile users to the branch locations, in addition to internet filtering and data center access - a full-tunnel capability that Explicit Proxy, which is scoped to web/proxy-aware traffic only, cannot provide. Remote Networks is the purpose-built onboarding method for the branch locations, tunneling their traffic into Prisma Access over IPSec for consistent internet filtering and, through the shared backbone, reachability to data center resources. Service connections are the piece that stitches both populations to the data center: they terminate at the customer ' s HQ/data center and, once established, become reachable from both the GlobalProtect mobile user pool and the Remote Networks locations across the Prisma Access backbone, satisfying the data center connectivity requirement for both user types without requiring a dedicated tunnel per site. Option B and D are eliminated because Explicit Proxy cannot deliver full network- layer access to internal branch or data center resources; it is designed for outbound web traffic redirection via PAC file or forwarding profile, not IPSec-based site-to-site or full-tunnel remote access. Option C omits Remote Networks entirely, which would leave the branch offices unconnected. GlobalProtect plus Remote Networks plus service connections is the standard, minimal-footprint design pattern for this exact hybrid mobile-user/branch/data-center topology.
Reference:Prisma Access Mobile Users (GlobalProtect) and Prisma Access Remote Networks - Deployment Fundamentals.
質問 # 36
How can a network security team be granted full administrative access to a tenant's configuration while restricting access to other tenants by using role-based access control (RBAC) for Panorama Managed Prisma Access in a multitenant environment?
- A. Create an Access Domain and restrict access to only the Device Groups and Templates for the Target Tenant.
- B. Create a custom role with Device Group and Template privileges and assign it to the security team's user accounts.
- C. Set the administrative accounts for the security team to the "Superuser" role.
- D. Create a custom role enabling all privileges within the specific tenant's scope and assign it to the security team's user accounts.
正解：A
解説：
In aPanorama Managed Prisma Access multitenant environment,Access Domainsprovide granularrole- based access control (RBAC). By defining anAccess Domain, the network security team can be granted full administrative privileges for aspecific tenant's configurationwhile ensuring theycannot access or modify other tenants. This method enforces proper segmentation andensures compliance with multitenant security policies.
質問 # 37
What must be configured to accurately report an application's availability when onboarding a discovered application for ZTNA Connector?
- A. icmp ping
- B. tcp ping
- C. udp ping
- D. https ping
正解：B
解説：
When onboarding a discovered application forZTNA Connector, configuring aTCP pingallows Prisma Access to accurately report the application'savailability.TCP ping(also known as aTCP connection check) verifies whether the application's service port isopen and responsive, ensuring that the application is reachable before allowing user connections. This method is more reliable thanICMP ping, as many cloud and SaaS applicationsblock ICMP trafficfor security reasons.
質問 # 38
What is the impact of selecting the " Disable Server Response Inspection " checkbox after confirming that a Security policy rule has a threat protection profile configured?
- A. The threat protection profile will override the " Disable Server Response Inspection " only for HTTP traffic from the server to the client.
- B. All traffic from the server to the client will bypass threat inspection.
- C. Only HTTP traffic from the server to the client will bypass threat inspection.
- D. The threat protection profile will override the " Disable Server Response Inspection " for all traffic from the server to the client.
正解：B
解説：
Disable Server Response Inspection (DSRI) is a performance-oriented Security policy rule setting that instructs the firewall to skip Layer 7 content inspection - which includes both App-ID continuation and all threat signature matching - on the server-to-client leg of a session, regardless of the application or protocol in use. Once enabled on a rule, it applies uniformly to every session matching that rule, not selectively to HTTP; protocols such as SMB and FTP, which are chatty in the return direction and commonly the reason DSRI is enabled in the first place, are affected exactly the same way as any other server-to-client flow. This makes option C the accurate description: all server-to-client traffic on that rule bypasses threat inspection, full stop. This is precisely why DSRI carries an operational risk that engineers must weigh deliberately: attaching a Threat Prevention profile to the same rule does not re-enable inspection or " win out " over the DSRI setting in any direction, which eliminates options B and D - the two settings are not designed to arbitrate against each other, and DSRI simply takes precedence for the return traffic. Because of this, DSRI should only ever be applied to rules governing traffic to servers that are already fully trusted, since checking the box removes visibility into exploits, malware, and data returned from that server regardless of any other profile attached to the rule.
