VMA試験問題集を使って一日でValue Methodology試験合格目指す（最新の63解答) [Q19-Q40]

VMA試験問題集を使って一日でValue Methodology試験合格目指す（最新の63解答)

VMA試験正確な問題集、学習ノートと理論

質問 # 19
In which phase does one work to obtain a thorough understanding of the subject of the VM study?

• A. Creativity Phase
• B. Information Phase
• C. Evaluation Phase
• D. Presentation Phase

正解：B

解説：
The Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan, as outlined in the VMF 1 course and SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, consists of six phases, starting with the Information Phase. According to VMF 1 Core Competency #3 (Value Methodology Job Plan), the Information Phase is where the VM team works to
"obtain a thorough understanding of the subject of the study by gathering and analyzing data on project scope, costs, constraints, objectives, and stakeholder needs." This phase involves collecting all relevant information-such as drawings, specifications, cost data, and performance requirements-to establish a baseline for the study, ensuring the team fully understands the project before proceeding to function analysis.
* Option A (Information Phase) is correct, as it is explicitly defined as the phase for gaining a thorough understanding of the VM study's subject.
* Option B (Creativity Phase) is incorrect because this phase focuses on generating ideas, not gathering information.
* Option C (Evaluation Phase) is incorrect because this phase involves assessing ideas, which occurs after the subject is already understood.
* Option D (Presentation Phase) is incorrect because this phase involves communicating recommendations, not studying the subject.
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, detailing the Information Phase in the VM Job Plan.
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #3 (Value Methodology Job Plan), emphasizing the role of the Information Phase in understanding the study subject.

質問 # 20
Which of the following techniques involves capturing input from multiple customers and stakeholders at the same time?

• A. Questionnaires
• B. Interviews
• C. Surveys
• D. Focus panels

正解：D

解説：
In Value Methodology (VM), gathering input from customers and stakeholders is a key activity, particularly during the Information Phase of the VM Job Plan, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #3:
Value Methodology Job Plan). According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, various techniques are used to collect stakeholder input, including interviews, questionnaires, surveys, and focus panels. The standard defines these as follows:
* Interviews: One-on-one discussions with individual stakeholders to gather detailed insights.
* Questionnaires: Written sets of questions distributed to stakeholders, typically completed individually.
* Surveys: Similar to questionnaires, often distributed to a larger group, with responses collected individually.
* Focus panels: Group discussions involving multiple customers and stakeholders simultaneously, designed to capture collective input and foster dialogue.
The question specifies a technique that involves capturing input "at the same time" from multiple customers and stakeholders, which aligns with the definition offocus panels. Focus panels (or focus groups) bring together diverse stakeholders in a single session to discuss needs, preferences, and concerns, allowing for real- time interaction and consensus-building, which is particularly useful in VM studies to understand project objectives and constraints.
* Option A (Interviews) is incorrect because interviews are typically conducted one-on-one, not with multiple stakeholders simultaneously.
* Option B (Questionnaires) is incorrect because questionnaires are completed individually, not in a group setting at the same time.
* Option C (Surveys) is incorrect because surveys are also completed individually, often asynchronously, not at the same time.
* Option D (Focus panels) is correct, as it involves capturing input from multiple stakeholders simultaneously in a group setting.
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, detailing stakeholder engagement techniques in the Information Phase.
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #3 (Value Methodology Job Plan), emphasizing methods like focus panels for gathering collective stakeholder input.

質問 # 21
In which costing technique is the time value of money essential?

• A. Life Cycle Cost
• B. Simple Payback
• C. Return on Investment
• D. Break-even point

正解：A

解説：
Cost analysis in Value Methodology often involves financial techniques to evaluate the economic feasibility of alternatives, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #4: Cost Analysis). According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, "the time value of money is essential in costing techniques that account for costs and benefits over time, such as Life Cycle Cost (LCC)."Life Cycle Costis defined as "the total cost of a system or product over its entire life, including acquisition, operation, maintenance, and disposal, discounted to present value using the time value of money." The time value of money ensures that future costs and benefits are adjusted to their present value using a discount rate (as noted in Questions 6 and
7), making LCC a comprehensive method for comparing alternatives in VM studies.
* Option A (Return on Investment) is incorrect because, while ROI can consider the time value of money in some calculations, it is not essential; ROI is often calculated as a simple percentage (Profit ÷ Investment).
* Option B (Life Cycle Cost) is correct, as LCC inherently requires the time value of money to discount future costs to present value, ensuring a fair comparison over the project's life.
* Option C (Simple Payback) is incorrect because simple payback (as calculated in Question 26) does not account for the time value of money; it simply divides the initial investment by annual savings.
* Option D (Break-even point) is incorrect because the break-even point (similar to payback) typically does not incorporate the time value of money; it focuses on the point where costs equal revenues.
:
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #4 (Cost Analysis), which includes Life Cycle Cost as a technique requiring the time value of money.
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard," section on cost analysis, defining Life Cycle Cost and its reliance on discounting (consistent with Question 7 on Present Worth).

