[2025年03月03日]CDIP試験問題集でリアル試験と100%同じ問題と解答
CDIPテストエンジン問題集トレーニングには140問あります
質問 # 81
A clinical documentation integrity (CDI) program that is compliant with regulations from the facility's payors results in
- A. need for more CDI staff
- B. meeting external benchmarks
- C. less risk from audits
- D. higher overall program cost
正解：C
質問 # 82
Which of the following is MOST likely to trigger a second-level review?
- A. A procedure code that increases reimbursement
- B. A record with multiple major complicating conditions (MCCs)
- C. An account coded before the discharge summary is available
- D. A diagnosis that impacts a quality-of-care measure
正解：B
解説：
Explanation
According to the AHIMA CDIP Exam Preparation Guide, a second-level review is a process that involves a review of coded records by a designated person or team to ensure the accuracy and completeness of coding and documentation1. A second-level review may be triggered by various factors, such as high-risk or high-dollar accounts, coding quality indicators, payer requirements, or internal audit findings1. One of the factors that is most likely to trigger a second-level review is a record with multiple major complicating conditions (MCCs)2. MCCs are diagnoses that significantly affect the severity of illness and resource utilization of a patient, and are assigned a higher relative weight in the DRG system3. A record with multiple MCCs may indicate a complex or unusual case that requires additional validation and verification of the coding and documentation. A record with multiple MCCs may also affect the reimbursement, risk adjustment, and quality scores of the hospital, and therefore may be subject to external scrutiny or audit4. The other options are not as likely to trigger a second-level review, as they are not as indicative of coding or documentation issues or risks. A procedure code that increases reimbursement may not necessarily require a second-level review, unless it is inconsistent with the documentation or the clinical indicators. A diagnosis that impacts a quality-of-care measure may be relevant for CDI purposes, but not necessarily for coding validation.
An account coded before the discharge summary is available may be incomplete or inaccurate, but it may also be corrected or updated before final billing.
CDIP Exam Preparation Guide - AHIMA
Building a Resilient CDI: Second Level Review
Major Complications or Comorbidities (MCC) & Complications or Comorbidities (CC) | CMS Demystifying and communicating case-mix index - ACDIS
質問 # 83
A patient falls off a ladder and undergoes a right femur procedure. Three weeks later, the patient returns to the hospital for removal of the external fixation device. The ICD-10-CM 7th character code value should indicate
- A. initial
- B. subsequent
- C. aftercare
- D. sequela
正解：C
解説：
Explanation
The ICD-10-CM 7th character code value should indicate aftercare for a patient who falls off a ladder and undergoes a right femur procedure, and then returns to the hospital for removal of the external fixation device.
Aftercare codes are used to capture encounters for follow-up care after completed treatment of an injury or condition, such as removal of external fixation devices, casts, or pins. Aftercare codes are not used for subsequent encounters for complications or infections related to the injury or condition5 References: 1:
https://www.ahima.org/media/owmhxbv1/cdip_contentoutline_2023_final.pdf 5:
https://my.ahima.org/store/product?id=67077
質問 # 84
A clinical documentation integrity practitioner (CDIP) in an acute care hospital was asked to create new query templates for ICD-10 based on AHIMA and ACDIS guidelines. What should the multiple-choice query format include?
- A. Clinically unsupported diagnosis
- B. Clinically insignificant options
- C. Impact on reimbursement
- D. Clinically significant options
正解：D
質問 # 85
Which of the following is an example of a hospital-acquired condition when not present on admission?
- A. Pressure ulcer stage II
- B. Pressure ulcer stage III
- C. Iatrogenic pneumothorax with venous catheterization
- D. Iatrogenic pneumothorax with lung biopsy
正解：B
解説：
Explanation
A hospital-acquired condition (HAC) is an undesirable situation or condition that affects a patient and that arose during a stay in a hospital or medical facility. CMS has identified 14 categories of HACs for which it will not pay the higher DRG rate if the condition was not present on admission (POA). One of these categories is stage III and IV pressure ulcers. A pressure ulcer is damage to the skin and underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure on the skin. Stage III pressure ulcers involve full-thickness skin loss with damage or necrosis of subcutaneous tissue that may extend down to, but not through, underlying fascia. The ulcer presents as a deep crater with or without undermining of adjacent tissue.
