DCPLA合格させる問題集でDSCI24時間で試験合格できます
最新問題を使おうDCPLA試験問題と解答でPDFで一年間無料更新
DSCI DCPLA 認定試験は、プライバシー評価と管理の知識とスキルを向上させたい専門家が高く求めている認定試験です。この認定は、機密情報を保護するために組織が必要とするプライバシー法律、規制、コンプライアンス要件について包括的な理解を個人に提供することを目的としています。
質問 # 24
Which of the following are the key factors that need to be considered for determining the applicability of the privacy principles? (Choose all that apply.)
- A. The role of the organization in determining the purpose of the data collection
- B. Organization's commitment to the external stakeholder with respect to privacy
- C. Requirements stipulated by the local authorities from where the organization operating
- D. How and where the data is coming in the organization
正解：A、D
質問 # 25
Its mandatory for the assessee to provide the pre-requisites to the assessor organization before commencement of the first phase of assessment.
- A. True
- B. False
正解：A
質問 # 26
Which of the following wasn't prescribed as a privacy principle under the OECD Privacy Guidelines, 1980?
- A. Data Minimization
- B. Security Safeguard
- C. Purpose Specification
- D. Openness
正解：D
質問 # 27
FILL BLANK
RCI and PCM
Given its global operations, the company is exposed to multiple regulations (privacy related) across the globe and needs to comply mostly through contracts for client relationships and directly for business functions. The corporate legal team is responsible for managing the contracts and understanding, interpreting and translating the legal requirements. There is no formal tracking of regulations done. The knowledge about regulations mainly comes through interaction with the client team. In most of the contracts, the clients have simply referred to the applicable legislations without going any further in terms of their applicability and impact on the company. Since business expansion is the priority, the contracts have been signed by the company without fully understanding their applicability and impact. Incidentally, when the privacy initiatives were being rolled out, a major data breach occurred at one of the healthcare clients located in the US. The US state data protection legislation required the client to notify the data breach. During investigations, it emerged that the data breach happened because of some vulnerability in the system owned by the client but managed by the company and the breach actually happened 5 months back and came to notice now. The system was used to maintain medical records of the patients. This vulnerability had been earlier identified by a third party vulnerability assessment of the system and the closure of vulnerability was assigned to the company. The company had made the requisite changes and informed the client. The client, however, was of the view that the changes were actually not made by the company and they therefore violated the terms of contract which stated that - "the company shall deploy appropriate organizational and technology measures for protection of personal information in compliance with the XX state data protection legislation." The company could not produce necessary evidences to prove that the configuration changes were actually made by it (including when these were made).
(Note: Candidates are requested to make and state assumptions wherever appropriate to reach a definitive conclusion) Introduction and Background XYZ is a major India based IT and Business Process Management (BPM) service provider listed at BSE and NSE. It has more than 1.5 lakh employees operating in 100 offices across 30 countries. It serves more than 500 clients across industry verticals - BFSI, Retail, Government, Healthcare, Telecom among others in Americas, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa. The company provides IT services including application development and maintenance, IT Infrastructure management, consulting, among others. It also offers IT products mainly for its BFSI customers.
The company is witnessing phenomenal growth in the BPM services over last few years including Finance & Accounting including credit card processing, Payroll processing, Customer support, Legal Process Outsourcing, among others and has rolled out platform based services. Most of the company's revenue comes from the US from the BFSI sector. In order to diversify its portfolio, the company is looking to expand its operations in Europe. India, too has attracted company's attention given the phenomenal increase in domestic IT spend esp. by the government through various large scale IT projects. The company is also very aggressive in the cloud and mobility space, with a strong focus on delivery of cloud services. When it comes to expanding operations in Europe, company is facing difficulties in realizing the full potential of the market because of privacy related concerns of the clients arising from the stringent regulatory requirements based on EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR).
To get better access to this market, the company decided to invest in privacy, so that it is able to provide increased assurance to potential clients in the EU and this will also benefit its US operations because privacy concerns are also on rise in the US. It will also help company leverage outsourcing opportunities in the Healthcare sector in the US which would involve protection of sensitive medical records of the US citizens.