質問 # 22
The best study results will usually come from applying the value methodology with:

• A. A multidisciplinary team with a selected set of skills
• B. A team working in similar disciplines
• C. An executive-level task force
• D. The current project team

正解：A

解説：
Value Methodology (VM) relies heavily on effective team dynamics to achieve optimal results, as emphasized in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #5: Value Team Dynamics). According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, "the best VM study results are typically achieved with a multidisciplinary team with a selected set of skills, bringing diverse perspectives and expertise to analyze functions, generate ideas, and develop solutions." A multidisciplinary team includes members from different disciplines (e.g., engineering, finance, design, operations) relevant to the project, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the system and fostering innovative solutions through varied viewpoints. The VMF 1 course highlights that such teams are more effective at identifying value improvement opportunities because they combine technical, financial, and operational insights.
* Option A (An executive-level task force) is incorrect because executives may lack the technical expertise needed for detailed function analysis and idea generation, though they may sponsor the study.
* Option B (A team working in similar disciplines) is incorrect because a lack of diversity in perspectives can limit creativity and overlook key opportunities, which a multidisciplinary team avoids.
* Option C (The current project team) is incorrect because the project team may be too close to the problem, potentially leading to bias and a narrower focus, whereas a multidisciplinary team brings fresh perspectives.
* Option D (A multidisciplinary team with a selected set of skills) is correct, as it aligns with VM best practices for achieving the best study results.
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary teams in VM studies.
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #5 (Value Team Dynamics), highlighting the effectiveness of diverse, skilled teams in VM.

質問 # 23
Identify which are key data used to transform information for a product value study:

• A. Customer demographics, overhead cost, drawings, competitive analysis, sample components, labor reports
• B. Flow diagrams, latest cost estimate, labor reports, drawings, site plan, regulatory requirements
• C. Design objectives, original cost estimate, drawings, specifications, resource models, customer demographics
• D. Customer requirements, overhead cost, competitive analysis, sample components, packaging requirements, warranty information

正解：C

解説：
The Information Phase of the Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan involves gathering and transforming data to understand the subject of the study, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #3: Value Methodology Job Plan). According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, "key data for a product value study typically includes design objectives, cost estimates, drawings, specifications, and resource models, which are transformed to define functions, costs, and constraints." These data types are essential for a product- focused study (as opposed to a process or construction project), enabling the VM team to:
* Understand the product's purpose (design objectives).
* Analyze costs (original cost estimate, before optimization).
* Review technical details (drawings, specifications).
* Assess resource use (resource models).Customer demographics may provide context but are not core to transforming information for a product value study.
* Option A (Flow diagrams, latest cost estimate, labor reports, drawings, site plan, regulatory requirements): This is more suited for a process or construction project (e.g., flow diagrams, site plan), not a product value study.
* Option B (Customer requirements, overhead cost, competitive analysis, sample components, packaging requirements, warranty information): While customer requirements and sample components are relevant, competitive analysis, packaging, and warranty are secondary; overhead cost is too specific and not a core data type for transformation.
* Option C (Design objectives, original cost estimate, drawings, specifications, resource models, customer demographics): This is correct, as it includes the core data types for a product value study (design objectives, cost estimate, drawings, specifications, resource models), though customer demographics are less critical but acceptable as context.
* Option D (Customer demographics, overhead cost, drawings, competitive analysis, sample components, labor reports): This includes less relevant data (customer demographics, competitive analysis, labor reports) and misses key items like design objectives and specifications.
* Option C (Design objectives, original cost estimate, drawings, specifications, resource models, customer demographics) is correct, as it best aligns with the key data needed for a product value study.
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, detailing data types for the Information Phase in product value studies.
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #3 (Value Methodology Job Plan), emphasizing key data for transforming information (consistent with Question 39).