A: Iatrogenic pneumothorax with lung biopsy is not a HAC, because it is not included in the CMS HAC list.
Iatrogenic pneumothorax is a HAC only when it occurs with venous catheterization.
B: Iatrogenic pneumothorax with venous catheterization is a HAC, but it may be present on admission if the venous catheterization was performed before the admission to the hospital.
C: Pressure ulcer stage II is not a HAC, because only stage III and IV pressure ulcers are included in the CMS HAC list. Stage II pressure ulcers involve partial-thickness skin loss involving epidermis, dermis, or both. The ulcer is superficial and presents clinically as an abrasion, blister, or shallow crater.
References:
CDIP Exam Preparation Guide, 2021 Edition. AHIMA Press. ISBN: 9781584268530 Hospital Acquired Conditions | CMS ICD-10 HAC List | CMS Bedsores (pressure ulcers) - Symptoms and causes - Mayo Clinic
質問 # 86
Combination codes are used to classify two diagnoses, a diagnosis with a manifestation, or a diagnosis
- A. that is an integral part of a disease process
- B. with an associated procedure
- C. with a sequelae or late effect
- D. with an associated complication
正解：D
解説：
Explanation
Combination codes are used to classify two diagnoses, a diagnosis with a manifestation, or a diagnosis with an associated complication. A complication is a condition that arises during the hospital stay that prolongs the length of stay by at least one day in approximately 75 percent of cases1. Complications may affect payment and severity of illness and risk of mortality classifications. Examples of combination codes that include a diagnosis with an associated complication are:
I50.23 Acute on chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure
K57.21 Diverticulitis of large intestine with perforation and abscess with bleeding O34.211 Maternal care for incompetent cervix with cerclage, first trimester A diagnosis that is an integral part of a disease process is not a valid option for combination codes, because it does not represent a separate or additional condition that needs to be coded. For example, chest pain is an integral part of acute myocardial infarction and does not require a separate code.
A diagnosis with an associated procedure is not a valid option for combination codes, because procedures are coded separately from diagnoses using ICD-10-PCS codes. For example, appendicitis with appendectomy is not a combination code, but rather two codes: one for the diagnosis (K35.80 Acute appendicitis without perforation or gangrene) and one for the procedure (0DTJ4ZZ Resection of appendix, percutaneous endoscopic approach).
A diagnosis with a sequelae or late effect is not a valid option for combination codes, because sequelae or late effects are coded separately from the original condition using the appropriate code from category B90-B94 Sequelae of infectious and parasitic diseases or category I69 Sequelae of cerebrovascular disease, followed by the code for the specific condition2. For example, hemiplegia following cerebral infarction is not a combination code, but rather two codes: one for the sequelae (I69.351 Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side) and one for the original condition (I63.9 Cerebral infarction, unspecified).
References:
CDIP Exam Preparation Guide, 2021 Edition. AHIMA Press. ISBN: 9781584268530 ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2022 Identifying ICD-10 Combination Codes - Outsource Strategies International
質問 # 87
Which of the following clinical documentation integrity (CDI) dashboard metrics is frequently used to help evaluate the credibility of CDI practitioner queries and the success of the CDI program?
- A. CDI agreement rate
- B. CDI query rate
- C. Provider agreement rate
- D. Provider response rate
正解：C
解説：
Explanation
The provider agreement rate is the percentage of queries that result in a change in the documentation or coding that is consistent with the query. It is a measure of the accuracy and appropriateness of the queries, as well as the provider's acceptance of the CDI program's recommendations. A high provider agreement rate indicates that the CDI practitioners are asking relevant and compliant queries that improve the quality and specificity of the documentation. The other options are not directly related to the credibility of the queries or the success of the CDI program. The CDI agreement rate is the percentage of queries that agree with the coder's final DRG assignment. The CDI query rate is the percentage of records that generate a query from the CDI practitioner.
The provider response rate is the percentage of queries that receive a response from the provider.
質問 # 88
After one year, the clinical documentation integrity (CDI) program has become stagnant, and the manager plans to reinvigorate the program to better reflect the CDI efforts in the organization. What can the manager do to ensure program success?
