2025年更新のAD0-E906問題集合格保証付きで合格できます！
AD0-E906試験問題集を試そう！ベストAD0-E906試験問題トレーニングを提供しています
Adobe AD0-E906 認定試験の出題範囲：
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
質問 # 24
Given the following workflow launcher configuration:
What change should be made to the configuration to trigger the workflow?
- A. Modify the condition to dc ==image/
- B. Modify the node type to nt:file
- C. Modify the path to /content/dam/.<em>/)en(/.<em>/)
正解：A
解説：
In this scenario, the workflow launcher is configured to trigger a workflow for assets in the path /content/dam/projects/en/designs. However, to ensure that the workflow only triggers for image assets, the condition must be updated to filter the relevant asset types. The condition should be modified to dc:format==image/*, which ensures that only assets with an image format trigger the workflow.
Condition "dc
==image/*": This filters assets based on their format (MIME type), ensuring that the workflow is only triggered for images, which matches the use case of working with assets such as JPGs or PNGs.
Option B suggests modifying the path, but the existing path (/content/dam/projects/en/designs) is correct for the project structure. Option C suggests changing the node type to nt:file, which is incorrect since the node type for assets in AEM is typically dam:Asset.
For more information, refer to AEM documentation on workflow launchers and DAM metadata properties.
質問 # 25
During an Adobe Workfront implementation that also involves the installation of the AEM Enhanced Connector, the consultant is working with the customer on metadata As part of the engagement it has been established that the customer will use projects within Workfront to represent the work required to deliver a single asset, in the past, the customer had no strategy around metadata, which led to it not being managed correctly. Therefore, the customer wants to understand the best practices around capturing metadata while keeping things as simple as possible.
what should the consultant recommend?
- A. Create a project custom loon capturing the key details related to asset creation and mop these
- B. Create a document custom form capturing key asset details and map this along with Project details
- C. Do not create any custom forms and instead map Project, Document, Task and Issue details
正解：B
解説：
The best practice for managing metadata in this case is to:
Create a document custom form: This form will capture the essential metadata details for the asset, such as title, description, and other key attributes, ensuring that the metadata is structured and managed correctly from the start.
Map the custom form fields along with project details: By mapping this information from Workfront to AEM, the metadata is automatically synchronized, reducing manual work and ensuring consistency across both systems.
Option B, which involves not creating custom forms, would likely lead to the same lack of metadata management as before. Option C suggests creating a project custom form, which is less relevant for capturing specific asset metadata.
Refer to Adobe Workfront Enhanced Connector documentation for more on best practices around metadata management and custom forms.
質問 # 26
A user applies a custom metadata schema to a folder in AEM Assets However, the user receives an error message. "Unable to edit properties", when trying to save changes to one of the metadata properties for all assets within that folder.
What are two reasons for receiving this message? (Choose two.)
- A. The assets in that folder have been check out/locked by another user.
- B. The metadata property being modified is mapped to an invalid path.
- C. Two or more metadata properties in the schema are mapped to the same path.
- D. The user does not have the Modify permission allowed for the folder.
正解：B、D
解説：
There are two possible reasons for receiving the "Unable to edit properties" error when trying to save metadata properties in AEM:
Insufficient Modify Permission: The user needs to have Modify permissions for the folder or assets within the folder to be able to edit the metadata. Without this permission, changes to metadata cannot be saved.
Invalid Metadata Path: If a metadata property in the schema is mapped to an invalid JCR path, AEM will not be able to save the changes. The system requires valid paths in the JCR to store metadata properties correctly, and any invalid path will result in an error.
Option B, involving asset locking, would prevent editing altogether rather than giving an error during property saving. Option C, mapping two properties to the same path, would result in overwriting issues rather than an error about saving properties.
For more details, refer to AEM's Metadata Schema documentation and permissions management.
質問 # 27
A customer finds an Ul issue with component (/apps/<customer-project>/<component-name>) on AEM page It needs to be fixed urgently to avoid miscommunication. The developer has been asked to urgently make the change in AEM production.
How should the developer deploy the change to an AEM Cloud Service production environment?