質問 # 24
A Random Function Identification table contains:

• A. Elements, functions, and classifications
• B. Costs, time, and risks
• C. Components, resources, and criteria
• D. Inputs, objectives, and sequence

正解：A

解説：
Random Function Identification is a technique used in Value Methodology's Function Analysis phase to identify and organize functions before creating a Function Analysis System Technique (FAST) diagram, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #2). According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, Random Function Identification involves "listing all functions of a system or project in a table, typically including the elements (components or parts), their associated functions (in verb-noun format), and their classifications (e.g., basic, secondary, higher-order)." This table helps the VM team systematically identify and categorize functions during the early stages of analysis, ensuring all functions are captured before structuring them in a FAST diagram.
* Option A (Inputs, objectives, and sequence) is incorrect because inputs and objectives are part of the Information Phase, and sequence is addressed in FAST diagramming, not in the Random Function Identification table.
* Option B (Costs, time, and risks) is incorrect because these are related to cost analysis or implementation planning, not function identification.
* Option C (Elements, functions, and classifications) is correct, as it aligns with the purpose of the Random Function Identification table in VM.
* Option D (Components, resources, and criteria) is incorrect because resources and criteria are not part of function identification; criteria are used in the Evaluation Phase.
:
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #2 (Function Analysis), which includes Random Function Identification as a precursor to FAST diagramming.
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard," section on Function Analysis, describing the Random Function Identification table as listing elements, functions, and classifications.

質問 # 25
What is the objective of the Creativity Phase?

• A. Generate improvement ideas
• B. Select improvement ideas
• C. Develop improvement ideas
• D. Prioritize improvement ideas

正解：A

解説：
The Creativity Phase (also known as the Creative Phase) is the third phase of the Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #6: Creative Thinking and Idea Generation).
According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, "the objective of the Creativity Phase is to generate a large quantity of improvement ideas through brainstorming and other creative techniques, focusing on alternative ways to perform the functions identified in the Function Analysis Phase." This phase emphasizes divergent thinking to produce as many ideas as possible without judgment, as supported by the ground rules discussed in Question 10 (e.g., encouraging openness, freewheeling, and recording ideas). The generated ideas are then evaluated in the next phase (Evaluation Phase).
* Option A (Develop improvement ideas) is incorrect because development occurs in the Development Phase, where selected ideas are refined into actionable proposals, not in the Creativity Phase.
* Option B (Select improvement ideas) is incorrect because selection occurs in the Evaluation Phase, not Creativity.
* Option C (Prioritize improvement ideas) is incorrect because prioritization also occurs in the Evaluation Phase (as noted in Question 33 with the coarse-medium-fine filters).
* Option D (Generate improvement ideas) is correct, as it matches the primary objective of the Creativity Phase in the VM Job Plan.
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, detailing the Creativity Phase's objective to generate ideas.
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #6 (Creative Thinking and Idea Generation), emphasizing idea generation as the goal of the Creativity Phase.

質問 # 26
What is the correct sequence of the last four phases of the Value Methodology Job Plan?

• A. Development, Evaluation, Presentation, and Implementation
• B. Development, Presentation, Evaluation, and Implementation
• C. Evaluation, Development, Presentation, and Implementation
• D. Evaluation, Development, Implementation, and Presentation

正解：C

解説：
The Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan, as outlined in the VMF 1 course and SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, consists of six phases: Information, Function Analysis, Creative, Evaluation, Development, and Presentation. This was established in Question 1, where the VM Job Plan was confirmed to have six phases. The last four phases, therefore, are: Creative, Evaluation, Development, and Presentation.
However, the options include "Implementation," which is not a formal phase in the standard VM Job Plan but is often considered a post-study activity (e.g., in the post-study phase, where recommendations are implemented). For the purposes of the VMA exam, which focuses on the VMF 1 curriculum, Implementation is sometimes treated as an extension of the Presentation Phase, where the team ensures stakeholder buy-in and facilitates the transition to implementation.
Thus, the correct sequence of the last four phases, interpreting Implementation as the post-Presentation activity, is:
* Creative(third phase, but the first of the last four).
* Evaluation(fourth phase): Assess ideas for feasibility and value improvement.
* Development(fifth phase): Refine selected ideas into actionable proposals.
* Presentation(sixth phase): Present recommendations to stakeholders for approval and implementation.
* Implementation: Follows Presentation as a post-study activity to execute the recommendations.
* Option A (Development, Presentation, Evaluation, and Implementation) is incorrect because Evaluation must precede Development-ideas are evaluated before being developed into proposals.
* Option B (Evaluation, Development, Presentation, and Implementation) is correct, as it follows the VM Job Plan's sequence and includes Implementation as the post-study step.
* Option C (Evaluation, Development, Implementation, and Presentation) is incorrect because Presentation (delivering recommendations) must occur before Implementation.
* Option D (Development, Evaluation, Presentation, and Implementation) is incorrect because Development cannot precede Evaluation in the VM Job Plan.
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, detailing the six phases of the VM Job Plan.
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #3 (Value Methodology Job Plan), outlining the sequence of phases, with Implementation as a post-study activity.