- A. Establish a CDI steering committee to build a strong foundation
- B. Expand the CDI program to larger areas in outpatient clinics
- C. Identify key metrics to develop program measures for coders
- D. Prioritize to focus on efforts with the largest return on investment
正解：A
解説：
Explanation
A CDI steering committee is a group of interdisciplinary leaders who oversee and guide the CDI program's objectives, outcomes, and metrics. The committee should include representatives from finance, clinical, coding, quality, and other areas that are impacted by CDI. The committee should meet regularly to review the CDI program's performance, identify opportunities for improvement, and provide support and education to the CDI staff and providers. A CDI steering committee can help reinvigorate a stagnant CDI program by ensuring that it aligns with the organization's vision and mission, addresses the current challenges and needs, and fosters collaboration and communication among stakeholders. The other options are not necessarily effective ways to reinvigorate a CDI program. Expanding the CDI program to larger areas in outpatient clinics may not be feasible or appropriate without a clear strategy and plan. Prioritizing to focus on efforts with the largest return on investment may not reflect the true value and quality of the CDI program. Identifying key metrics to develop program measures for coders may not capture the full scope and impact of the CDI program.
質問 # 89
Automated registration entries that generate erroneous patient identification-possibly leading to patient safety and quality of care issues, enabling fraudulent activity involving patient identity theft, or providing unjustified care for profit-is an example of a potential breach of:
- A. Authorship integrity
- B. Patient identification and demographic accuracy
- C. Documentation integrity
- D. Auditing integrity
正解：B
解説：
Explanation
Patient identification and demographic accuracy is the process of ensuring that the patient's identity and personal information are correctly recorded and verified in the health record and other systems. A potential breach of this process could result in automated registration entries that generate erroneous patient identification, which could lead to patient safety and quality of care issues, enabling fraudulent activity involving patient identity theft, or providing unjustified care for profit2 Authorship integrity is the process of ensuring that the source and content of the health record are authentic, accurate, complete, and consistent. Documentation integrity is the process of ensuring that the health record reflects the patient's clinical status, treatment, and outcomes. Auditing integrity is the process of ensuring that the health record is reviewed and monitored for compliance, quality, and improvement purposes2
1: https://www.ahima.org/media/owmhxbv1/cdip_contentoutline_2023_final.pdf 2:
https://my.ahima.org/store/product?id=67077
質問 # 90
Which of the following is considered a hospital-acquired condition if not present on admission?
- A. Air leak
- B. Blood incompatibility
- C. Stage I and II pressure ulcers
- D. Diabetes with hypoglycemia
正解：B
解説：
Explanation
Blood incompatibility is considered a hospital-acquired condition if not present on admission, according to the CMS Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HAC) Reduction Program. This program reduces payments to hospitals that have high rates of certain conditions that are acquired during the hospital stay and could have been prevented by following evidence-based guidelines. Blood incompatibility is one of the 14 HAC categories that are included in the program, and it refers to a patient receiving a blood transfusion with incompatible blood type or Rh factor, which can cause serious adverse reactions such as hemolysis, anemia, renal failure, or death 23. Blood incompatibility is a preventable condition that can be avoided by proper blood typing and cross-matching before transfusion, and by following strict protocols and procedures for blood handling and administration 4.
References: 1: AHIMA CDIP Exam Prep, Fourth Edition, p. 133 5 2: Hospital-Acquired Conditions | CMS 1 3: Hospital Acquired Conditions (HACs) - New York State Department of Health 3 4: Transfusion Reactions - Hematology and Oncology - Merck Manuals Professional Edition 6
質問 # 91
A clinical documentation integrity practitioner (CDIP) has been successful in getting physicians to respond to queries. However, when the CDIP poses a query to a specific doctor, there is no response at all. The CDIP has tried face-to-face conversations, calling, emails, texts, but still gets no response. What is the next step the CDIP should take?
- A. Report the doctor to the Vice President of Medical Affairs so the doctor understands the importance of clinical documentation
- B. Hold a meeting with the CDI director and the doctor to find out why the doctor is not responding to the queries
- C. Elevate the issue to the physician advisor/champion after the CDI supervisor has reviewed the case and deemed the query appropriate
- D. Warn the other CDIPs that the doctor is a non-responder and to forego querying
正解：C
解説：
Explanation
According to the Guidelines for Achieving a Compliant Query Practice (2019 Update) - AHIMA1, a query escalation policy should describe how to handle situations in which an answer is not received, an inappropriate answer or comment is provided, etc. The escalation policy should address when the issue is brought to the physician advisor, the department director, or administration with defined actions as to the responsibilities at each level. The policies should reflect a method of response that can realistically occur for the organization1. In this case, since the CDIP has tried multiple methods of communication with the doctor but still gets no response, the CDIP should elevate the issue to the physician advisor/champion, who can facilitate communication and education with the doctor and ensure documentation integrity and compliance1. However, before escalating the issue, the CDIP should consult with the CDI supervisor to review the case and confirm that the query is appropriate, relevant, and compliant with the query guidelines1. This would ensure that the escalation is justified and not based on personal bias or preference.