- A. Due to the urgency of the request. Make the Ul fix directly to the component on AEM Production using CRXOE and then make same change to customer code bate
- B. Fix the component on local AEM and create an AEM package for that specific component that can be deployed to Production using package Manager as a one-off urgent fix
- C. Fix the Ul issue as part of the customer code base and deploy the change to immutable repository using Cloud Manage' pipeline
正解：C
解説：
In AEM Cloud Service, the correct approach to making changes, even urgent ones, is to update the codebase and deploy it through the Cloud Manager pipeline. This ensures that the change is part of the version-controlled, immutable repository and follows best practices for deployment.
Immutable infrastructure: AEMaaCS does not allow direct modifications to production environments (e.g., via CRXDE Lite). All changes must be deployed through Cloud Manager, ensuring consistency and traceability.
Making changes directly on production via CRXDE or deploying one-off fixes using the Package Manager (Options B and C) violates AEMaaCS's immutable infrastructure principle and is not supported.
Refer to Adobe Cloud Manager's documentation for best practices on deploying urgent fixes in AEM as a Cloud Service.
質問 # 28
A consultant is working with a customer's Marketing department on an Adobe Workfront engagement. The customer has already had a successful deployment of Workfront in the IT department. This installation has been extremely simple, with a single system administrator, five custom statuses used by the IT department, and some templates and reports. The director of Marketing is adamant that the Marketing department will not be using anything created for IT. The engagement cannot disrupt the existing installation.
Which approach should the consultant take?
- A. Create groups for Marketing and it. create a group administrator for each, and share each department's resources with the group
- B. Create team for Marketing and IT, create a tear administrator fix each, and share each department's resources with the team
- C. Create companies for Marketing and IT create a system administrator for each, and share each department's resources with the company
正解：A
解説：
In this scenario, the best approach is to create separate groups for Marketing and IT within the same Workfront instance. Each group will have its own group administrator, and each department's resources (e.g., custom statuses, templates, reports) can be isolated and managed independently by the group admins.
This solution ensures that:
The existing IT setup is not disrupted.
The Marketing department can have its own customized Workfront environment without overlapping with IT's configurations.
This approach avoids creating unnecessary complexity (as in Option A with companies) or restricting functionality (as in Option B with teams).
Refer to Workfront documentation on group management to learn how to implement group-specific configurations in a single instance.
質問 # 29
A request form has a calculated field Allowable Days that calculates the number of days between the request Entry Date and the custom field Required Delivery Date.
What must be set up on the corresponding Prefect custom form so the Required Delivery Dale and the original number of Allowable Days display on the project?
- A. Add both Allowable Days and Required Denver Dale as calculated fields referencing the request object.
- B. Add Allowable Days as a calculated field and add Required Delivery Dale as a text field.
- C. Add both the Allowable Days and the Required Delivery Date fields as new text fields.
正解：B
解説：
In this scenario, the calculated field Allowable Days and the Required Delivery Date need to display on the project. To achieve this:
Allowable Days: This is a calculated field, so it should be set up as a calculated field in the project custom form, which references the difference between the Request Entry Date and the Required Delivery Date.
Required Delivery Date: This is a static field and should be displayed as a text field to ensure that the original requested delivery date is retained.
Option B is incorrect because both fields do not need to be calculated. The Required Delivery Date is already a static value and doesn't require calculation.
For more information, refer to the Workfront documentation on setting up calculated fields and text fields in custom forms.
質問 # 30
A user wants to send a new version of a document they have uploaded to Workfront (o make sure that this latest version is now available in Adobe Experience Manager Assets. This document has previously been uploaded into both Workfront and the AEM.
How should the user accomplish this?
- A. Select the document in Workfront. select New Version, choose the Experience Manager integration, upload the revised version
- B. Select the document in workfront. make sure it has the same name as the previous version, click Send to. Choose. The experience Manager integration
- C. Select the document in Workfront rename to include the version number. click Send to. choose the experience Manager integration
正解：A
解説：
To upload a new version of a document and ensure it is available in AEM Assets, the user must select the New Version option in Workfront. This triggers the version control process where the updated file can be uploaded.
By choosing the Experience Manager integration after selecting New Version, the system ensures that the latest version of the document is sent to AEM Assets, where it will replace the previous version without losing version history.
This workflow supports maintaining version control between Workfront and AEM, ensuring that the most current version of the asset is always available in both systems.
Refer to the Workfront-AEM Enhanced Connector Guide for further details on version control and document updates between Workfront and AEM.
