GRI ESRS-Professional認定ガイドPDFは100%カバー率でリアル試験問題 [Q17-Q33]

GRI ESRS-Professional認定ガイドPDFは100%カバー率でリアル試験問題

合格させるESRS-Professional試験にはリアル問題解答

質問 # 17
Indicate whether the following statement is true or false.
External assurance not required for all information reported under ESRS 2 and the topical ESRS.

• A. False
• B. True

正解：B

解説：
UnderESRS 2 and topical ESRS,external assurance is not required for all information reported. Instead, assurance requirements depend onspecific regulatory obligations and the phase-in periods set by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
* Limited Assurance Requirement Initially
* CSRDmandates limited assuranceover sustainability information at first, withreasonable assurance (more stringent) to follow in later years.
* However,not all data points require assurance-only those specifically outlined in the European Commission's assurance framework.
* Mandatory Assurance for Some Disclosures
* ESRS 2 covers general disclosures, but only certainmetrics and targets under specific topical ESRS require external assurance.
* Appendix C of ESRS 2 outlines which disclosures require assurance.
* Entity-Specific Exemptions & Phase-in Rules
* Some disclosuresdo not require assurance if they are deemed immaterialbased on the materiality assessment.
* SMEs and first-time reportershavephased-in assurance requirements.
Thus,external assurance is not required for all ESRS 2 and topical ESRS disclosures, making the statementTrue.
* Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772
* Compilation Explanations January - November 2024
Official References:

質問 # 18
Which activities are part of Step A: Understanding the Context in the double materiality assessment process?
Select all options that apply.

• A. Analyzing the legal and regulatory landscape
• B. Engaging with affected stakeholders to gather input
• C. Mapping the organization's value chain
• D. Developing a list of material risks and opportunities

正解：A、B、C

解説：
Thedouble materiality assessment processconsists of multiple steps, withStep A: Understanding the Contextfocusing on setting the groundwork for identifying material impacts, risks, and opportunities (IROs).
Step A includes:
* Mapping the organization's value chain (Option A)
* This step involves identifying all elements of the organization's value chain, including suppliers, distributors, and business partners, to understand where sustainability impacts occur.
* It helps in pinpointing potential sustainability matters, risks, and opportunities related to both impact and financial materiality.
* Engaging with affected stakeholders to gather input (Option B)
* Stakeholder engagement is a critical part of the materiality assessment as it informs the organization about direct and indirect sustainability impacts.
* The ESRS guidance stresses that businesses must engage with affected stakeholders (e.g., employees, communities, consumers) and sustainability experts as part of the due diligence process.
* Analyzing the legal and regulatory landscape (Option C)
* Organizations must review applicable laws, regulatory frameworks, and international sustainability commitments that may affect their sustainability reporting obligations.
* This ensures compliance withEU regulations (CSRD, ESRS, Taxonomy Regulation, SFDR) and other relevant legal requirements.
* D. Developing a list of material risks and opportunities
* This step belongs toStep B: Identifying Material Sustainability Matters, where the organization formally identifies and assesses material IROs. Step A is only about gathering contextual information to inform this process.
* Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, Section 3.3- Double materiality and materiality assessment process.
* EFRAG IG 1: Materiality Assessment, Chapter 2.2- Understanding the context and engagement with affected stakeholders.
* EFRAG Compilation of Explanations January-November 2024- Provides clarifications on stakeholder engagement and legal context review in Step A.
Incorrect Answer:Official References:

質問 # 19
Why should organizations consider reporting on sustainability? Select all options that apply.

• A. Reporting guarantees immediate financial gains for the organization.
• B. Demonstrating sustainability performance can enhance brand value and provide a competitive advantage.
• C. Stakeholders increasingly expect organizations to report on their sustainability performance.
• D. Reporting demonstrates transparency and accountability by disclosing environmental, social, and economic impacts.