The other options are not advisable because they either involve skipping the escalation policy, reporting the doctor without proper review or feedback, holding a meeting without involving the physician advisor/champion, or giving up on querying altogether.
References:
Guidelines for Achieving a Compliant Query Practice (2019 Update) - AHIMA1
質問 # 92
A hospital is conducting a documentation integrity project for the purpose of reducing indiscriminate use of electronic copy and paste of patient information in records by physicians. Which data should be used to quantify the extent of the problem?
- A. Results of a survey of physicians that asks about documentation practices
- B. Incidence of redundancies in physician notes in a sample of hospital admissions
- C. Percent of insurance billings denied due to lack of record documentation
- D. Number of coder queries regarding inconsistent physician record documentation
正解：B
解説：
Explanation
According to the AHIMA CDIP Exam Preparation Guide, a documentation integrity project is a systematic process of identifying, analyzing, and improving the quality and accuracy of clinical documentation in the health record1. A documentation integrity project may have various purposes, such as enhancing patient safety, improving coding and reimbursement, or complying with regulatory standards1. One of the common issues that may affect the quality and accuracy of clinical documentation is the indiscriminate use of electronic copy and paste of patient information in records by physicians2. Copy and paste is a function that allows physicians to duplicate existing text in the record and paste it in a new destination, which may save time and effort, but also may introduce errors, inconsistencies, or redundancies in the documentation2. Therefore, to quantify the extent of the problem of copy and paste, the data that should be used is the incidence of redundancies in physician notes in a sample of hospital admissions. Redundancies are repeated or unnecessary information that may clutter the record and impair its readability and reliability3. By measuring the frequency and types of redundancies in physician notes, the hospital can assess the impact of copy and paste on the documentation quality and identify areas for improvement. The other options are not correct because they do not directly measure the problem of copy and paste. The percent of insurance billings denied due to lack of record documentation may reflect other issues besides copy and paste, such as incomplete or inaccurate documentation, coding errors, or payer policies4. The number of coder queries regarding inconsistent physician record documentation may indicate the presence of copy and paste, but it may also depend on other factors such as coder knowledge, query guidelines, or query response rate. The results of a survey of physicians that asks about documentation practices may provide some insight into the perceptions and attitudes of physicians regarding copy and paste, but it may not reflect the actual extent or impact of the problem on the documentation quality.
CDIP Exam Preparation Guide - AHIMA
Auditing Copy and Paste - AHIMA
Copy/Paste: Prevalence, Problems, and Best Practices - AHIMA
Documentation Denials: How to Avoid Them - AAPC
[Q&A: Querying for clinical validation | ACDIS]
質問 # 93
A key physician approaches the director of the coding department about the new emphasis associated with clinical documentation integrity (CDI). The physician does not support the program and believes the initiative will encourage inappropriate billing.
How should the director respond to the concerns?
- A. Inform the physician that changes must be made
- B. Develop an administrative panel to oversee CDI process
- C. Involve the physician advisor/champion in addressing the medical staff's concerns
- D. Refer the physician to the finance department to discuss required billing changes
正解：C
解説：
Explanation
The director should involve the physician advisor/champion in addressing the medical staff's concerns because the physician advisor/champion is a key member of the CDI team who can provide clinical expertise, education, and leadership to promote CDI among physicians. The physician advisor/champion can help to explain the goals and benefits of CDI, such as improving patient care quality, accuracy of documentation, and appropriate reimbursement. The physician advisor/champion can also address any misconceptions or fears that the physicians may have about CDI, such as encouraging inappropriate billing or increasing their workload.
The physician advisor/champion can serve as a liaison between the CDI team and the medical staff, and foster a culture of collaboration and trust.