質問 # 31
A large enterprise purchased Adobe workfront during a 'Land & Expand' Workfront campaign The legal department saw the Workfront document approval functionality and felt it would be good for their department. They know that to be effective, they must be in the same instance as marketing.
The partner lead wants to collaborate with sales on how to approach this opportunity, when discussing with the marketing team, there was immediate pushback and the marketing manager refused to consider Workfront s group admin features.
Which first step would motivate marketing to endorse a single Workfront Instance across the enterprise?
- A. A demo to marketing tailored for multiple groups
- B. Executive/Stakeholder Engagement
- C. Training marketing on group admin functions
正解：B
解説：
To motivate Marketing to endorse a single Workfront instance across the enterprise, the best first step is to initiate Executive/Stakeholder Engagement. By getting senior leadership or key stakeholders from both the legal and marketing departments involved, it helps align the goals of the organization and illustrates the value of a unified system.
Executive engagement can help overcome resistance from individual departments (such as Marketing) by emphasizing the strategic importance of having a centralized system and showcasing the benefits for the entire organization.
Options A (training on group admin functions) and B (demo tailored for multiple groups) are useful but would not be as impactful as engaging executives to drive the initiative from the top down.
Refer to Workfront's adoption and implementation strategies for more information on how to engage stakeholders effectively.
質問 # 32
An AEM application requires a service user WRITE access to children nodes but not on the parent node itself. Which console should the developer use to apply appropriate ACL?
- A. Permission console
- B. User Management console
- C. Group Management console
正解：A
解説：
In AEM, when you need to manage access control (ACL) permissions, including setting specific permissions (like WRITE) for a service user on child nodes without affecting the parent node, the Permission Console is the appropriate tool.
The Permission Console allows you to set fine-grained permissions at both node and subnode levels, which is crucial for scenarios where access needs to be applied only to children nodes, not the parent node itself.
Option A (User Management Console) is used for managing user details, and Option C (Group Management Console) manages group settings, but neither of these are used for setting node-level permissions.
Refer to AEM's User and Group Access Management documentation for more information on using the Permission Console to manage ACLs effectively.
質問 # 33
A developer needs to deploy com myCompany.ui.content package to only AEM Cloud Service author environment Which option should the developer choose to meet the requirement?
- A.
- B.
- C.
- D.
正解：D
解説：
The requirement is to deploy the com.myCompany.ui.content package specifically to the AEM Cloud Service author environment. The key here is ensuring that the package is targeted correctly to the author instance, without affecting other environments.
Option A uses the following target:
<target>/apps/my-company-packages/content/install.author</target>
The use of install.author ensures that the package will only be installed on the author environment of AEM as a Cloud Service, meeting the developer's requirement. This is a common approach in AEM Cloud Service projects, where you differentiate between environments using the appropriate subfolder (in this case, author).
Option B (author.install) and Option D are similar but incorrect because they are not standard for specifying the exact environment, while Option C (install/) is too generic and could apply to both author and publish environments.
Refer to the AEM Cloud Service documentation on deployment and package management for more details on targeting specific environments such as author during content deployment.
質問 # 34
A project manager wants to ensure that all documents within a certain project are shared with a designated team in Workfront What is the correct option for carrying out this action?
- A. Share one of the documents the others will inherit the same access levels
- B. Link all the necessary document from Experience Manager to the designated project
- C. Find the project where these document all reside and share it with the entire team
正解：C
解説：
In Workfront, the best way to ensure that all documents within a project are shared with a designated team is to share the entire project. By sharing the project, all documents and related assets within that project are automatically made available to the designated team members according to the project's access permissions.
Option C is incorrect because sharing one document does not automatically inherit the same access levels for the other documents. Option A suggests linking documents from AEM, but the question pertains to sharing documents within Workfront itself.
Refer to Workfront's documentation on document sharing for detailed instructions on how to share all project-related assets with teams.
質問 # 35
An implementation consultant is preparing to configure the enhanced connector between AEM and Workfront. As part of this, the consultant needs to make sure the firewall is properly configured.
Which two critical processes utilized by the enhanced connector does this allow? (Choose two.)
- A. Webhooks
- B. Single sign-on (SSD)
- C. Experience Manager Workflows
- D. Evert Subscriptions
正解：A、D
解説：
To ensure proper functioning of the Enhanced Connector between AEM and Workfront, it is critical that the firewall allows traffic for Event Subscriptions and Webhooks:
Event Subscriptions: These are necessary for synchronizing events between Workfront and AEM, such as when assets are modified or when metadata is updated.