Reference:PAN-OS Security Policy - Disable Server Response Inspection (DSRI) Behavior and Best Practice Assessment Checks.
質問 # 39
A customer is implementing Prisma Access (Managed by Strata Cloud Manager) to connect mobile users, branch locations, and business-to- business (B2B) partners to their data centers.
* The solution must meet these requirements:
* The mobile users must have internet filtering, data center connectivity, and remote site connectivity to the branch locations.
* The branch locations must have internet filtering and data center connectivity.
* The B2B partner connections must only have access to specific data center internally developed applications running on non-standard ports.
* The security team must have access to manage the mobile user and access to branch locations.
* The network team must have access to manage only the partner access.
Which two components can be provisioned to enable data center connectivity over the internet? (Choose two.)
- A. ZTNA Connector
- B. SD-WAN Connector
- C. Service connections
- D. Colo-Connect
正解：C、D
解説：
Service connections enable secure connectivity between Prisma Access and on-premises data centers, allowing mobile users and branch locations to access internal applications. They facilitate seamless integration of internal networks with Prisma Access while maintaining security policies. Colo-Connect provides a dedicated and optimized pathway for traffic between Prisma Access and data centers, ensuring stable performance and reduced latency over the internet. Both components together support secure and efficient data center connectivity while aligning with the customer's access control and filtering requirements.
質問 # 40
After configuring domain-based split tunnel for zoom.us, how is expected behavior on the client machine confirmed?
- A. Ping zoom.us from the CLI.
- B. Verify zoom.us is resolved by the tunnel assigned DNS server.
- C. Enable dump level logs on GlobalProtect Application.
- D. Verify from the routing table.
正解：D
解説：
After configuringdomain-based split tunnelingforzoom.us, the expected behavior can be confirmed by checking therouting table on the client machine. If split tunneling is correctly configured, the traffic for zoom.usshould be routedoutsidethe GlobalProtect VPN tunnel, while other traffic follows the tunnel path.
Reviewing the routing table ensures thatonly the intended traffic is excluded from the tunnel, confirming that the split tunnel configuration is working as expected.
質問 # 41
An engineer deploys a new branch connected to Prisma Access. From the customer premises equipment (CPE) device at the branch, Phase 1 on the tunnel is established, but Phase 2-encrypted packets are not coming back from Prisma Access.
Which Strata Logging Service log facility should the engineer review to determine why Phase 2-encrypted traffic is not being received?
- A. System logs
- B. Traffic logs
- C. Tunnel logs
- D. Decrypt logs
正解：C
解説：
SincePhase 1 of the IPSec tunnel is establishedbutPhase 2 traffic is not being received, theTunnel logsin Strata Logging Serviceshould be reviewed.Tunnel logsprovide visibility into IPSec tunnel establishment, Phase 2 negotiation, and any errors or dropped packets related to encrypted traffic. This will help identify whetherESP (Encapsulating Security Payload) traffic is being blocked, mismatched security associations (SAs) exist, or if there are other issues with Prisma Access responding to Phase 2-encrypted packets.
質問 # 42
What is the flow impact of updating the Cloud Services plugin on existing traffic flows in Prisma Access?
- A. They will be unaffected because the plugin upgrade is transparent to users.
- B. They will be unaffected only if Panorama is deployed in high availability (HA) mode.
- C. They will automatically terminate when the upgrade begins.
- D. They willexperience latency during the plugin upgrade process.
正解：A
解説：
Updating theCloud Services plugininPrisma Accessdoes not disrupt existing traffic flows because the upgrade process is designed to beseamless and transparent. Prisma Access ensures high availability by maintainingactive sessions and policieswhile applying the update in the background. This allows ongoing connections to continue without interruptions, minimizing impact on user experience.
質問 # 43
Which advanced AI-powered functionality does Strata Copilot provide to enhance the capabilities of Prisma Access security teams?