References:
CDIP Exam Content Outline (https://www.ahima.org/media/1z0x0x1a/cdip-exam-content-outline.pdf) CDIP Exam Preparation Guide (https://my.ahima.org/store/product?id=67077)
質問 # 94
For inpatients with a discharge principal diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, aspirin must be taken within
24 hours of arrival unless a contraindication to aspirin is
documented. How should this be documented in the health record?
- A. The name of the medication (aspirin), the date, time and location where it was last administered
- B. The name of the medication (aspirin), the date and location where it was last administered
- C. The name of the medication (aspirin), the date and time it was last administered
- D. The name of the medication (aspirin) and the date it was last administered
正解：A
解説：
Explanation
The name of the medication (aspirin), the date, time and location where it was last administered should be documented in the health record for inpatients with a discharge principal diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, unless a contraindication to aspirin is documented. This is because aspirin is a core measure for acute myocardial infarction patients, and its administration within 24 hours of arrival is an indicator of quality of care and patient safety. The date, time and location are important to verify that the medication was given within the specified timeframe and to avoid duplication or omission of doses4 References: 1:
https://www.ahima.org/media/owmhxbv1/cdip_contentoutline_2023_final.pdf 4:
https://my.ahima.org/store/product?id=67077
質問 # 95
A clinical documentation integrity practitioner (CDIP) is looking for clarity on whether a diagnosis has been
"ruled in" or "ruled out". Which type of query is the best option?
- A. None
- B. Multiple-choice
- C. Open-ended
- D. Yes/No
正解：C
解説：
Explanation
An open-ended query is a type of query that allows the provider to respond with free text, rather than choosing from a list of options or answering yes or no. An open-ended query is appropriate when the CDIP is looking for clarity on whether a diagnosis has been "ruled in" or "ruled out", because it allows the provider to document the final diagnosis or impression based on the clinical evidence and reasoning. An open-ended query also avoids leading or suggesting a specific diagnosis to the provider, which could compromise the integrity and validity of the documentation. (Guidelines for Achieving a Compliant Query Practice (2019 Update) - AHIMA1) References:
Guidelines for Achieving a Compliant Query Practice (2019 Update) - AHIMA1
質問 # 96
The clinical documentation integrity (CDI) manager is reviewing physician benchmarks and notices a low-severity level being measured against average length of stay.
What should the CDI manager keep in mind when discussing this observation with physicians?
- A. The indicator is a key factor of measurement for quality reports.
- B. The diagnosis with a higher degree of specificity has a lower severity of illness.
- C. The query rate is too high while the agreement rate is low.
- D. The query response rate directly correlates to quality reports.
正解：A
解説：
Explanation
According to the AHIMA CDIP Exam Preparation Guide, one of the CDI metrics and statistics that CDI managers should track and interpret is the severity level measured against average length of stay (ALOS)1. This indicator reflects the complexity and acuity of the patient population and the quality of care provided by the hospital2. A low-severity level with a high ALOS may indicate under-documentation or under-coding of the patient's condition, which may affect the hospital's reimbursement, risk adjustment, and quality scores3. Therefore, the CDI manager should keep in mind that this indicator is a key factor of measurement for quality reports when discussing this observation with physicians, and educate them on the importance of documenting and coding accurately and completely to reflect the patient's true severity of illness. The other options are not correct because they do not address the issue of severity level measured against ALOS, or they are not relevant to the CDI manager's role or responsibility. References:
CDIP Exam Preparation Guide - AHIMA
Demystifying and communicating case-mix index - ACDIS
Severity of Illness: What Is It? Why Is It Important? | HCPro
質問 # 97
Which member of the clinical documentation integrity (CDI) team can help provide peer-to-peer level of education on the importance of accurate documentation and query responses?