Webhooks: Webhooks enable real-time data exchange and notifications between the two systems, allowing instant updates to flow between Workfront and AEM.
Option A (Experience Manager Workflows) is relevant within AEM but not directly tied to firewall configuration for the connector. Option B (Single Sign-On) is a security feature but not specifically tied to the Enhanced Connector's data synchronization processes.
Refer to the Workfront Enhanced Connector documentation for details on the processes that rely on Event Subscriptions and Webhooks.
質問 # 36
An AEM application must process a high volume of content ingestion on the author server What Is a key factor to optimize a design for overall performance gain for implementing workflows?
- A. Use Schedulers to the workflow only one weekends
- B. Use Transient workflowers
- C. Allocate more RAM for the content ingestion up front
正解：B
解説：
When handling high-volume content ingestion in AEM, transient workflows are a key factor for optimizing performance. Transient workflows do not persist workflow data in the JCR repository, which greatly reduces the load on the repository and improves overall performance. Since content ingestion typically involves processing a large number of assets, using transient workflows prevents unnecessary data accumulation in the repository.
Transient workflows are ideal for operations where you don't need to keep historical data about each workflow instance, such as ingestion processes, thereby making the system faster and more efficient.
Option A (using schedulers) is not related to workflow performance, and Option B (allocating more RAM) is a generic solution but not directly tied to optimizing workflow efficiency.
For further guidance, refer to AEM's documentation on workflow optimization and transient workflows.
質問 # 37
A company uploads several images that represent products Each product is associated with a unique SKU number. The product owner wants the ability to search for multiple products by SKU number.
Which two steps must be completed to do this? (Choose two.)
- A. Customize the Assets Admin Search rail lo Include a Multi Value Properly Predicate and configure the property name to the SKU number
- B. Customize the Assets Admin Search rail to include a Single Property Predicate and configure the property name to the SKU number
- C. Customize the mage metadata schema and add a new Single Line Text Held for the SKU number
- D. Customize the mage metadata schema and add a new Multi Value Text field for the SKU number
正解：A、C
解説：
To enable the search of products by SKU number in AEM, two main configurations are required:
Multi Value Property Predicate: By using a Multi Value Property Predicate, users can search for multiple SKU numbers at once. This is crucial if product owners need to query for multiple products simultaneously.
Single Line Text Field for SKU: SKU numbers are typically unique, so adding a Single Line Text field to the image metadata schema for SKU numbers ensures that each image has its own SKU field for accurate identification during searches.
Option D is incorrect because SKUs are usually single, unique identifiers, so a Multi Value Text field isn't necessary for each SKU.
Refer to AEM's documentation on customizing metadata schemas and Assets Admin Search to implement these features.
質問 # 38
An implementation consultant wants to configure the enhanced connector inside a customer's Adobe experience Manager environment. The customer has expressed interest in automatically publishing assets when they ore sent from Adobe Workfront to Adobe Experience Manager. The customer does no! have an instance of Brand Portal running.
The customer has a project custom form field with the following details:
The customer wants this automatic publishing to be conditional on the value of the project custom form field being equal to, Yes.
Which option should be used to implement this feature?
- A. Check the option, 'Automatically publish assets when sent from Workfront' In the advanced tab of the configuration properties. In the Custom from field dropdown select. "CUSTOM FORM auto_publiah_asset', and in the Custom from field value text box. write ''Yes".
- B. Check the option. 'Automatically publish assets when sent from Workflow' in the advanced tab of the configuration properties in the Custom form field dropdown select. "CUSTOM FORMS Automatically Publish Assets'', and in the Custom form field value lent box, write 'Yes''.
- C. Check the option, 'Publish all prefect assets to Brand Portal upon project completion.' In the advanced tab of the configuration properties in the Custom form field dropdown select. 'CUSTOM FORMS auto_publish_assets', and in the Custom form field value text box. write "Yes".
正解：A
解説：
To implement conditional automatic publishing of assets from Workfront to AEM based on the value of the custom form field, you should:
Check the option "Automatically publish assets when sent from Workfront": This ensures that the assets will be automatically published to AEM when they are sent from Workfront.
Use the custom form field ("auto_publish_assets"): The system needs to check the value of this custom form field, and if it is set to "Yes", the assets will be automatically published.