質問 # 27
If an organization invests $160,000 in a new software system that improves analysis and reduces annual costs by $3,000 per year, the payback period would be approximately:

• A. 50 years
• B. 53 years
• C. 45 years
• D. 56 years

正解：B

解説：
In Value Methodology, cost analysis often involves financial metrics like the payback period to evaluate the economic feasibility of alternatives, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #4: Cost Analysis).
According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, the payback period is "the time required for the cumulative savings or benefits from an investment to equal the initial cost, calculated as Initial Investment ÷ Annual Savings." Here, the organization invests $160,000 in a software system that saves
$3,000 per year.
* Payback Period = Initial Investment ÷ Annual Savings
* Payback Period = $160,000 ÷ $3,000 = 53.333 years
* Rounding to the nearest whole number, the payback period is approximately 53 years.
The question does not specify adjustments for the time value of money (e.g., discounting), which aligns with the simple payback method commonly used in VM for straightforward analysis.
* Option A (45 years) is incorrect because 160,000 ÷ 3,000 = 53.333, not 45.
* Option B (50 years) is incorrect because it underestimates the payback period (53.333 years).
* Option C (53 years) is correct, as it matches the calculated payback period when rounded.
* Option D (56 years) is incorrect because it overestimates the payback period.
:
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #4 (Cost Analysis), which includes calculating payback periods for economic evaluation in VM studies.
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard," section on cost analysis, referencing the simple payback method for assessing alternatives.

質問 # 28
Which of the following best describes a VM study?

• A. Is considered a business improvement best practice
• B. Must be led by a Certified Value Specialist
• C. Is undertaken after the design is completed
• D. It is a structured effort using the VM process to improve value

正解：D

解説：
A Value Methodology (VM) study is a structured effort that applies the VM process to improve the value of a project, product, or process by optimizing the function-to-cost ratio. According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, a VM study is defined as "a systematic application of recognized techniques by a multi-disciplined team to identify the functions of a project or process, establish a worth for each function, and develop alternatives to achieve those functions at the lowest overall cost while maintaining performance." The VMF 1 course emphasizes that a VM study follows the six-phase VM Job Plan (Information, Function Analysis, Creative, Evaluation, Development, and Presentation) to systematically improve value, making it a structured effort.
* Option A (structured effort using the VM process) directly aligns with SAVE International's definition of a VM study, focusing on the systematic application of the VM process to enhance value.
* Option B (must be led by a Certified Value Specialist) is incorrect because, while a Certified Value Specialist (CVS) often leads VM studies, the VMF 1 course and VMA certification allow non-CVS team members to participate in and contribute to VM studies under guidance, meaning it's not a requirement.
* Option C (undertaken after the design is completed) is incorrect because VM studies can be conducted at various stages of a project lifecycle-concept, design, or implementation-not only after the design is completed. The VMF 1 course highlights that early application of VM yields the greatest benefits.
* Option D (business improvement best practice) is a broader statement and not specific to the definition of a VM study, though VM can contribute to business improvements. It does not best describe a VM study compared to Option A.
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, defining a VM study as a structured process to improve value.
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Associate (VMA) Certification,"https://www.value-eng.org/page
/VMA, referencing VMF 1 Core Competency #1 (Value Methodology Overview).

質問 # 29
"When" is represented by which of the following letters?