正解：B、C、D

解説：
Organizations should report on sustainability for several reasons, includingtransparency, stakeholder expectations, and competitive advantage. Below is the evaluation of each option:
* A. True- Reporting on sustainabilitydemonstrates transparency and accountability, allowing companies to disclose theirenvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) impacts.
* B. True-Stakeholders, including investors, customers, and regulators,increasingly demand sustainability reportingto assess the long-term viability of a company.
* C. False- While sustainability reporting may contribute tolong-term financial gains, it doesnot guarantee immediate financial benefits.
* D. True- Companies withstrong sustainability performanceoften enjoyenhanced brand value and competitive advantage, attracting investors and customers who prefer sustainable businesses.
Why Sustainability Reporting MattersBenefit
Impact on Organization
Transparency & Accountability
Builds trust with investors, regulators, and the public
Stakeholder Expectations
Meets regulatory and customer expectations for ESG disclosures
Brand & Competitive Advantage
Companies with strong ESG performance are more attractive to investors
Regulatory Compliance
Helps meet CSRD and ESRS disclosure obligations
* CSRD & ESRS Guidance (2024)- Key Sustainability Reporting Benefits.
* EU Platform on Sustainable Finance Report (2025)- Stakeholder Expectations & Competitive Advantage.
Official References:

質問 # 20
Which internal department is primarily responsible for providing information on building energy use and the environmental performance of physical infrastructure?

• A. Facilities Management
• B. Legal and Compliance
• C. R&D and Product Development
• D. Operations

正解：A

解説：
TheFacilities Management (FM) departmentis primarily responsible for providing information on building energy use and the environmental performance of physical infrastructure.
Key responsibilities include:
* Energy management: Tracking energy consumption and implementing efficiency measures.
* Sustainability initiatives: Managing green building certifications, renewable energy installations, and environmental compliance.
* Infrastructure monitoring: Overseeing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, lighting efficiency, and water usage.
While theOperationsdepartment may use energy-related data for broader business functions, Facilities Management specializes inmonitoring and improving building performancefrom an environmental perspective.
* ESRS E1 - Climate Change, Disclosure Requirement E1-5- Specifies requirements for energy consumption and environmental impacts of buildings.
* EFRAG Guidance on Environmental Performance and Building Energy Use- Confirms that FM is responsible for infrastructure sustainability monitoring.
Official References:

質問 # 21
Which of the following is true about setting thresholds for financial materiality under the ESRS?

• A. Reputational risks cannot be considered financially material.
• B. Thresholds should focus exclusively on the short-term time horizon.
• C. Financial materiality thresholds are based on the likelihood of occurrence and the potential magnitude of financial effects.
• D. Organizations should only use monetary thresholds, such as revenue or costs.

正解：C

解説：
Under the ESRS framework, financial materiality is assessed based on a combination of:
* Likelihood of occurrence- The probability that a sustainability matter will have a financial impact.
* Potential magnitude of financial effects- The scale of the impact on financial position, performance, cash flows, access to finance, or cost of capital over short-, medium-, or long-term periods.
This is outlined in ESRS 1, which states that a sustainability matter isfinancially materialif it could reasonably be expected totrigger material financial effectson an undertaking. Financial materiality is not limited to issues under the direct control of the company; it includesdependencies on natural, human, and social resourcesthat could create risks or opportunities.
* Option A:The ESRS framework allows for bothqualitative and quantitative thresholds, not just monetary ones (e.g., revenue or costs).
* Option C:Reputational risks can be financially material, as they may affect access to finance, cost of capital, or customer trust, ultimately influencing the company's financial performance.
* Option D:Thefinancial materiality assessmentis conducted for theshort-, medium-, and long-term, not just the short term.
Why the other options are incorrect:References:
* Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772
* Compilation Explanations January - July 2024, ESRS 1 on Financial Materiality
* EFRAG Guidance on Double Materiality and Risk Assessments

質問 # 22
Indicate whether the following statement is true or false.
All EU Member States decided that only statutory financial auditors are allowed to conduct the assurance of the sustainability statement, excluding other audit firms or Independent Assurance Service Providers.