Set the Custom Form Field Value to "Yes": In the configuration, you'll specify that automatic publishing only occurs when the field value is "Yes." Option B incorrectly refers to "Workflow" instead of "Workfront," and Option C refers to publishing to Brand Portal, which is irrelevant since the customer does not have Brand Portal.
Refer to Workfront for AEM Enhanced Connector documentation for step-by-step guidance on configuring conditional automatic asset publishing.
質問 # 39
A company purchases Adobe Workfront with a team plan and no Third-party products. They occasionally need to upload a document related to a task for approval. Users do not need to mark up and comment on the uploaded documents, in addition, electronic validation is not currently a requirement.
which tool should be used to meet this need?
- A. Workfront Proof
- B. AdobeSign
- C. Document approvals
正解：C
解説：
Given that the company only occasionally needs to upload documents for approval and does not require advanced features like markup or electronic validation, the Document approvals feature in Workfront is the best choice.
Document approvals allow users to upload documents, assign approvers, and receive approval/rejection responses without the need for advanced proofing or signing functionality.
Options A (Workfront Proof) and B (AdobeSign) provide more advanced capabilities like markup, commenting, and e-signatures, which are unnecessary for this use case.
Refer to Workfront's document management features for more information on basic approval workflows.
質問 # 40
A solutions consultant needs to configure the enhanced connector for a customer. The customer has asked the solutions consultant to make sure that changes to metadata in Experience Manager will be synced back to Workfront on linked Workfront documents. Two of the fields that the customer wants synced are Content Type and Effort They are defined in workfront and Experience Manager as the following:
Document custom form fields in Workfront:
To accomplish this work, the solutions consultant configures a workflow model. The workflow model has a single step, Workfront-Map Property'.
What Property Assignments will make sure changes in Experience Manager are reflected in Workfront?
- A.
- B.
- C.
正解：B
解説：
To ensure that changes in metadata in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) are synced back to Workfront for the fields Content Type and Effort, the correct property assignment should map the Workfront custom form fields to the corresponding paths in the AEM JCR repository.
In Option A:
CUSTOM FORMS
is mapped to /jcr:content/metadata/content-type
CUSTOM FORMS
is mapped to /jcr:content/metadata/effort
This configuration ensures that changes made in AEM's content-type and effort metadata properties will be reflected in the respective custom fields in Workfront.
Options B and C use incorrect prefixes (e.g., "DE:") and would not map the properties correctly for synchronization between Workfront and AEM.
Refer to the Workfront Enhanced Connector documentation for detailed instructions on configuring metadata synchronization between AEM and Workfront.
質問 # 41
A multi-faceted holiday promotion requires inputs from many different teams that manage promotional advertisements across varying marketing platforms Each marketing platform (i.e, social media and email blast) has different requirements for the ads. Each asset associated with the holiday promotion has its own workflow, which is unique to the team responsible for producing the asset. This holiday promotion is considered one of the most critical promotions for the year and is tracked in a campaign Portfolio Leadership needs visibility to the promotion assets to make sure they are tracking for an on-time delivery as they progress.
what is the correct way to track the assets associated with this promotion using a Program?
- A. Establish a Program for each marketing platform, associate each Project with the Program create a Program level Custom Form Flew for the holiday promotion, create a Project Repot filtered to the holiday promotion, share the Report with the stakeholders.
- B. Establish the holiday promotion as a Program, associate each Protect with the program. create a Pitted Report filtered to the Program, share the Report with the stakeholders
- C. Establish the holiday promotion as a Program, associate each Prefect with the Program, create a Project level Custom Form Field for the holiday promotion, create a Protect Report filtered to the holiday promotion, share the Report with the stakeholders.
正解：C
解説：
For a multi-faceted holiday promotion involving several teams and unique workflows, the best way to track the associated assets is to:
Establish the holiday promotion as a Program: This allows all related projects, each corresponding to a specific marketing platform (e.g., social media, email), to be grouped under a single program for easy tracking.
Associate each project with the Program: This ensures that all related assets and workflows are linked to the holiday promotion and can be reported on collectively.
Create a Project-level Custom Form Field: This will capture specific details related to the holiday promotion for each project, allowing for more tailored reporting.
Create a Project Report filtered to the holiday promotion: This report will enable leadership and stakeholders to track the progress of all assets related to the promotion and ensure on-time delivery.
