[2024年10月09日]COBIT-Design-and-Implementationテスト準備できるトレーニング練習テスト試験問題
試験問題解答ブレーン問題集でCOBIT-Design-and-Implementation試験問題集PDFを使おう
ISACA COBIT-Design-and-Implementation 認定試験の出題範囲：
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
| トピック 5 |
|
| トピック 6 |
|
質問 # 20
Which of the following is the BEST approach to resolve competing priorities for the design of a governance system?
- A. Base the design on initiatives that will yield the most immediate benefit for the enterprise.
- B. Include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design.
- C. Defer to risk and assurance management to determine priorities.
- D. Utilize generic, pre-programmed computations to generate quantitative priorities for governance objectives.
正解：B
解説：
The best approach to resolving competing priorities for the design of a governance system is to include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design. This approach ensures that diverse perspectives are considered and that priorities are aligned with the overall strategic goals of the enterprise.
References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, MEA04 (Managed Stakeholder Engagement):This objective emphasizes the importance of engaging stakeholders to ensure that their needs and priorities are addressed.
* COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter discusses the value of stakeholder involvement in the governance design process to achieve consensus and align priorities.
Involving key stakeholders in the discussion helps to balance different priorities and ensures that the governance system design reflects a broad range of insights and objectives.
質問 # 21
Which of the following is a KEY input to be considered when defining drivers for a COBIT implementation?
- A. Business case outline
- B. IT process documentation
- C. Stakeholder map
- D. Enterprise policies
正解：C
解説：
A key input to be considered when defining drivers for a COBIT implementation is the stakeholder map.
Understanding the stakeholders involved and their expectations is crucial for identifying the drivers that will shape the governance system.
References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
* COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter emphasizes the importance of stakeholder identification and mapping in understanding their needs and expectations, which in turn define the drivers for the COBIT implementation.
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, MEA04 (Managed Stakeholder Engagement):This objective highlights the role of stakeholder engagement in shaping governance and management priorities.
The stakeholder map provides a clear view of who the stakeholders are and what their interests and expectations are, ensuring that the drivers for the COBIT implementation are aligned with the needs of the enterprise.
質問 # 22
When considering the IT implementation methods design factor, and the design factor value is agile, which of the following should be a management objective priority?
- A. Managed data (AP014)
- B. Managed enterprise architecture
- C. Managed risk
- D. Managed IT changes
正解：D
解説：
When the IT implementation methods design factor value is agile, the management objective priority should be "Managed IT changes." Agile methodologies involve frequent changes and iterations, making effective change management crucial for success.
Agile methodologies emphasize flexibility, iterative development, and rapid response to change. As a result, managing IT changes becomes a priority to ensure that changes are systematically controlled, risks are mitigated, and alignment with business goals is maintained.
COBIT 2019 Framework References:
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, BAI06 Managed IT Changes:This objective focuses on managing all IT changes in a controlled manner, ensuring minimal disruption and alignment with business goals.
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 3:Discusses the importance of aligning management objectives with specific design factors, such as IT implementation methods like Agile.
By prioritizing "Managed IT changes," the enterprise can ensure that its agile implementation remains effective and aligned with overall governance objectives.
質問 # 23
During CSF life cycle action plan review, which of the following tasks is associated with realizing benefits?
- A. Developing business cases indicating success factors
- B. Monitoring performance against objectives
- C. Documenting risk issues and remediation plans
正解：B
解説：
During the Critical Success Factor (CSF) life cycle action plan review, the task associated with realizing benefits is "Monitoring performance against objectives." This task ensures that the expected benefits of the IT initiatives are being achieved by continuously assessing performance and making necessary adjustments.
Monitoring performance against objectives involves tracking the progress of IT initiatives to ensure they meet their goals and deliver the expected benefits. This includes using performance metrics, key performance indicators (KPIs), and regular reviews to evaluate whether the initiatives are on track and delivering value.
COBIT 2019 Framework References:
* COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 7:Emphasizes the importance of monitoring and measuring performance to ensure that benefits are realized and objectives are met.