- A. Customized guidance for resolving issues through recommended next steps
- B. Automated remediation of misconfigured security policies
- C. Real-time traffic analysis for automated threat prevention
- D. Initial configuration of Prisma Access using a natural language interface
正解：A
解説：
Strata Copilotenhances the capabilities ofPrisma Access security teamsby providingAI-powered insights and recommendationsto help resolve security issues efficiently. It analyzessecurity events, misconfigurations, and alertsand offerscontextual guidancewithrecommended next stepsfor troubleshooting and improving security posture. This assists teams inquickly identifying and addressing security challengeswithout requiring deep manual investigation.
質問 # 44
A customer is implementing Prisma Access (Managed by Strata Cloud Manager) to connect mobile users, branch locations, and business-to- business (B2B) partners to their data centers.
The solution must meet these requirements:
The mobile users must have internet filtering, data center connectivity, and remote site connectivity to the branch locations.
The branch locations must have internet filtering and data center connectivity.
The B2B partner connections must only have access to specific data center internally developed applications running on non-standard ports.
The security team must have access to manage the mobile user and access to branch locations.
The network team must have access to manage only the partner access.
How should Prisma Access be implemented to meet the customer requirements?
- A. Deploy two Prisma Access instances - the first with mobile users, remote networks, and private access for all internal connection types, and the second with remote networks and private application access for B2B connections - and use the specific configuration scope for the connection type to manage access.
- B. Deploy two Prisma Access instances - the first with mobile users, remote networks, and private access for all internal connection types, and the second with remote networks and private application access for B2B connections - and use the Strata Multitenant Cloud Manager Prisma Access configuration scope to manage access.
- C. Deploy a Prisma Access instance with mobile users, remote networks, and private access for all connection types, and use the specific configuration scope for the connection type to manage access.
- D. Deploy a Prisma Access instance with mobile users, remote networks, and private access for all connection types, and use the Prisma Access Configuration scope to manage all access.
正解：A
解説：
To meet the customer's requirements, two separate Prisma Access instances should be deployed:
* Instance 1should includemobile users, remote networks, and private accessfor internal connectivity.
This ensures that mobile users can access the internet, data centers, and remote branch locations while enforcing security policies.
* Instance 2should be configured withremote networks and private application accessfor B2B connections. This instance will restrict access to only the required internally developed applications using non-standard ports, ensuring that partners cannot access other corporate resources.
By usingspecific configuration scopes for different connection types, the security team can manage access to mobile users and branch locations, while the network team can manage B2B partner connections. This ensuresproper segmentation of management responsibilitieswhile maintaining security and compliance.
質問 # 45
An administrator needs to enforce access to all applications via Prisma Access Browser (PAB) for unmanaged or non-compliant devices. Configuration of which two enforcement actions will ensure all access to applications only happens through PAB? (Choose two.)
- A. For SSO-enabled applications, configure Enforce SSO.
- B. Use Device Posture to allow or block traffic.
- C. Use Account Protection for non SSO-enabled applications.
- D. Use the PAB Extension to redirect traffic through Prisma Access.
正解：A、C
解説：
Forcing all application access through PAB for unmanaged or non-compliant devices requires addressing two distinct application authentication patterns separately, since a single enforcement mechanism cannot cover both. For applications that are integrated with the organization ' s identity provider and support SSO, the Enforce SSO setting ensures that any attempt to authenticate to that application is redirected specifically through the PAB-brokered session rather than allowing a direct, out-of-band login that would bypass PAB ' s controls entirely - this closes the most common bypass path for SSO-capable SaaS and web applications.
For applications that are not SSO-enabled and therefore cannot be gated the same way, Account Protection provides the complementary enforcement mechanism, restricting direct credential-based access to those applications outside of the PAB session so that even non-SSO applications cannot be reached through an unmanaged, unenforced path. Together, these two settings comprehensively cover both application authentication models, which is why options A and B form the correct pair. The PAB Extension (option C) is a deployment and traffic-redirection mechanism, but on its own it does not enforce that access only happens through PAB - a user could still, without SSO enforcement or Account Protection in place, log in to an application directly outside the extension ' s redirected session. Device Posture (option D) is used to assess and act on a device ' s compliance state to allow or block traffic generally; it is a conditional access input, not the specific enforcement mechanism that closes the SSO and non-SSO application bypass paths described in the question.