- A. Physician advisor/champion
- B. Chief Financial Officer
- C. CDI manager
- D. CDI practitioner
正解：A
解説：
Explanation
The member of the clinical documentation integrity (CDI) team who can help provide peer-to-peer level of education on the importance of accurate documentation and query responses is the physician advisor/champion. The physician advisor/champion is a physician who supports and advocates for the CDI program and its goals, and who can communicate effectively with other physicians about the clinical and financial implications of documentation quality and accuracy. The physician advisor/champion can also serve as a liaison between the CDI team and the medical staff, and help to resolve any issues or conflicts that may arise from the query process. The physician advisor/champion can also provide feedback and guidance to the CDI team on clinical matters and documentation standards. (CDIP Exam Preparation Guide) References:
CDIP Exam Content Outline1
CDIP Exam Preparation Guide2
質問 # 98
The ultimate purpose of clinical documentation integrity (CDI) expansion and growth is to
- A. show a direct relationship between clinical documentation and quality patient care
- B. provide community education to healthcare consumers
- C. promote CDI functions so that physicians view the CDI staff as value-added service
- D. create synergy between clinical education and CDI principles
正解：A
解説：
Explanation
The ultimate purpose of clinical documentation integrity (CDI) expansion and growth is to show a direct relationship between clinical documentation and quality patient care. According to the web search results, CDI programs aim to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical documentation by ensuring that it is accurate, complete, and consistent. This in turn leads to better health care data, which is vital for capturing the appropriate indicators used for health care facility and provider profiling, reimbursement, risk adjustment, and quality scores12. CDI programs also focus on patient safety, by identifying and resolving any documentation omissions, discrepancies, or adverse events that may affect the patient's outcome or care3. Therefore, CDI programs demonstrate how clinical documentation can impact the quality of patient care and the performance of health care organizations.
質問 # 99
The clinical documentation integrity (CDI) metrics recently showed a drastic drop in the physician query rate.
What might this indicate to the CDI manager?
- A. The loss of a large volume of patients has impacted workflow
- B. The program is successful because documentation has improved
- C. CDI staff need education on identifying query opportunities
- D. The decrease in hospital census has caused a lack of query opportunities
正解：C
解説：
Explanation
A drastic drop in the physician query rate might indicate to the CDI manager that the CDI staff need education on identifying query opportunities. The physician query rate is a metric that measures the percentage of records that have at least one query sent by the CDI staff to clarify or improve the documentation. A high query rate may reflect a high level of documentation quality issues or a high level of CDI staff vigilance and expertise. A low query rate may reflect a low level of documentation quality issues or a low level of CDI staff awareness and competence 2. Therefore, a drastic drop in the query rate could suggest that the CDI staff are missing some query opportunities or are not following the query policies and procedures. The CDI manager should investigate the reasons for the drop and provide education and feedback to the CDI staff on how to identify and address query opportunities effectively and compliantly 3.
References: 1: AHIMA CDIP Exam Prep, Fourth Edition, p. 133 4 2: Understanding CDI Metrics - AHIMA 2 3: The Natural History of CDI Programs: A Metric-Based Model 5
質問 # 100
What type of laboratory test is a creatinine test?
- A. Microbiology
- B. Chemistry
- C. Hematology
- D. Serology
正解：B
質問 # 101
What policies should query professionals follow?
- A. AHIMA's policies related to querying
- B. All healthcare entity's policies are the same
- C. CMS's policies related to querying
- D. Their healthcare entity's internal policies related to querying
正解：D
解説：
Explanation
Query professionals should follow their healthcare entity's internal policies related to querying, as they may vary depending on the organization's size, structure, scope, and goals. The internal policies should be based on industry best practices and standards, such as those provided by AHIMA and ACDIS, as well as applicable laws and regulations, such as those from CMS and OIG. However, AHIMA's and CMS's policies are not binding for all healthcare entities, and they may not address all the specific situations and challenges that query professionals may encounter. Therefore, query professionals should be familiar with their own healthcare entity's policies and procedures for querying, such as the query format, content, timing, delivery method, escalation process, retention, and audit. The other options are incorrect because they do not reflect the diversity and complexity of query policies across different healthcare entities.
質問 # 102
The clinical documentation integrity practitioner (CDIP) performed a verbal query and then later neglected following up with the provider. How should the CDIP avoid a compliance risk for this follow up failure according to AHIMA's Guidelines for Achieving a Compliant Query Practice?
- A. Complete the documentation at the time of discussion or immediately following
- B. Complete the documentation immediately after the provider's response
- C. Complete the documentation when there is a provider agreement
- D. Complete the documentation at the end of the day when entering cases reviewed
正解：A
解説：
Explanation
According to AHIMA's Guidelines for Achieving a Compliant Query Practice, the clinical documentation integrity practitioner (CDIP) should complete the documentation at the time of discussion or immediately following to avoid a compliance risk for this follow up failure. This is because verbal queries are considered part of the health record and must be documented in a timely and accurate manner to reflect the provider's response and any changes in documentation or coding. Completing the documentation later or only when there is an agreement may result in errors, omissions, inconsistencies, or delays that may affect the quality and integrity of the health record and the query process. (AHIMA Guidelines for Achieving a Compliant Query Practice1) References:
AHIMA Guidelines for Achieving a Compliant Query Practice1
質問 # 103
An organization dealing with staffing shortages has adopted a policy requiring clinical documentation integrity practitioner (CDIP) to stop reviewing any record after a major complication or co-morbidity is found. What is the unintended consequence of this?