The company believes that privacy will also be a key differentiator in the cloud business going forward. In short, privacy was taken up as a strategic initiative in the company in early 2011.
Since XYZ had an internal consulting arm, it assigned the responsibility of designing and implementing an enterprise wide privacy program to the consulting arm. The consulting arm had very good expertise in information security consulting but had limited expertise in the privacy domain. The project was to be driven by CIO's office, in close consultation with the Corporate Information Security and Legal functions.
Why do you think the company failed to defend itself against client accusations? (250 to 500 words)
正解：
解説：
The company failed to defend itself against accusations by its clients most likely due to the fact that it did not have enough expertise in privacy and data protection. The company's privacy program was designed and implemented by an internal consulting arm which had limited expertise in the domain, causing the program to be inadequate for the purpose of defending itself against accusations. Moreover, since the project was driven by CIO's office, there may have been a lack of coordination between different functions like Corporate Information Security and Legal functions which could also have contributed to the failure.
It is possible that there were gaps in the organizational measures deployed by XYZ as well as gaps in technology measures. For example, it is possible that although appropriate organizational measures were put in place, the technology measures were inadequate for protecting the sensitive data of its clients. In addition, it is possible that the company did not rigorously monitor compliance with these organizational and technological measures, thereby making it vulnerable to accusations by its clients.
It is also likely that XYZ was unable to fully comply with applicable privacy laws and regulations in the EU due to lack of awareness about their requirements as well as insufficient resources allocated for adapting to them. The EU GDPR requires companies to implement appropriate technical and organizational measures for the protection of personal data which could have been a challenge for XYZ given its limited expertise in this domain. Furthermore, even though it may have had some understanding of the legal requirements, there may have been difficulty in properly implementing them, which could have led to the accusations by its clients.
Finally, it is possible that XYZ failed to defend itself against client accusations because of a lack of communication between its different departments and functions. The company may not have had a clear understanding of the requirements and risks associated with data protection and privacy compliance which could have caused miscommunication among various stakeholders leading to inadequate responses when it was challenged by its clients.
Overall this case study demonstrates the importance of properly designing and implementing an effective privacy program in order to protect sensitive data from unauthorized access or misuse. Companies should ensure that they have adequate expertise in data protection as well as sufficient resources for adapting to changing regulatory requirements in order to avoid potential legal issues arising from client accusations.
Effective communication and coordination across different departments and functions is also essential for successful data protection compliance.
It is recommended that companies invest in an ongoing training program to ensure that employees understand the importance of privacy, have an awareness of the legal requirements, and are able to properly implement security measures to protect sensitive data. Organizations should also consider implementing automated tools and technologies such as encryption, access control systems, identity management solutions, etc., which can help them better defend themselves against potential client accusations.
質問 # 28
__________ calls for inclusion of data protection from the onset of the designing of systems.
- A. Agile Model
- B. Safeguarding Approach
- C. Logical Design
- D. Privacy by Design
正解：D
質問 # 29
Which of the following could be considered as triggers for updating privacy policy? (Choose all that apply.)
- A. Change in service provider for an established business process
- B. Regulatory changes
- C. Privacy breach
- D. Recruitment of more employees
正解：B、C
質問 # 30
Which of the following are classified as Sensitive Personal Data or Information under Section 43A of ITAA, 2008? (Choose all that apply.)
- A. Sexual orientation
- B. Biometric information
- C. Password
- D. Caste and religious beliefs
- E. Financial information
- F. Medical records and history
正解：A、B、E、F
質問 # 31
Which of the following statements is true with respect to organization's privacy training and awareness program?
- A. It should cover employees of service provider dealing with personal information
- B. It should define roles and responsibilities of personnel in privacy function
- C. None of the above
- D. It should necessarily cover officials from Law Enforcement Agencies that request lawful access to personal information
正解：B
質問 # 32
Which of the following parameters should ideally be addressed by a privacy program of an organization?
(Choose all that apply.)