Reference:Prisma Access Browser - Enforce SSO and Account Protection for Application Access Control.
質問 # 46
Which policy configuration in Prisma Access Browser (PAB) will protect an organization from malicious BYOD and minimize the impact on the user experience?
- A. One that blocks file exchange
- B. One that allows access to applications with data masking or watermarking
- C. One for session recording
- D. One that blocks elements such as screen scrapers
正解：B
解説：
The scenario deliberately asks for a control that balances two competing goals: real protection against a compromised or malicious BYOD endpoint, and minimal disruption to the legitimate user ' s day-to-day workflow, which is exactly the trade-off data masking and watermarking are designed to solve. Rather than outright blocking access to sensitive applications on unmanaged devices - an approach that satisfies the security goal but badly damages usability and productivity - PAB can permit the user to continue working normally inside the isolated browser session while dynamically masking sensitive on-screen data fields or overlaying a visible or forensic watermark tied to the user ' s identity. This preserves functional access (protecting the user experience) while still substantially reducing the value of any data captured through screenshots, screen-sharing, or a compromised endpoint, and it deters and traces leakage even when it cannot be entirely prevented. This makes option D the best-fit answer for " protect while minimizing user-experience impact. " Blocking file exchange (option A) and blocking elements like screen scrapers (option C) are legitimate, harder-line data-loss-prevention controls, but they represent an access-restriction posture that directly works against the " minimize impact on the user experience " requirement stated in the question, since users lose functionality outright. Session recording (option B) is a monitoring and forensic capability, not a preventive protection against data exposure in the moment, and does not itself reduce risk to the organization the way masking or watermarking does.
Reference:Prisma Access Browser - Data Controls (Masking and Watermarking) for BYOD Use Cases.
質問 # 47
An engineer deploys a new branch connected to Prisma Access. From the customer premises equipment (CPE) device at the branch, Phase 1 on the tunnel is established, but Phase 2-encrypted packets are not coming back from Prisma Access. Which Strata Logging Service log facility should the engineer review to determine why Phase 2-encrypted traffic is not being received?
- A. Traffic logs
- B. Tunnel logs
- C. System logs
- D. Decrypt logs
正解：C
解説：
IKE and IPSec negotiation events - including successful and failed Phase 1 (IKE SA) and Phase 2 (IPSec SA) exchanges, proposal mismatches, and negotiation timeouts - are recorded by PAN-OS as System log entries, not as part of the Traffic, Tunnel, or Decrypt log facilities, which each capture a different category of information. Because Phase 1 has already completed successfully in this scenario but Phase 2 negotiation appears to be failing or stalling, the actual diagnostic detail explaining why - such as a proxy-ID/traffic- selector mismatch, an unsupported Phase 2 encryption or authentication algorithm, or a PFS group mismatch between the CPE and Prisma Access - will be recorded as a specific IKE/IPSec negotiation message in System logs, making option B the correct log facility to review. Decrypt logs (option A) capture SSL/TLS decryption events for inspected web traffic and have no relevance to IPSec tunnel negotiation, which is a separate control-plane process entirely. Traffic logs (option C) record session-level information for traffic that has already been successfully permitted through a completed policy match; since the tunnel ' s data plane is not yet fully established, there is no session traffic to log in the first place. Tunnel logs (option D) generally reflect the operational status and utilization of an already-established tunnel, not the underlying IKE/IPSec negotiation failure detail needed to diagnose why Phase 2 never completed.
Reference:PAN-OS/Strata Logging Service - System Logs for IKE Phase 1/Phase 2 Negotiation Troubleshooting.
質問 # 48
......
SSE-Engineer問題集レビュー専門クイズで学習材料：https://jp.fast2test.com/SSE-Engineer-premium-file.html