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4:Highlights the role of performance monitoring in managing and achieving IT governance and management objectives.
By monitoring performance against objectives, enterprises can ensure that their IT initiatives are successful and provide the intended benefits, making it a critical task in the CSF life cycle action plan review.
質問 # 24
When is it MOST important for an enterprise to apply the full governance design workflow and carefully consider all design factors?
- A. When the enterprise must meet complex regulatory requirements for which the enterprise is not currently in compliance
- B. When the enterprise requires a broad, holistic, and comprehensive view of its governance system
- C. When key stakeholders cannot agree on governance objectives, strategy, and priorities
- D. When the enterprise needs to focus on one key initiative requiring a major investment
正解：B
解説：
Applying the full governance design workflow and carefully considering all design factors is most important when an enterprise requires a broad, holistic, and comprehensive view of its governance system. This scenario is where the entire spectrum of the governance framework needs to be analyzed and tailored to ensure it meets the enterprise's overall strategic goals and operational needs.
References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:This chapter elaborates on how design factors influence the creation of a tailored governance system that is comprehensive and aligns with the enterprise's unique context.
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4:This chapter discusses the importance of a holistic approach in establishing governance and the necessity of considering all design factors to create a system that encompasses all aspects of enterprise IT and business objectives.
* COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter provides steps for implementing a comprehensive governance system, emphasizing the importance of a full governance design workflow to achieve a thorough and effective governance structure.
By following the full governance design workflow, enterprises can ensure that their governance framework is not only comprehensive but also customized to address specific needs, thereby improving alignment, efficiency, and compliance across the organization.
質問 # 25
Which of the following should be used when translating design factor values into governance and management priorities?
- A. Pareto analysis
- B. Weighted calculation
- C. Matrix calculation
- D. Weighted average
正解：B
解説：
When translating design factor values into governance and management priorities, a weighted calculation should be used. This method allows for the consideration of various factors according to their relative importance and impact on the governance system.
References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4:This chapter explains the process of translating design factor values into actionable governance and management priorities, emphasizing the use of weighted calculations to reflect the importance of different design factors.
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4:This chapter highlights how weighted calculations can help prioritize governance and management activities based on the enterprise's specific context and needs.
Using weighted calculations ensures a balanced and proportionate approach to prioritizing governance and management objectives, leading to a more effective and tailored governance system.
質問 # 26
Which of the following is an important component for an enterprise strategy archetype of cost leadership as defined by COBIT 2019?
- A. Support for the portfolio management role with an investment office
- B. Enterprise architect
- C. Organizational structures
- D. Skills and competencies
正解：A
解説：
For an enterprise strategy archetype of cost leadership as defined by COBIT 2019, an important component is the support for the portfolio management role with an investment office. This ensures that investments are managed efficiently, aligning with the cost leadership strategy to maximize value while minimizing costs.
References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, EDM02 (Ensure Benefits Delivery):This objective highlights the importance of managing investments effectively to achieve cost leadership.
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter discusses the need for strong portfolio management and investment oversight to support cost leadership strategies.
An investment office provides the structure and oversight necessary to ensure that resources are allocated efficiently, supporting the enterprise's goal of maintaining a competitive cost advantage.
質問 # 27
Which of the following needs to be resolved when finalizing the initial governance design?
- A. Conflicting inputs and priorities
- B. Budgeted versus actual resources
- C. Objectives exceeding enterprise appetite
- D. Misaligned enterprise and IT goals
正解：A
解説：
The initial governance design process involves gathering inputs from various stakeholders, including business units, IT, and external partners. These inputs can sometimes conflict, and it is crucial to resolve these conflicts to create a unified governance system that supports enterprise objectives.
Key Steps:
* Stakeholder Alignment:Ensuring that all stakeholders are on the same page regarding priorities and objectives.
* Conflict Resolution:Addressing and resolving any discrepancies or conflicts in inputs to ensure a consistent and aligned governance system.
* Prioritization:Establishing clear priorities to guide decision-making and resource allocation.
COBIT 2019 Framework References:
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4:Discusses the importance of resolving conflicting inputs and establishing a cohesive governance framework that aligns with enterprise priorities.