- A. Privacy incident response plan and grievance handling
- B. Intellectual Property (IP) protection
- C. Environmental security concerns
- D. Training and data classification
正解：A、D
質問 # 33
'Map the legal and compliance requirements to each data element that an organization is dealing with in all of its business processes, enterprise and operational functions, and client relationships.' This an imperative of which DPF practice area?
- A. Regulatory Compliance Intelligence (RCI)
- B. Privacy Organization and Relationship (POR)
- C. Visibility over Personal Information (VPI)
- D. Privacy Policy and Processes (PPP)
正解：D
質問 # 34
Which of the following is not an objective of VPI?
- A. Enable an organization to map its data operations and categorization of PI
- B. None of the above
- C. Assess the current state of data spread and transactions of the organization to map this against its privacy objectives
- D. To enable identification of processes, functions and relationships handling personal information
正解：B
質問 # 35
Which of the following measures can an organization implement to establish regulatory compliance intelligence? (Choose all that apply.)
- A. Ensure that a mechanism exists for quick and effective provisioning, de-provisioning and authorization of access to information or systems which are exposed to data
- B. Identify the liabilities imposed by the regulations with respect to specific data elements
- C. Ensure that knowledge with respect to legal and regulatory compliances is managed effectively
- D. Establish a process that keeps a track of applicable legal and regulatory changes
正解：B、D
質問 # 36
How are privacy and data protection related to each other?
- A. The terms 'privacy' and 'data protection' are interchangeable.
- B. They are unrelated.
- C. Data protection is a subset of privacy.
- D. Privacy is a subset of data protection.
正解：C
質問 # 37
FILL BLANK
RCI and PCM
Given its global operations, the company is exposed to multiple regulations (privacy related) across the globe and needs to comply mostly through contracts for client relationships and directly for business functions. The corporate legal team is responsible for managing the contracts and understanding, interpreting and translating the legal requirements. There is no formal tracking of regulations done. The knowledge about regulations mainly comes through interaction with the client team. In most of the contracts, the clients have simply referred to the applicable legislations without going any further in terms of their applicability and impact on the company. Since business expansion is the priority, the contracts have been signed by the company without fully understanding their applicability and impact. Incidentally, when the privacy initiatives were being rolled out, a major data breach occurred at one of the healthcare clients located in the US. The US state data protection legislation required the client to notify the data breach. During investigations, it emerged that the data breach happened because of some vulnerability in the system owned by the client but managed by the company and the breach actually happened 5 months back and came to notice now. The system was used to maintain medical records of the patients. This vulnerability had been earlier identified by a third party vulnerability assessment of the system and the closure of vulnerability was assigned to the company. The company had made the requisite changes and informed the client. The client, however, was of the view that the changes were actually not made by the company and they therefore violated the terms of contract which stated that - "the company shall deploy appropriate organizational and technology measures for protection of personal information in compliance with the XX state data protection legislation." The company could not produce necessary evidences to prove that the configuration changes were actually made by it (including when these were made).
(Note: Candidates are requested to make and state assumptions wherever appropriate to reach a definitive conclusion) Introduction and Background XYZ is a major India based IT and Business Process Management (BPM) service provider listed at BSE and NSE. It has more than 1.5 lakh employees operating in 100 offices across 30 countries. It serves more than 500 clients across industry verticals - BFSI, Retail, Government, Healthcare, Telecom among others in Americas, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa. The company provides IT services including application development and maintenance, IT Infrastructure management, consulting, among others. It also offers IT products mainly for its BFSI customers.
The company is witnessing phenomenal growth in the BPM services over last few years including Finance & Accounting including credit card processing, Payroll processing, Customer support, Legal Process Outsourcing, among others and has rolled out platform based services. Most of the company's revenue comes from the US from the BFSI sector. In order to diversify its portfolio, the company is looking to expand its operations in Europe. India, too has attracted company's attention given the phenomenal increase in domestic IT spend esp. by the government through various large scale IT projects. The company is also very aggressive in the cloud and mobility space, with a strong focus on delivery of cloud services. When it comes to expanding operations in Europe, company is facing difficulties in realizing the full potential of the market because of privacy related concerns of the clients arising from the stringent regulatory requirements based on EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR).