• A. B
• B. A
• C. C
• D. D

正解：B

解説：
The diagram provided is a Function Analysis System Technique (FAST) diagram, a key tool in Value Methodology's Function Analysis phase, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #2). FAST diagrams map the relationships between functions of a system, with specific directions indicating the logic of the functions:
* The horizontal axis represents the "how-why" logic (critical path), where moving left answers "why" and moving right answers "how."
* The vertical axis represents the "when" direction, indicating functions that occur simultaneously or continuously while the critical path functions are performed (e.g., all-the-time functions, as noted in Question 27).
According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, "in a FAST diagram, the 'when' direction is shown by vertical relationships, indicating functions that are concurrent or supporting the critical path." In the diagram:
* The critical path (horizontal, marked by Y in Question 3) runs from E to F to G to J to L to M to N to O.
* Scope lines are labeled B (left) and D (right), as identified in Question 30.
* Vertical arrows (e.g., Z in Question 3, pointing to J-K) indicate the "when" direction, showing functions that occur simultaneously with the critical path functions.
* Ais a horizontal line at the bottom of the diagram, but in FAST diagramming, the vertical axis (and its bounding lines) is associated with the "when" direction. The options (A, B, C, D) include A as the bottom horizontal line, which, in some FAST diagram interpretations, can be seen as marking the boundary of the "when" direction (vertical relationships).
* C(noted in Question 30) is an arrow pointing left, representing the "why" direction, not "when." Given the options,Ais the closest representation of the "when" direction, as it aligns with the vertical axis's boundary, which defines the space where "when" relationships (simultaneous functions) are shown. In standard FAST diagramming, the "when" direction is vertical, and A, as the bottom horizontal line, frames the vertical space where these relationships are depicted (e.g., S, T, U, K).
* Option A (A) is correct, as it represents the boundary of the vertical axis, which is associated with the
"when" direction in FAST diagrams.
* Option B (B) is incorrect because B is a scope line (left vertical), which defines the study's boundary, not the "when" direction.
* Option C (C) is incorrect because C is an arrow indicating the "why" direction (left), not "when."
* Option D (D) is incorrect because D is the right scope line, not related to the "when" direction.
:
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #2 (Function Analysis), defining the "when" direction in FAST diagrams as vertical, indicating simultaneous functions.
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard," section on Function Analysis, describing FAST diagramming conventions, including the "when" direction as vertical relationships.

質問 # 30
Which of the following is the risk response strategy for opportunities that seek to increase the probability of an opportunity occurring and/or the magnitude of results being beneficial?

• A. Mitigate
• B. Share
• C. Enhance
• D. Exploit

正解：C

解説：
Risk management in Value Methodology (VM) includes strategies for both threats and opportunities, particularly during the Implementation Planning phase, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #8:
Implementation Planning). According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, which aligns with project management best practices (e.g., PMI's PMBOK, as noted in Question 28), risk response strategies for opportunities include:
* Exploit: Ensure the opportunity is realized by taking actions to make it certain (e.g., assigning the best resources).
* Share: Partner with others to increase the likelihood or benefit of the opportunity (e.g., joint ventures).
* Enhance: Increase the probability of the opportunity occurring and/or the magnitude of its beneficial results (e.g., by improving conditions or amplifying benefits).
* Accept: Take no action to influence the opportunity.
The question specifically asks for the strategy that seeks to "increase the probability of an opportunity occurring and/or the magnitude of results being beneficial," which directly matches the definition ofEnhance.
For example, in a VM study, enhancing an opportunity might involve marketing a new feature to increase its adoption rate (probability) or improving its design to maximize savings (magnitude).
* Option A (Exploit) is incorrect because exploiting ensures the opportunity happens, not necessarily increasing its probability or magnitude.
* Option B (Share) is incorrect because sharing involves collaboration, not directly increasing probability or magnitude.
* Option C (Mitigate) is incorrect because mitigation applies to threats, not opportunities.
* Option D (Enhance) is correct, as it focuses on increasing the probability and/or magnitude of an opportunity's benefits.
:
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #8 (Implementation Planning), detailing risk response strategies for opportunities, including Enhance.
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard," section on risk management, referencing strategies like Enhance for opportunities (consistent with Question 28).

質問 # 31
In which phase is a large quantity of ideas or alternatives generated to accomplish the functions?

• A. Function Analysis Phase
• B. Creativity Phase
• C. Evaluation Phase
• D. Presentation Phase

正解：B

解説：
The Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan consists of six phases, as outlined in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #3: Value Methodology Job Plan). The phase dedicated to generating a large quantity of ideas or alternatives is the Creativity Phase (also known as the Creative Phase). According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, "the Creativity Phase is where a large quantity of ideas or alternatives is generated to accomplish the functions identified in the Function Analysis Phase, using techniques like brainstorming to encourage divergent thinking." This phase focuses on producing as many ideas as possible without judgment, as established in Question 40, where the objective of the Creativity Phase was confirmed as generating improvement ideas.
* Option A (Creativity Phase) is correct, as it is the phase dedicated to generating a large quantity of ideas to accomplish functions.
* Option B (Presentation Phase) is incorrect because this phase involves presenting recommendations to stakeholders, not generating ideas.
* Option C (Evaluation Phase) is incorrect because this phase involves assessing and selecting ideas, not generating them (as noted in Question 33).
* Option D (Function Analysis Phase) is incorrect because this phase focuses on identifying and analyzing functions, not generating ideas (as noted in Question 37).
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, detailing the Creativity Phase's role in idea generation.
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #6 (Creative Thinking and Idea Generation), emphasizing the generation of a large quantity of ideas (consistent with Question 40).