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives:Emphasizes the need for alignment between IT and enterprise goals, requiring the resolution of any conflicting priorities.
Resolving conflicting inputs and priorities ensures that the governance system is well-aligned and effective in achieving enterprise goals.
質問 # 28
I&T-related issues, also called pain points:
- A. are restricted to internally generated issues.
- B. could be considered risks that have not yet materialized.
- C. are generally reported and tracked separately from risk management processes.
- D. could be considered risks that have materialized.
正解：D
解説：
I&T-related issues, also called pain points, could be considered risks that have materialized. These issues represent current challenges and problems that the enterprise is facing, indicating that certain risks have already impacted the organization.
References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:This chapter explains that I&T-related issues or pain points are current problems that the enterprise needs to address, indicating that these risks have already materialized.
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO12 (Managed Risk):This objective emphasizes the importance of identifying and managing risks, including those that have already impacted the organization.
By recognizing that I&T-related issues are materialized risks, enterprises can focus on mitigating these issues and preventing future occurrences, ensuring better risk management and governance.
質問 # 29
While tailoring design factors, which of the following roles of IT demonstrates the HIGHEST level of enterprise dependency on I&T?
- A. Factory
- B. Support
- C. Turnaround
- D. Strategic
正解：D
解説：
In COBIT 2019, the role of IT that demonstrates the highest level of enterprise dependency on Information and Technology (I&T) isStrategic. This role indicates that IT is not only integral to the business but is also a driver of innovation and strategic initiatives.
References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter explains the various roles of IT within an enterprise. The strategic role is where IT is pivotal for business transformation, competitive advantage, and achieving strategic business goals.
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4:This chapter highlights the impact of the strategic role of IT on the governance system, emphasizing the high dependency on IT for achieving business objectives.
Enterprises with IT in a strategic role rely heavily on IT to drive business strategies, innovate, and gain a competitive edge, making it the highest level of dependency on I&T.
質問 # 30
In which of the following phases should long-term targets be adjusted based on experience?
- A. What needs to be done?
- B. Did we get there?
- C. How do we get there?
- D. Where are we now?
正解：B
解説：
In the COBIT 2019 implementation lifecycle, the phase where long-term targets should be adjusted based on experience is the evaluation phase, known as "Did we get there?". This phase involves assessing the results of the implemented governance and management practices to determine if the objectives have been met and to identify areas for improvement.
Detailed Explanation with References:
* How do we get there? (Option A):
* This phase focuses on developing and executing the plan to achieve the governance objectives. It involves identifying the steps, resources, and timeline needed to reach the desired state. While important for planning, this phase is more about action and implementation rather than evaluation and adjustment of long-term targets.
* Where are we now? (Option B):
* This phase involves assessing the current state of the governance system, identifying gaps, and understanding the baseline. It provides the foundational information needed to plan improvements but does not involve adjusting long-term targets.
* What needs to be done? (Option C):
* This phase is concerned with identifying the specific actions and initiatives required to address the gaps and achieve the governance objectives. It involves planning and prioritizing activities but not the evaluation and adjustment of long-term targets based on experience.
* Did we get there? (Option D):
* In this phase, the enterprise evaluates the outcomes of the implemented governance system against the set objectives and targets. It involves assessing whether the desired goals were achieved and analyzing the effectiveness of the governance practices. Based on this evaluation, the organization can adjust long-term targets to better align with practical experience, new insights, and evolving business needs. This phase is critical for continuous improvement and ensuring that the governance system remains relevant and effective over time.
* According to the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, this phase includes reviewing performance metrics, stakeholder feedback, and lessons learned from the implementation process. These insights are then used to refine and adjust long-term targets to improve future performance and outcomes.
Conclusion:The correct answer isD. Did we get there?. This phase involves evaluating the results of the governance implementation, learning from the experience, and making necessary adjustments to long-term targets to ensure continuous improvement and alignment with the enterprise's goals.
References:
* ISACA. COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: Implementing and Optimizing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.
* ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
質問 # 31
Who is responsible for monitoring the achievement of the overall EGIT implementation program plan results, including the achievement of goals and realization of benefits?
- A. IT managers
- B. IT process owners
- C. Program steering committee
- D. ICIO
正解：C
解説：
The program steering committee is responsible for monitoring the achievement of the overall EGIT (Enterprise Governance of Information and Technology) implementation program plan results, including the achievement of goals and realization of benefits.
The program steering committee provides oversight and governance for the EGIT implementation program.
This committee ensures that the program is aligned with strategic objectives, monitors progress, and ensures that the desired benefits are realized. They are accountable for the overall success of the implementation.
COBIT 2019 Framework References:
* COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 7:Details the roles and responsibilities of the program steering committee in overseeing the implementation of the governance system.
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4:Emphasizes the importance of having a steering committee to provide strategic direction and oversight for the implementation program.
By having the program steering committee monitor the achievement of the EGIT program plan, the enterprise ensures that there is accountability and alignment with business goals.
質問 # 32
After a bank experienced cyber attacks that severely impacted operations and raised questions from regulators, the board mandated the newly hired CIO to implement global best practices to mitigate thisrisk. The CIO is using COBIT 2019 to tailor the governance system and has identified high threat landscape as a critical design factor. Which of the following should the CIO identify NEXT?
- A. Security-related processes
- B. Technology personnel
- C. Risk management practices
- D. IT security solutions
正解：A
解説：
After identifying a high threat landscape as a critical design factor, the CIO should next identify security-related processes. This step ensures that the governance system includes robust processes to manage and mitigate security risks.
In a high-threat landscape, focusing on security-related processes is essential to protect the enterprise's information assets and mitigate potential risks. These processes include incident management, vulnerability management, and access control, among others.
COBIT 2019 Framework References:
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO13 Managed Security:
This objective
質問 # 33
The PRIMARY function of COBIT Implementation Phase 7: How Do We Keep the Momentum Going is to provide an opportunity for which of the following?
- A. Documenting improvements in a prioritized action plan
- B. Ensuring frequent stakeholder communication
- C. Closing the loop for communication workflow
正解：B
解説：
The primary function of COBIT Implementation Phase 7: "How Do We Keep the Momentum Going?" is to ensure frequent stakeholder communication. This phase focuses on maintaining engagement and support from stakeholders to sustain the momentum of the governance initiatives.
Ensuring frequent stakeholder communication is essential for maintaining momentum in governance initiatives. This involves regular updates, feedback sessions, and transparent communication to keep stakeholders informed and involved in the ongoing process. It helps to address any concerns, align expectations, and ensure continuous support for the initiatives.
COBIT 2019 Framework References:
* COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 8:Discusses the importance of continuous communication with stakeholders to keep the momentum going and maintain support for governance initiatives.
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 5:Highlights the need for frequent and effective communication to ensure that stakeholders remain engaged and supportive throughout the implementation process.
By ensuring frequent stakeholder communication, enterprises can sustain the momentum of their governance initiatives, making it the primary function of COBIT Implementation Phase 7
質問 # 34
Which function within the IT corporate structure is responsible for classifying information using an agreed-upon classification scheme for a new data collection system?
- A. Enterprise architecture
- B. Information security
- C. Information privacy
- D. .IT governance
正解：B
解説：
The function within the IT corporate structure responsible for classifying information using an agreed-upon classification scheme for a new data collection system is the Information Security function. Information security ensures that data is properly classified to protect it according to its sensitivity and criticality.
References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO13 (Managed Security):
This objective outlines the responsibilities of the information security function, which includes defining and implementing information classification schemes.
* COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter details how information security policies and practices should be established, including the classification of information assets.
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Deliver, Service and Support (DSS05, Managed Security Services):This objective highlights the role of information security in managing security services, including data classification and protection measures.
By classifying information, the information security function ensures that data is adequately protected against unauthorized access and breaches, adhering to compliance requirements and supporting the overall security posture of the enterprise.
質問 # 35
An enterprise is considering threat landscape as a design factor for its governance system. Which of the following would be a reason to classify the threat landscape as high?