To get better access to this market, the company decided to invest in privacy, so that it is able to provide increased assurance to potential clients in the EU and this will also benefit its US operations because privacy concerns are also on rise in the US. It will also help company leverage outsourcing opportunities in the Healthcare sector in the US which would involve protection of sensitive medical records of the US citizens.
The company believes that privacy will also be a key differentiator in the cloud business going forward. In short, privacy was taken up as a strategic initiative in the company in early 2011.
Since XYZ had an internal consulting arm, it assigned the responsibility of designing and implementing an enterprise wide privacy program to the consulting arm. The consulting arm had very good expertise in information security consulting but had limited expertise in the privacy domain. The project was to be driven by CIO's office, in close consultation with the Corporate Information Security and Legal functions.
What should be the learning for the company going forward? What should the consultants suggest? (250 to 500 words)
正解：
解説：
The consultants should suggest a comprehensive and integrated privacy program for the company which addresses the current regulatory requirements while being proactive in anticipating any changes to these regulations. The program should be effective, flexible, cost-efficient and easy to understand & implement.
To begin with, the program should involve an assessment of all existing processes and procedures that are related to personal data processing in order to identify potential areas of risk. The potential risks along with recommended mitigating controls should then be documented in a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) report.
This will enable the organization to assess its compliance level against applicable regulations.
It is also important for XYZ to have strong Data Governance policies & procedures along with appropriate organizational structures and accountability mechanisms in place. This will include a Data Privacy Officer (DPO) who is responsible for overseeing the compliance program and being the point of contact for data protection supervisory authorities. The DPO should be part of the management team and report to the CIO's office as well as senior-level executives.
A consultant should also recommend data minimization, pseudonymization, encryption, and other security measures to protect personal information. In addition, they can recommend regular privacy awareness training sessions for employees, so that they are up-to-date on changes in regulations and understand how their role impacts data privacy and security. Lastly, all systems & processes should be monitored & audited to ensure compliance with relevant regulations.
As a result, consultants should provide clients in the EU and US with an integrated & comprehensive privacy program that provides the necessary assurances and protects sensitive data from unauthorized access or misuse. By leveraging outsourcing opportunities in the healthcare sector in the US, XYZ could potentially gain competitive advantage.
質問 # 38
FILL BLANK
PPP
Based on the visibility exercise, the consultants created a single privacy policy applicable to all the client relationships and business functions. The policy detailed out what PI company deals with, how it is used, what security measures are deployed for protection, to whom it is shared, etc. Given the need to address all the client relationships and business functions, through a single policy, the privacy policy became very lengthy and complex. The privacy policy was published on company's intranet and also circulated to heads of all the relationships and functions. W.r.t. some client relationships, there was also confusion whether the privacy policy should be notified to the end customers of the clients as the company was directly collecting PI as part of the delivery of BPM services. The heads found it difficult to understand the policy (as they could not directly relate to it) and what actions they need to perform. To assuage their concerns, a training workshop was conducted for 1 day. All the relationship and function heads attended the training. However, the training could not be completed in the given time, as there were numerous questions from the audiences and it took lot of time to clarify.
(Note: Candidates are requested to make and state assumptions wherever appropriate to reach a definitive conclusion) Introduction and Background XYZ is a major India based IT and Business Process Management (BPM) service provider listed at BSE and NSE. It has more than 1.5 lakh employees operating in 100 offices across 30 countries. It serves more than 500 clients across industry verticals - BFSI, Retail, Government, Healthcare, Telecom among others in Americas, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa. The company provides IT services including application development and maintenance, IT Infrastructure management, consulting, among others. It also offers IT products mainly for its BFSI customers.
The company is witnessing phenomenal growth in the BPM services over last few years including Finance & Accounting including credit card processing, Payroll processing, Customer support, Legal Process Outsourcing, among others and has rolled out platform based services. Most of the company's revenue comes from the US from the BFSI sector. In order to diversify its portfolio, the company is looking to expand its operations in Europe. India, too has attracted company's attention given the phenomenal increase in domestic IT spend esp. by the government through various large scale IT projects. The company is also very aggressive in the cloud and mobility space, with a strong focus on delivery of cloud services. When it comes to expanding operations in Europe, company is facing difficulties in realizing the full potential of the market because of privacy related concerns of the clients arising from the stringent regulatory requirements based on EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR).