• A. False
• B. True

正解：A

解説：
Not all EU Member States have decided that only statutory financial auditors are allowed to conduct the assurance of the sustainability statement. TheCorporate Sustainability ReportingDirective (CSRD) mandates that sustainability reports beassuredby an external party, but it allows Member States to decide whether assurance engagements can be performed by firms other than statutory financial auditors.
* Limited Assurance Requirement:
* TheCSRD introduces a phased approachtoassurance, starting withlimited assuranceand transitioning toreasonable assuranceover time (expected by 2028).
* Initially,limited assuranceis required across all Member States.
* Flexibility for Member States:
* EU Member Stateshave discretionto allowother independent assurance service providersto conduct the sustainability assurance, in addition to statutory auditors.
* Some countries mayrestrictsustainability assurance to statutory auditors, butthis is not an EU- wide rule.
* Upcoming EU Assurance Standards:
* TheEuropean Commissionis working on developing acommon EU assurance standardfor sustainability reporting.
* TheCommittee of European Auditing Oversight Bodies (CEAOB)has issued non-binding guidelinesonlimited assurancefor sustainability reporting.
Key Provisions:Thus,the statement is falsebecausenot all EU Member States have restricted sustainability assurance to statutory financial auditors. Some allowother independent assurance providersto conduct the engagements.
Official References:
* CSRD (Directive (EU) 2022/2464) Assurance Provisions.
* EU Platform on Sustainable Finance Report (February 2025) - Assurance Standards and Guidelines.
* CEAOB Guidelines on Limited Assurance for Sustainability Reporting (September 2024).

質問 # 23
Which of the following can organizations use to identify actual and potential IROs during Step B of the double materiality assessment process? Select all options that apply.

• A. The list of sustainability matters in ESRS 1 AR 16
• B. Feedback from stakeholders
• C. Financial materiality thresholds
• D. Due diligence processes

正解：A、B、D

解説：
DuringStep Bof thedouble materiality assessment process, organizations mustidentify actual and potential impacts, risks, and opportunities (IROs). The ESRS framework recommends the following methods:
* A. The list of sustainability matters in ESRS 1 AR 16#
* ESRS 1 Application Requirement (AR) 16provides acomprehensive reference listof sustainability matters to consider when identifying IROs.
* This list includesenvironmental, social, and governance topicsaligned withEU sustainability objectives.
* C. Due diligence processes#
* ESRS requires organizations touse due diligence processesto identifynegative sustainability impacts.
* Due diligence aligns with frameworks such as theOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprisesand theUN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
* This ensures that potentialrisks and opportunitiesare assessed based oninternational sustainability standards.
* D. Feedback from stakeholders#
* Stakeholders, includingemployees, suppliers, customers, and affected communities, provide crucial insightsinto sustainability impacts.
* ESRSmandates engagement with affected stakeholdersas part of theIRO identification process.
* Financial materiality thresholds apply later in the process (Step C)when evaluating thefinancial impact of sustainability matters.
* Step Bfocuses only on identifying IROs, makingfinancial thresholds irrelevant at this stage.
Why is B. Financial materiality thresholds#incorrect?Conclusion:Organizations should usethe ESRS 1 AR 16 sustainability matters list, due diligence processes, and stakeholder feedbacktoidentify IROsin Step B of the double materiality assessment.Financial materiality thresholds do not apply in this step.
Official Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, various EFRAG guidance documents, and CSRD-related references:
* Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, ESRS 1, AR 16:List of Sustainability Matters for Identifying IROs.
* EFRAG Compilation of Explanations (January - July 2024): Confirmation thatdue diligence and stakeholder inputare part ofIRO identification.

質問 # 24
Indicate whether the following statement is true or false.
In the ESRS, impact materiality is considered the starting point for the double materiality assessment because material impacts may trigger financial risks and opportunities in the future.