- A. IT trends that could be used in favor of the enterprise
- B. Potential new competitors entering the market
- C. Service delivery problems byIT outsourcers
- D. Geopolitical situations affecting the enterprise
正解：D
解説：
An enterprise would classify the threat landscape as high if geopolitical situations are affecting the enterprise.
Geopolitical factors can introduce significant risks, such as instability, regulatory changes, or economic sanctions, which can have a profound impact on the enterprise's operations and strategic goals.
In COBIT 2019, the threat landscape design factor considers various external threats that could impact the enterprise. Geopolitical situations are a significant external factor that can elevate the threat landscape due to potential disruptions and increased risks.
COBIT 2019 Framework References:
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:Discusses the importance of assessing external threats, including geopolitical situations, when evaluating the threat landscape.
* COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 7:Emphasizes the need to consider external factors such as geopolitical risks in the governance system design.
Classifying the threat landscape as high due to geopolitical situations ensures that the enterprise proactively addresses these risks and implements appropriate governance and risk management strategies to mitigate potential impacts.
質問 # 36
What group is PRIMARILY responsible for setting the overall direction for IT governance implementation?
- A. Key stakeholders
- B. Business owners
- C. IT management
- D. Enterprise executives
正解：D
解説：
The group primarily responsible for setting the overall direction for IT governance implementation is the enterprise executives. Their role is crucial in aligning IT governance with the strategic goals and vision of the organization.
References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, EDM01 (Ensure Governance Framework Setting and Maintenance):This objective discusses the responsibilities of enterprise executives in setting the governance framework's direction.
* COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter highlights the role of senior leadership in driving the implementation of IT governance.
Enterprise executives provide the strategic direction and support necessary to ensure that IT governance aligns with the enterprise's overall mission and objectives.
質問 # 37
Which of the following should be a KEY consideration for an enterprise when refining the scope of the governance system in the third stage of the Governance System Design Workflow?
- A. Enterprise strategy
- B. The risk profile
- C. Compliance requirements
- D. Current l&T-related risks
正解：A
解説：
In the third stage of the Governance System Design Workflow, refining the scope of the governance system involves aligning it closely with the overall strategic direction and objectives of the enterprise. COBIT 2019 emphasizes that the governance system should support the enterprise's strategy to ensure that I&T-related activities contribute effectively to achieving business goals.
Key considerations for refining the scope include:
* Enterprise Strategy (Option A): The primary consideration is ensuring that the governance system aligns with and supports the enterprise strategy. This involves understanding the strategic objectives,
* goals, and priorities of the organization and ensuring that the governance system is designed to help achieve these strategic aims. This alignment ensures that IT governance is not just a compliance exercise but a strategic enabler for business success.
* Current I&T-Related Risks (Option B): While important, this factor is more about addressing immediate operational concerns and is typically considered earlier in the process to identify and mitigate significant risks.
* The Risk Profile (Option C): Understanding the overall risk profile and risk appetite of the enterprise is crucial for shaping the governance system but is not the primary focus in the third stage. This aspect is usually addressed in earlier stages to ensure that the governance framework adequately covers risk management.
* Compliance Requirements (Option D): Ensuring compliance is always a critical consideration, but like risk management, it is typically addressed earlier in the designprocess. Compliance requirements should be integrated into the governance framework but are not the key driver at the refining stage.
Thus, the correct answer isA. Enterprise strategy. By focusing on the enterprise strategy during the third stage of the Governance System Design Workflow, the governance system can be refined to support strategic initiatives, thereby ensuring that IT governance contributes directly to achieving business goals.
References:
* ISACA. COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution.
ISACA.
* ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
質問 # 38
......
無料ダウンロードISACA COBIT-Design-and-Implementationリアルな試験問題で合格しよう：https://jp.fast2test.com/COBIT-Design-and-Implementation-premium-file.html
COBIT-Design-and-Implementation試験問題集、COBIT-Design-and-Implementation練習テスト問題：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GqAW8Fi-Dm1AjuKj1GYfYUk061zGo96o