質問 # 32
The Value Methodology is:

• A. A cost reduction exercise to improve value.
• B. A suggestion program to improve value.
• C. An eight-phase process to improve value.
• D. A step-by-step design review to improve value.

正解：D

解説：
Value Methodology (VM), as defined by SAVE International in the Value Methodology Fundamentals 1 (VMF 1) course, is a systematic, step-by-step approach to improve the value of a project, product, or process by optimizing the function-to-cost ratio. According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, VM is described as "a systematic and structured approach for improving projects, products, and processes...
to achieve the optimum balance between function, performance, quality, safety, and cost." The VM Job Plan, a core component of VM, involves a step-by-step process (six phases: Information, Function Analysis, Creative, Evaluation, Development, and Presentation) that can be likened to a design review because it evaluates and enhances the design or process to improve value.
* Option A (suggestion program) is incorrect because VM is not merely about collecting suggestions; it is a structured methodology with defined phases and tools like function analysis.
* Option B (cost reduction exercise) is incorrect because VM focuses on improving value, not just reducing costs-cost reduction may occur, but only if it does not compromise essential functions.
* Option C (step-by-step design review) aligns with VM's systematic nature, as the Job Plan reviews and improves designs or processes through structured phases, making it the best fit.
* Option D (eight-phase process) is incorrect because the VM Job Plan has six phases, not eight, as established in SAVE International's standards.

質問 # 33
The original VM Job Plan was based on a problem-solving approach. Which is the correct order of the four steps comprising this approach?

• A. Observation, Hypothesis, Experimentation, Conclusion
• B. Hypothesis, Observation, Experimentation, Conclusion
• C. Hypothesis, Experimentation, Observation, Conclusion
• D. Observation, Experimentation, Hypothesis, Conclusion

正解：A

解説：
The original Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan, developed by Lawrence D. Miles in the 1940s, was rooted in a problem-solving approach inspired by the scientific method. As outlined in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #1: Value Methodology Overview), Miles adapted a systematic problem-solving framework to create the VM Job Plan, which later evolved into the six-phase process used today (Information, Function Analysis, Creative, Evaluation, Development, Presentation). The original problem-solving approach, as described in SAVE International's historical documentation of VM, follows the scientific method's four steps:
Observation, Hypothesis, Experimentation, and Conclusion.
* Observation: Observe the problem or system (e.g., high costs, inefficiencies) to understand the current state, aligning with the Information Phase.
* Hypothesis: Form a hypothesis about how to improve value (e.g., identifying key functions or alternatives), similar to Function Analysis and Creative Phases.
* Experimentation: Test the hypothesis by developing and evaluating alternatives, akin to the Evaluation and Development Phases.
* Conclusion: Draw conclusions and implement solutions, corresponding to the Presentation Phase.
This order-Observation, Hypothesis, Experimentation, Conclusion-is the standard sequence of the scientific method, which Miles used as the foundation for VM's systematic approach to problem-solving.
* Option A (Hypothesis, Observation, Experimentation, Conclusion) is incorrect because observation must come first to identify the problem.
* Option B (Observation, Experimentation, Hypothesis, Conclusion) is incorrect because hypothesizing should precede experimentation.
* Option C (Hypothesis, Experimentation, Observation, Conclusion) is incorrect because observation must come before forming a hypothesis.
* Option D (Observation, Hypothesis, Experimentation, Conclusion) is correct, as it matches the scientific method's order, which underpins the original VM Job Plan.
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, historical section on the origins of VM and its problem-solving roots.
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #1 (Value Methodology Overview), detailing the history of the VM Job Plan and its basis in the scientific method.

質問 # 34
In which phases of the VM Job Plan does the VM study team use convergent thinking?

• A. Information, Function Analysis, Creativity
• B. Evaluation, Development, Presentation
• C. Function Analysis, Creativity, Evaluation
• D. Creativity, Evaluation, Development