• A. False
• B. True

正解：B

解説：
Impact materiality is indeed considered thestarting pointfor thedouble materiality assessmentin the ESRS.
The reason is that material impacts on sustainability matters cangenerate financial risks and opportunitiesin the future. TheESRS frameworkfollows this structure because:
* Interrelation Between Impact and Financial Materiality
* Double materiality includestwo dimensions:a)Impact materiality(how the company affects people and the environment).b)Financial materiality(how sustainability matters affect the company's financial performance).
* Impact materiality assessments oftenprecedefinancial materiality because many sustainability issues initially manifest asexternal environmental and social impactsbefore affecting the company'sfinancial results.
* Regulatory Confirmation of Impact as the Starting Point
* According toESRS 1, section 3.3, impact materiality is typically assessedfirst, unless afinancial risk or opportunity exists independentlyof an impact.
* A sustainability mattermay become financially materialover time due to regulatory changes, evolving market expectations, or direct financial consequences.
* Illustration of the Double Materiality Process
* Example: A company engaged inhigh carbon emissionsmight initially consider this animpact materiality issue(environmental harm). However,increased carbon pricing, regulatory changes, and shifting investor preferencescan latertransform this into a financial materiality issue.
Conclusion:Sinceimpact materiality serves as a precursorto financial materiality in most cases, the statement istrue.
Official Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, various EFRAG guidance documents, and CSRD-related references:
* Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, ESRS 1, Section 3.3:Double Materiality Framework.
* EFRAG Compilation of Explanations (January - July 2024): Confirmation that impact materiality assessment is the typicalentry point.

質問 # 25
Select all the correct steps for conducting a double materiality assessment based on the ESRS.

• A. SBM-3 outlines disclosure requirements on the material impacts, risks, and opportunities resulting from the materiality assessment.
• B. Compare the identified material topics with the list in ESRS 1 Application Requirement 16.
• C. Entity-specific disclosures must be developed only for impacts covered by ESRS.
• D. Double materiality assessments are not required for organizations following the ESRS.
• E. Only financial materiality should be considered when conducting the assessment.
• F. ESRS 2 requires the use of IRO-1 to report on the organization's process for identifying impacts, risks, and opportunities.

正解：A、B、F

解説：
Thedouble materiality assessmentinvolves identifying sustainability matters that are material either from:
* An impact perspective(the organization's effects on people and the environment).
* A financial perspective(how sustainability matters affect the organization financially).
Thecorrect stepsin conducting this assessment include:
* (A) Comparing identified material topics with ESRS 1 AR 16- This ensures alignment with predefined sustainability mattersin ESRS.
* (C) Using ESRS 2 IRO-1- This disclosure requirement mandates companies toreport on their methodology for identifying impacts, risks, and opportunities.
* (D) Following SBM-3 of ESRS 2- This section provides requirements fordisclosing the material impacts, risks, and opportunities identified through the materiality assessment.
* (B) False:Entity-specific disclosures must coverall material sustainability topics, even those not explicitly covered in ESRS.
* (E) False:Both financial and impact materiality must be considered(double materiality), not just financial materiality.
* (F) False:Double materiality assessments are mandatoryfor all organizations reporting under ESRS.
* Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, Section 3.3 on Double Materiality
* EFRAG Compilation on Double Materiality Assessments, providing step-by-step guidance on ESRS compliance Why the other options are incorrect:References:==============

質問 # 26
Which department is primarily responsible for providing employee-related data such as headcount, turnover, and health and safety statistics?

• A. Marketing
• B. Health and Safety
• C. Compliance
• D. Human Resources

正解：D

質問 # 27
What disclosures must be included in the sustainability statement? Select all that apply.

• A. Environmental objectives under the EU Taxonomy Regulation
• B. General Disclosure Requirements from ESRS 2
• C. Financial performance metrics from IFRS reports
• D. Governance-related information determined by the materiality assessment

正解：A、B、D

解説：
Thesustainability statementunder ESRS is structured according toESRS 1 and ESRS 2, outlining specific disclosure requirements. The required disclosures include:
* General Disclosure Requirements from ESRS 2
* ESRS 2 outlinesgeneral disclosure requirements, including governance, strategy, and impact, risk, and opportunity management (IROs). These disclosures are mandatory for all undertakings, providing the foundation of the sustainability statement.
* #(A) is correct
* Environmental Objectives under the EU Taxonomy Regulation
* Companies must disclose theiralignment with the EU Taxonomy Regulation, particularly under Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, which includes financial and non-financial companies' obligations regarding taxonomy-aligned activities.
* #(B) is correct
* Financial Performance Metrics from IFRS Reports
* Financial metrics from IFRS are NOT a required disclosure under ESRS. The sustainability statement focuses on non-financial reporting, whilefinancial performance remains under IFRS standards in financial statements.
* #(C) is incorrect
* Governance-Related Information Determined by the Materiality Assessment
* Governance disclosures (ESRS G1 Business Conduct)include transparency about policies, risk management, and ethical business practices. Themateriality assessment determines the necessary governance disclosuresbased on entity-specific risks and opportunities.
* #(D) is correct
Conclusion:Thesustainability statement must include general disclosure requirements (A), environmental objectives under the EU Taxonomy (B), and governance-related information based on materiality (D). Financial performance metrics from IFRS reports (C) are not required.
* Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772
* Compilation Explanations January - July 2024
Official References:

質問 # 28
Which of the following statements best captures the shift introduced by the CSRD compared to the NFRD?

• A. The CSRD eliminates the need for sustainability reporting assurance entirely, simplifying compliance for organizations.
• B. The CSRD introduces mandatory assurance for ESRS reporting, with defined requirements for scope, standards, and providers.
• C. The CSRD maintains the NFRD's voluntary approach to assurance, allowing organizations to select their own providers and define the assurance scope.

正解：B

解説：
TheCorporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)significantly strengthens sustainability reporting and assurance requirements compared to theNon-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). The key shift introduced by CSRD is themandatory assurance of sustainability reports, which includesdefined standards, scope, and providers.
Key Differences Between CSRD and NFRD:Feature
NFRD (Previous Directive)
CSRD (New Directive)
Assurance Requirement
Voluntary
Mandatory
Who Can Provide Assurance?
Organizations could choose any provider
Member States decide between statutory auditors and independent assurance providers Assurance Scope Limited guidance Defined ESRS-based scope Assurance Level No formal requirement Limited assurance initially, transitioning to reasonable assurance by 2028 Reporting Scope Limited to large public-interest entities Expanded to all large companies and listed SMEs Disclosure Framework High-level requirements Detailed ESRS framework with sector-specific standards
* Mandatory Assurance:
* Unlike the NFRD, the CSRDrequires sustainability reports to be assuredby an independent external provider.
* The assurance process followsESRS standardsto ensure consistency.
* Defined Standards and Scope:
* CSRD specifies thescope of assurance, focusing onmaterial sustainability disclosures, governance, andrisk disclosures.
* TheEuropean Commissionis developing a standard methodology for assurance.
* Transition to Reasonable Assurance:
* Initially,limited assuranceis required.
* ByOctober 2028, the EU aims to transition toreasonable assurance, aligning sustainability assurance with financial audits.
* Option A: Incorrect - TheCSRD makes assurance mandatory, whereas theNFRD had a voluntary approach.
* Option B: Incorrect - TheCSRD does not eliminate sustainability reporting assurance; it makes it morestructured and rigorous.
Key Provisions of the CSRD:Why Other Answers Are Incorrect:Thus, thecorrect answer is C:The CSRD introduces mandatory assurance for ESRS reporting, with defined requirements for scope, standards, and providers.
Official References:
* CSRD Directive (EU) 2022/2464- Assurance Provisions.
* EU Platform on Sustainable Finance Report (February 2025)- Assurance and Compliance Guidelines.
* CEAOB Guidelines on Assurance of Sustainability Reporting (2024)- Limited Assurance Transitioning to Reasonable Assurance.

質問 # 29
Which of the following correctly fills the gaps in the paragraph below?
The first set of the ESRS consist of several standards: The first group includes __________ General requirements and __________ General disclosures. These standards apply regardless of the specific sustainability topic being reported.
The next group includes ten __________ that cover various topics across the three dimensions of sustainable development. For example, ESRS E1 focuses on the environmental dimension, particularly climate change.
Finally, the last group includes the __________ which are currently under development.