- A. Reduced risk of clinical denials
- B. Increase in case mix index
- C. Decrease in severity of illness and risk of mortality
- D. Increased number of records reviewed by each CDIP
正解：C
解説：
Explanation
Severity of illness (SOI) and risk of mortality (ROM) are two metrics that measure the complexity and acuity of a patient's condition, based on the number, nature, and interaction of complications and comorbidities (CCs) and major CCs (MCCs). SOI reflects the extent of physiologic decompensation or organ system loss of function, while ROM reflects the likelihood of dying. Both SOI and ROM are divided into four levels: minor, moderate, major, or extreme. These metrics are used to adjust payment rates, quality indicators, and performance measures for hospitals and other healthcare providers.
If a CDIP stops reviewing any record after a major CC is found, they may miss other CCs or MCCs that could affect the patient's SOI and ROM levels. For example, a patient with pneumonia and sepsis would have a major CC (pneumonia) and an MCC (sepsis). If the CDIP stops reviewing the record after finding pneumonia, they would not capture sepsis, which would increase the patient's SOI and ROM levels from major to extreme.
This would result in underreporting the patient's true complexity and acuity, and potentially lead to lower reimbursement, lower quality scores, and higher denial risk.
Therefore, the unintended consequence of this policy is a decrease in SOI and ROM levels for patients who have more than one CC or MCC.
References:
CDIP Exam Preparation Guide, 2021 Edition. AHIMA Press. ISBN: 9781584268530 Q&A: Understanding SOI and ROM in the APR-DRG system
3M™ All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR DRGs)
Severity of illness | definition of severity of illness by Medical dictionary Using Severity Adjustment Classification for Hospital Internal and External Comparisons
質問 # 104
A hospital noticed a 30% denial rate in Medicare claims due to lack of clinical documentation, placing the hospital at risk of multiple Medicare violations. What step should the clinical documentation integrity (CDI) manager take to help avoid future Medicare violations?
Collaborate with physician advisor/champion and revenue cycle manager
Instruct the billing department to write off claims with insufficient documentation
- A. Assign pre-billing claim review duties to physicians
- B. Prevent submission of claims for improper documentation
正解：A
解説：
Explanation
The step that the clinical documentation integrity (CDI) manager should take to help avoid future Medicare violations is to collaborate with physician advisor/champion and revenue cycle manager. The physician advisor/champion can help with educating and engaging the physicians on the importance and impact of clinical documentation on coding, reimbursement, quality measures, compliance, and patient care. The revenue cycle manager can help with analyzing and monitoring the denial trends and patterns, identifying and resolving the root causes of denials, implementing corrective actions and preventive measures, and ensuring timely and accurate claim submission and appeal processes. References: :
https://www.ahima.org/media/owmhxbv1/cdip_contentoutline_2023_final.pdf :
https://my.ahima.org/store/product?id=67077
質問 # 105
Which of the following individuals is the first line of escalation for an unanswered query?
- A. CDI Steering Committee
- B. HIM/Coding Manager
- C. CDI Manager
- D. Medical Director
正解：C
解説：
Explanation
The first line of escalation for an unanswered query is the CDI Manager because they are responsible for overseeing the CDI program and ensuring compliance with query policies and procedures. The CDI Manager can monitor the query response rates, identify the providers who are not responding, and communicate with them to address any issues or barriers. The CDI Manager can also provide education and feedback to the providers on the importance and benefits of timely query responses. If the CDI Manager is unable to resolve the problem, then they can escalate it to the next level, such as the Medical Director or the CDI Steering Committee. (CDIP Exam Preparation Guide) References:
CDIP Exam Content Outline1
CDIP Exam Preparation Guide2
Q&A: Establishing an escalation policy for inappropriate queries3
質問 # 106
......
CDIP練習テストPDF試験材料：https://jp.fast2test.com/CDIP-premium-file.html