正解：B

解説：
The Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan leverages both divergent and convergent thinking, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #3: Value Methodology Job Plan). According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, "convergent thinking is used to narrow down and refine ideas, focusing on analysis, selection, and implementation, while divergent thinking generates a wide range of ideas." The VM Job Plan's six phases are: Information, Function Analysis, Creativity, Evaluation, Development, and Presentation. Convergent thinking is applied in:
* Evaluation Phase: The team narrows down ideas using filters (Coarse, Medium, Fine, as in Question
33) and evaluation matrices, selecting the best ones.
* Development Phase: The team refines selected ideas into actionable proposals, focusing on feasibility and cost.
* Presentation Phase: The team consolidates proposals into a final recommendation, ensuring clarity and alignment with stakeholder needs.
Divergent thinking is primarily used in the Creativity Phase, while Information and Function Analysis involve analytical thinking but not necessarily convergent thinking in the same sense (they focus on understanding and defining, not narrowing down).
* Option A (Creativity, Evaluation, Development) is incorrect because Creativity uses divergent thinking, not convergent.
* Option B (Information, Function Analysis, Creativity) is incorrect because none of these phases primarily use convergent thinking; Creativity is divergent.
* Option C (Evaluation, Development, Presentation) is correct, as these phases involve convergent thinking to narrow down, refine, and finalize ideas.
* Option D (Function Analysis, Creativity, Evaluation) is incorrect because Function Analysis and Creativity do not primarily use convergent thinking.
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, detailing the use of convergent thinking in Evaluation, Development, and Presentation.
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #3 (Value Methodology Job Plan), emphasizing thinking types across phases (consistent with Question 22).

質問 # 35
Which of the following is most relevant to the Evaluation Phase?

• A. Constraints
• B. Weighting
• C. Return on Investment
• D. Cost Model

正解：B

解説：
The Evaluation Phase of the Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan, as outlined in the VMF 1 course and SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, involves assessing ideas generated during the Creative Phase to select the most viable ones for further development. According to VMF 1 Core Competency #7 (Evaluation and Selection of Alternatives), the Evaluation Phase focuses on "evaluating ideas based on criteria such as cost, performance, feasibility, and alignment with project goals, often using tools like weighted evaluation matrices."Weightingrefers to assigning weights to evaluation criteria (e.g., cost savings, quality, risk) to prioritize ideas systematically, making it the most relevant to this phase.
* Option A (Return on Investment) is incorrect because ROI is a financial metric typically calculated during the Development Phase when modeling the cost and benefits of selected ideas, not during Evaluation.
* Option B (Cost Model) is incorrect because cost models are developed in the Development Phase to detail the financial impact of selected ideas, though rough cost estimates may be considered in Evaluation.
* Option C (Weighting) is correct, as weighting criteria in tools like a weighted evaluation matrix is a key activity in the Evaluation Phase to rank and select ideas.
* Option D (Constraints) is incorrect because identifying constraints occurs primarily in the Information Phase, though they may be considered during Evaluation as part of feasibility analysis.
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, detailing the Evaluation Phase and the use of weighted evaluation matrices.
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #7 (Evaluation and Selection of Alternatives), emphasizing weighting criteria for idea selection.

質問 # 36
Ground rules that support creative brainstorming include:

• A. Focusing on quality ideas, discussing their merits, and maintaining momentum.
• B. Encouraging openness to ideas, freewheeling, and recording good ideas.
• C. Requesting idea clarification, discussing cost impacts, and considering performance.
• D. Focusing on prioritized functions, deferring judgment, and improving ideas.

正解：B

解説：
Creative Thinking and Idea Generation is a key focus of the Creative Phase in the Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #6). SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard outlines that the Creative Phase involves "generating a large quantity of ideas through brainstorming, encouraging creativity without judgment." The ground rules for effective brainstorming, as per VMF 1, include: encouraging openness to all ideas (no criticism), promoting freewheeling (wild ideas are welcome), and recording good ideas to ensure they are captured for later evaluation. These rules are designed to maximize idea quantity and foster a creative environment.
* Option A (Encouraging openness to ideas, freewheeling, and recording good ideas) is correct, as it directly aligns with VMF 1's brainstorming ground rules for the Creative Phase.
* Option B (Focusing on prioritized functions, deferring judgment, and improving ideas) is partially correct-deferring judgment is a rule, but focusing on prioritized functions and improving ideas occurs in the Evaluation Phase, not during brainstorming.
* Option C (Focusing on quality ideas, discussing their merits, and maintaining momentum) is incorrect because focusing on quality and discussing merits involves judgment, which is discouraged during brainstorming.
* Option D (Requesting idea clarification, discussing cost impacts, and considering performance) is incorrect because these actions involve evaluation and analysis, which occur in the Evaluation Phase, not during Creative brainstorming.
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, section on the Creative Phase, outlining brainstorming ground rules.
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #6 (Creative Thinking and Idea Generation), emphasizing openness, freewheeling, and recording ideas during brainstorming.

質問 # 37
When transforming subject scope information, it is most important that the VM study team have a clear understanding of:

• A. the Pareto chart, risk data, and quality expectations.
• B. the interests and influence of customers, users, and stakeholders.
• C. value improvement ideas and performance attributes.
• D. the subject's purpose and the objectives of the VM study.