• A. ESRS 2; ESRS 1; topical standards; sector-specific standards
• B. topical standards; ESRS 2; ESRS 1; sector-specific standards
• C. ESRS 1; ESRS 2; topical standards; sector-specific standards
• D. ESRS 2; topical standards; sector-specific standards; ESRS 1

正解：C

解説：
The ESRS (European Sustainability Reporting Standards) framework consists of three primary categories of standards:
* ESRS 1 (General Requirements):
* ESRS 1 sets out thefundamental principlesand requirements for sustainability reporting.
* It provides an overview of the structure and drafting conventions of the ESRS framework, defining the categories of ESRS standards: cross-cutting, topical, and sector-specific.
* It also establishes thedouble materiality principleas the basis for sustainability disclosures.
* ESRS 2 (General Disclosures):
* ESRS 2 outlines thecore disclosure requirementsapplicable to all sustainability topics, ensuring comparability and completeness.
* It includes general governance, strategy, impact, risk, and opportunity management disclosures applicable to all sustainability topics.
* These disclosure requirements apply to all undertakingsregardless of the specific sustainability topics being reported.
* Topical Standards:
* The ESRS framework includes tentopical standardscovering the three key dimensions of sustainability:
* Environmental (E): ESRS E1 (Climate Change), ESRS E2 (Pollution), ESRS E3 (Water & Marine Resources), ESRS E4 (Biodiversity & Ecosystems), and ESRS E5 (Resource Use
& Circular Economy).
* Social (S): ESRS S1 (Own Workforce), ESRS S2 (Workers in the Value Chain), ESRS S3 (Affected Communities), and ESRS S4 (Consumers & End-users).
* Governance (G): ESRS G1 (Business Conduct).
* These standards providespecific requirementson sustainability matters, complementing the general disclosure requirements in ESRS 2.
* Sector-Specific Standards:
* Sector-specific ESRS arecurrently under development.
* These will address sustainability mattersspecific to different industries, ensuring that sectoral nuances are properly considered.
* They aim tofill gaps not sufficiently coveredby the topical standards by defining industry- specific impacts, risks, and opportunities.
* ESRS 1 (General Requirements) comes first, setting the foundation.
* ESRS 2 (General Disclosures) follows, providing cross-cutting disclosure requirements.
* Topical standards are next, covering specific sustainability topics.
* Sector-specific standards are the final category, though they are still in development.
Why is C. ESRS 1; ESRS 2; topical standards; sector-specific standards the correct answer?Thus, the correct order aligns with theofficial structureof the ESRS framework as mandated inCommission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772.
Official Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, various EFRAG guidance documents, and CSRD-related references:
* Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, Annex I: Structure of the ESRS framework.
* EFRAG Compilation of Explanations (January - November 2024): Explanation of ESRS categories.
* EFRAG Mapping of Sustainability Matters to Topical Disclosures (Q&A ID 177): Confirmation of ESRS 1, ESRS 2, and the ten topical standards.

質問 # 30
Which of the following statements about the CSRD reporting mandate are correct? Select all that apply.

• A. The organizations reporting under the CSRD need to follow a specific reporting format.
• B. The CSRD is tied to other EU legislation which companies subject to the CSRD may need to comply with.
• C. The CSRD mandate does not require external assurance for sustainability reporting.
• D. The organizations reporting under the CSRD do not need to report value chain information.
• E. The CSRD only applies to companies headquartered in the EU.
• F. The CSRD requires a double materiality assessment to be conducted for sustainability reporting.

正解：A、B、F

解説：
TheCorporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)includes specificreporting mandatesthat organizations must comply with. Below is an evaluation of each option:
* A. True- The CSRD requires organizations to conduct adouble materiality assessment, considering bothfinancial materiality(impact on the company's financial position) andimpact materiality(the company's impact on the environment and society).
* B. True- Organizations reporting under the CSRD mustfollow a specific reporting format, which includes structured disclosures usingEuropean Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS).
* C. False- The CSRDapplies to both EU and non-EU companiesthat have operations in the EU and meet the reporting threshold criteria. Non-EU companies generatingmore than €150 millionin annual turnover in the EU and having at leastone EU-based subsidiary or branchare subject to CSRD requirements.
* D. True- The CSRD isinterlinked with other EU legislation, including theEU Taxonomy Regulation and theSustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), ensuring companies align with broader EU sustainability goals.
* E. False- Organizations must report onvalue chain informationas part of theimpact, risk, and opportunity (IRO) management processwithin the ESRS framework.
* F. False- The CSRD mandatesexternal assurancefor sustainability reports, starting withlimited assuranceand progressing towardreasonable assurancein the coming years.
* Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, Sections onDouble Materiality, Reporting Format, and Value Chain Information.
* EU Taxonomy Regulation & SFDR- Linkages with CSRD.
Official References:

質問 # 31
Which of the following are key steps in preparing to develop an ESRS report?
Select all that apply.