To get better access to this market, the company decided to invest in privacy, so that it is able to provide increased assurance to potential clients in the EU and this will also benefit its US operations because privacy concerns are also on rise in the US. It will also help company leverage outsourcing opportunities in the Healthcare sector in the US which would involve protection of sensitive medical records of the US citizens.
The company believes that privacy will also be a key differentiator in the cloud business going forward. In short, privacy was taken up as a strategic initiative in the company in early 2011.
Since XYZ had an internal consulting arm, it assigned the responsibility of designing and implementing an enterprise wide privacy program to the consulting arm. The consulting arm had very good expertise in information security consulting but had limited expertise in the privacy domain. The project was to be driven by CIO's office, in close consultation with the Corporate Information Security and Legal functions.
Given the confusion among relationship and function heads, how would you proceed to address the problem and ensure that policy is well understood and deployed? (250 to 500 words)
正解：
解説：
In order to address the confusion among relationship and function heads, it is important to ensure that the privacy policy is effectively communicated and understood by all stakeholders. The following steps can be taken towards this end:
1. Awareness Campaigns - In order to educate the stakeholders about the importance of data privacy, various awareness campaigns should be launched through digital media, print media, and seminars. These campaigns must include topics such as why data privacy is important, the consequences of not adhering to the policy, and how to comply with it.
2. Training - In addition to awareness campaigns, proper training should be provided to all stakeholders on data privacy policies and procedures. The training should also focus on best practices such as secure coding, encryption techniques etc., so that they understand the importance of these security measures in protecting data from unauthorized access.
3. Policies and Procedures - All stakeholders should have access to a clear set of policies and procedures governing their actions related to data privacy. Such guidelines should include information about the types of sensitive information which needs to be kept confidential, what constitutes a violation of the policy, and how to take corrective measures if a violation occurs.
4. Auditing - The effectiveness of all the policies and procedures should be regularly audited in order to ensure that the data privacy policy is being followed properly. Any discrepancies or violations must be reported immediately so that appropriate action can be taken.
5. Reporting Mechanism - A reporting mechanism should also be put into place for stakeholders to report any suspected errors or breaches in data privacy policies. This will help in identifying potential risks early on and taking corrective action as soon as possible.
These initiatives will not only reduce confusion among relationship and function heads but will also help build trust with customers by ensuring proper implementation of enterprise-wide privacy program, which in turn will help the company in leveraging outsourcing opportunities. Lastly, by following all these measures, the company will be able to demonstrate its commitment towards privacy and create a secure environment for its customers.
In conclusion, in order to ensure that policy is well understood and deployed, it is important to take appropriate steps such as launching awareness campaigns, providing training to stakeholders on data privacy policies, auditing policies and procedures regularly, and setting up a reporting mechanism for errors or breaches. Doing so will reduce confusion among relationship and function heads and help build trust with customers by ensuring proper implementation of an enterprise-wide privacy program.
質問 # 39
In the landmark case _______________ the Honourable Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the status of Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right under Part III of the constitution.
- A. M. P. Sharma and others vs. Satish Chandra, District Magistrate, Delhi, and others
- B. Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation
- C. Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs. Union of India And Ors
- D. Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
正解：C
質問 # 40
......
DSCI DCPLA（DSCI認定プライバシーリードアセッサー）認定試験は、組織内でプライバシープログラムをリードする能力を測定する包括的な評価です。この認定は、データプライバシーの分野で働き、プライバシープログラムの設計、実装、管理を担当する専門家を対象としています。DCPLA認定は、プライバシー専門家のスキルと知識を評価する標準化されたフレームワークを提供するよう設計されています。
最新問題をダウンロードDCPLA問題集で2023年最新のDCPLA試験問題集：https://jp.fast2test.com/DCPLA-premium-file.html
最新のDSCI DCPLA認定練習テスト問題：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gonwpxJGbD2F9X40p2tW6vI3GdA_IU9e