正解：D

解説：
Transforming subject scope information occurs during the Information Phase of the Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #3: Value Methodology Job Plan).
According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, "when transforming subject scope information, the VM study team must have a clear understanding of the subject's purpose (what it does and why it exists) and the objectives of the VM study (e.g., reduce costs by 15%, improve performance)." This understanding ensures that the team aligns the study with the project's goals and the VM process's aims, setting the foundation for effective function analysis and value improvement. This aligns with the primary objective of the Information Phase-to understand the subject-and the focus of the kickoff meeting on outlining goals and objectives. While stakeholder interests and other data are important, the most critical understanding is of the subject's purpose and study objectives.
* Option A (value improvement ideas and performance attributes) is incorrect because value improvement ideas are developed later (Creativity Phase, Question 49), and performance attributes are a subset of the broader purpose.
* Option B (the subject's purpose and the objectives of the VM study) is correct, as it captures the most important understanding needed during the Information Phase.
* Option C (the Pareto chart, risk data, and quality expectations) is incorrect because these are specific tools or data points, not the most critical understanding; Pareto charts apply later.
* Option D (the interests and influence of customers, users, and stakeholders) is incorrect because, while important, this is a subset of understanding the subject's purpose and study objectives, which are more fundamental.
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, emphasizing the need to understand the subject's purpose and study objectives in the Information Phase.
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #3 (Value Methodology Job Plan), highlighting the focus on purpose and objectives (consistent with Questions 39 and 50).

質問 # 38
All-the-time functions are:

• A. Outside the study scope
• B. A drain on resources
• C. Continuous
• D. Undesirable

正解：C

解説：
In Value Methodology's Function Analysis, functions are classified based on their characteristics, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #2: Function Analysis). According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, "all-the-time functions are those that occur continuously or are always active during the operation of the system." In a FAST diagram, all-the-time functions are often shown vertically (e.g.,
"when" direction) alongside the critical path, indicating they are ongoing while the main functions are performed. For example, in a car, "provide safety" (e.g., through seatbelts) is an all-the-time function because it is always active when the car is in use. This aligns with the FAST diagramming convention of showing simultaneous functions.
* Option A (Outside the study scope) is incorrect because all-the-time functions are within the scope if they are part of the system's operation, though they may be supporting functions.
* Option B (A drain on resources) is incorrect because all-the-time functions are not necessarily resource- intensive; they are simply continuous.
* Option C (Continuous) is correct, as it matches the definition of all-the-time functions in VM.
* Option D (Undesirable) is incorrect because all-the-time functions are not inherently undesirable; they may be essential (e.g., "provide safety").
:
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #2 (Function Analysis), defining all-the-time functions as continuous in FAST diagramming.
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard," section on Function Analysis, describing all-the-time functions as those that occur continuously during system operation.

質問 # 39
During the life cycle of a project or product, the greatest possibility to influence impacts and costs takes place during:

• A. Organizing
• B. Maintaining
• C. Operating
• D. Planning

正解：D

解説：
Value Methodology emphasizes applying VM early in a project or product lifecycle to maximize its impact on costs and outcomes, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #1: Value Methodology Overview).
According to SAVE International's Value Methodology Standard, "the greatest opportunity to influence a project's impacts and costs occurs during the planning phase, when decisions about design, scope, and requirements are made." Early intervention allows the VM team to optimize functions and reduce costs before they are locked in by detailed design or implementation. This principle is often illustrated by the "cost influence curve," which shows that the ability to influence costs decreases as the project progresses, while the cost to make changes increases.
* Option A (Operating) is incorrect because, during operation, most costs are already incurred, and changes are costly and limited in impact.
* Option B (Planning) is correct, as it is the phase where VM can most effectively influence design and cost decisions, per VM standards.
* Option C (Organizing) is incorrect because organizing is a management function, not a distinct lifecycle phase for applying VM.
* Option D (Maintaining) is incorrect because maintenance occurs late in the lifecycle, when cost influence is minimal.
:
SAVE International, "Value Methodology Standard and Body of Knowledge," available athttps://www.value- eng.org, emphasizing early application of VM in the planning phase.
SAVE International, VMF 1 Core Competency #1 (Value Methodology Overview), highlighting the cost influence curve and the importance of early VM intervention.

質問 # 40
......

VMA問題集PDFで最速合格希望VMA：https://jp.fast2test.com/VMA-premium-file.html

100% 高得点合格保証VMA無制限63解答：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1SVHyDXJ7jfDYQxqJ64RUuySBqjEdMvOn