• A. Benchmarking and gap analysis.
• B. Setting up internal controls and stakeholder engagement processes.
• C. Preparing for materiality assessment.
• D. Disregarding stakeholder opinions.
• E. Planning for external assurance.
• F. Focusing solely on financial data collection.

正解：A、B、C、E

解説：
Preparing anESRS reportinvolves multiple key steps to ensure compliance with CSRD requirements. Below is an evaluation of each option:
* A. True-Internal controlsandstakeholder engagementare critical for ensuring accurate sustainability reporting. Stakeholders play a role inmateriality assessmentsand governance structures.
* B. True-Materiality assessmentis essential to determinewhich sustainability matters are most relevantfor disclosure. The ESRS framework requires organizations to report only onmaterial sustainability topics.
* C. False-Stakeholder opinions are crucialin sustainability reporting. Organizations must engage with employees, customers, investors, and affected communitiesto identify material sustainability matters.
* D. True-Benchmarking and gap analysishelp companies compare their sustainability performance againstESRS requirements, industry best practices, and peer organizations.
* E. False-Sustainability reporting goes beyond financial data collection.The ESRS requires environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures, which include qualitative and quantitative indicators.
* F. True-Planning for external assuranceis critical under the CSRD mandate, aslimited assurance is required initially, progressing toreasonable assurance by 2028.
Key Steps in ESRS Report PreparationStep
Purpose
Internal Controls & Stakeholder Engagement
Ensure accuracy and transparency in reporting
Materiality Assessment
Identify key sustainability topics for disclosure
Benchmarking & Gap Analysis
Compare with industry standards and ESRS requirements
External Assurance Planning
Prepare for third-party validation of sustainability data
* Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, Sections onMateriality Assessment, Internal Controls, and Assurance.
Official References:

質問 # 32
Indicate whether the following statement is true or false.
Policymakers and regulators worldwide are increasingly mandating limited assurance for sustainability reporting in Europe and mandatory assurance in all Asian and African countries.

• A. False
• B. True

正解：A

解説：
The statement that "Policymakers and regulators worldwide are increasingly mandating limited assurance for sustainability reporting in Europe and mandatory assurance in all Asian and African countries" isfalsefor the following reasons:
* Limited Assurance in Europe
* Under theCorporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), theEuropean Union (EU) is progressively implementing mandatory assurance for sustainability reporting, but it is starting with limited assurancebefore transitioning toreasonable assuranceby 2028.
* TheCommittee of European Auditing Oversight Bodies (CEAOB)has issuednon-binding guidelines on limited assuranceto harmonize the approach across EU member states.
* No Universal Mandatory Assurance in Asia and Africa
* Sustainability assurancevaries by countryinAsia and Africa, with some jurisdictions adopting voluntaryorlimitedrequirements rather thanmandatory assurance.
* TheEU approachis influencing global discussions, butthere is no blanket requirementfor full mandatory assurance acrossallAsian and African countries.
* While certainAsian countries (e.g., Japan, Singapore, China, and India)are enhancing their sustainability reporting frameworks, assurance requirements remaindiverse and sector- dependent.
* InAfrica, sustainability reporting is growing, especially in South Africa underKing IV principles
, but assurance isnot uniformly mandatoryacross the continent.
* Limited assurance is currently being phased in across the EU, but not yet fully mandated at the reasonable assurance level.
* There is no global requirement for mandatory assurance across all Asian and African countries.
* Therefore, the statement isfalse.
Conclusion:Official Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, various EFRAG guidance documents, and CSRD-related references:
* EU CSRD Recital 60: Roadmap for assurance from limited to reasonable.
* CEAOB Limited Assurance Guidelines (September 2024).

質問 # 33
......

100%無料ESRS-Professional日常練習試験には42問があります：https://jp.fast2test.com/ESRS-Professional-premium-file.html