Option A involves creating a Program for each platform, which adds unnecessary complexity. Option B is similar but lacks the specific tracking of custom fields at the project level.
Refer to Workfront's documentation on managing Programs and custom forms for details on setting up and reporting on large campaigns.
質問 # 42
As part of the configuration of the workfront for Experience Manager enhanced connector, the solutions consultant needs to limit the access of the legal team Specifically, the legal team should only have read access to all of the content in Experience Manager. This group of users will solely be working in Workfront. but will have access to Experience Manager via the enhanced connector. The consultant has created a new user group in Experience Manager that includes the members of the legal team that exist in wf-workfront-users.
How should the solution consultant manage their access?
- A. By adding the legal user group to the AEM provided Everyone user group
- B. By applying ACEs to the wf-workfront-users user group
- C. By adding the legal group to the AEM provided Contributors user group
正解：B
解説：
In this case, the solutions consultant needs to limit the legal team's access to read-only for all content in AEM. Since the legal team will be working in Workfront and accessing AEM via the enhanced connector, the best way to manage their access is to apply Access Control Entries (ACEs) to the wf-workfront-users user group.
ACEs allow you to specify detailed permissions for a group or user in AEM, such as granting read-only access to specific resources or folders within the DAM.
Options A and C would either grant too much access (as in the case of the Everyone user group) or allow contributions, which is beyond the requirement of just reading access.
Refer to AEM Access Control Management documentation to learn more about setting up ACEs and managing permissions.
質問 # 43
A custom field must be created to represent the Creative Manager and allow the selection of an existing resource name in the Workfront application Which type of field and object type should be selected?
- A. Field Type - Checkboxes
Object type- User - B. Field type - Calculated Field
Object type -Manager - C. Field type Typeahead
Object type User
正解：C
解説：
The requirement is to allow users to select a resource (Creative Manager) from a list of existing users in the Workfront application. The appropriate solution is to use a Typeahead field with the User object type.
Field type - Typeahead: This field allows users to start typing the name of an individual, and the system will auto-suggest matching users from the Workfront database. This is ideal for scenarios where you need to assign a specific role, like a Creative Manager, from a list of existing users.
Object type - User: By using the User object type, the field will link directly to Workfront's user directory, ensuring that the selection is limited to valid, active resources in the system.
This combination of field and object type is the most efficient for assigning roles based on existing users, as it prevents errors and ensures data consistency by utilizing Workfront's internal user directory.
Options B and C are not suitable because a calculated field is not required, and checkboxes do not allow selection from a list of user names.
For further reference, consult the Custom Fields and Typeahead Fields sections in Workfront's documentation, which outline how to configure these fields to enable user selection from the organization's resource pool.
質問 # 44
On the dispatcher, the consultant is reviewing what HTTP request methods to allow to /bin/workfront-tools. The following methods are available: GET, HEAD, POST, PUT, and DELETE.
Which requests should be allowed?
- A. DELETE POST and GET
- B. HEAD. PUT. and DELETE
- C. GET, POST, and PUT
正解：C
質問 # 45
A user wants to create watermarked renditions of only some of the assets in AEM Assets. Which workflow strategy should be used to achieve this goal?
- A. Modify the DAM update Asset workflow model to include the Add Watermark process.
- B. Create a new workflow model that includes the Add Watermark process, and run this workflow on the desired assets.
- C. implement a new workflow process to generate a watermarked rendition of an asset. Modify the DAM Update Asset workflow model to include this workflow process.
正解：B
解説：
To create watermarked renditions for only some of the assets in AEM, the best approach is to create a new workflow model that includes the Add Watermark process. This new workflow can be selectively applied to specific assets as needed, rather than modifying the global DAM Update Asset workflow which would affect all assets.
Selective application: By creating a custom workflow model, users can choose which assets will go through the watermarking process, providing more control and preventing unnecessary watermarking of all assets.
Option B and C suggest modifying the existing DAM Update Asset workflow, which could result in watermarking all assets, not just the desired ones, and is not flexible for specific asset selection.
Refer to AEM's workflow documentation for more information on creating custom workflows and adding watermark processes.
質問 # 46
......
最新100%合格率保証付きの素晴らしいAD0-E906試験問題PDF：https://jp.fast2test.com/AD0-E906-premium-file.html