[2023年12月]更新のAdobe AD0-E556試験基本問題には解答が付きます
2023年最新の実際に出るAdobe AD0-E556試験問題集と解答
質問 # 14
Refer to the case study
UNICORN FINTECH COMPANY PROFILE
Unicorn Fintech is a mobile-only financial-servicesstartup created by a consortium of consumer banks to resell savings, checking, loan, transfer/remittance, and other services from a secure smartphone app. The company is venture-funded, and plans to reach profitability before a planned IPO in two years.
Business issues and requirements
Marketing is responsible for acquiring new customers 0 through online, television advertising, and email campaigns, and for cross-selling new services to customers through IM, email, and in-app campaigns.
Evaluating the success of these campaigns has been a persistent problem: although the company can track revenue by product line, it can't attribute those revenues to campaigns: for example, did a new loan come from onboarding a new customer, or by cross-selling a savings-account customer? Marketing currently uses crude, manual tools and guesswork to evaluate the quality and lifespan of new leads, and even the deliverability of emails in its external campaigns. As a result, the department can't allocate spending to the most productive campaigns, or decide how much different touchpoints in multi-stage campaigns contribute to revenue. Operational processes to connect lead data to CRM and other databases are entirely manual.
Staffing and leadership
Unicorn has fewer than 200 employees, and roles aren't always defined in traditional ways. Since customer acquisition and cross-selling are primarily through electronic channels, Marketing and IT roles especially often overlap. The traditional Sales role falls entirely to Marketing, and IT is responsible for the Salesforce CRM system, Google Analytics, and a handful of third-party integrations. The CMO and CIO work closely together on most initiatives, and budgets are typically project-driven rather than fixedannually. Individual contributors to Marketing campaigns include the Marketing Operations Manager, responsible for lead scoring and analytics. Key IT contacts include the CRM Administrator and Web Developer. Incidental contributors are the Corporate Attorney, who signs off on opt-in/out and DMARC policies.
Revenue sources
Unicorn earns commissions on financial services delivered by the banking consortium through its apps, including fixed finders' fees for what the company calls "skips"-customers who initially engage with Unicorn, but then "skip" to receive services directly from a consortium bank. Unicorn needs to attribute revenue from these customers to its own campaigns; currently, it's impossible to attribute ROI to individual campaigns, or provide documentation to claim commissions on "skips." Current and aspirational marketing technology Current Marketing technology consists of Marketable,an open-source lead management solution supported by a set of spreadsheets and scripts developed in-house. Marketable offers lead tracking and source attribution, but not multi-touch source attribution. Unicorn Fintech Marketing has difficulty linking the different stages of customer campaign journeys, and relies on scripts to translate Marketable's "sales alerts" into next steps it could use in multi-touch campaigns. IT has worked out scripts to input Marketable qualified leads into Salesforce, but the system is brittle and often requires manual intervention.
Current campaign management processes
A typical email campaign:
* Addresses a purchased (for customer acquisition) or0 in-house (for cross-sell) list. Purchased lists range from
300,000 to 1.5 million addresses
* Is sent from multiple data centers in the US and Canada
* Includes an "unsubscribe" opt-out below the message
* Is static; there are no formula fields
* Uses no deliverability authentication, nor integration 0 with any email management platform.
All campaigns to date direct respondents to a single 0 landing page with the company's "all markets" message.
More sophisticated targeting is a high priority.
Current lead management and attribution
Unicorn's lead-management process follows
Marketable's "out of the box" defaults: lead evaluation levels 1 through 3, lifecycle stages "unqualified" and
"qualified." The qualification processes are manual, and highly subjective: Marketing staff classify leads according to prospect email responses, including free-form comments. "Sales" followup is by email forms prompting higher levels of engagement. The company intends to phase out Marketable and replace spreadsheets and scripts with native features of whatever solution set it adopts.
Attribution processes are binary: response to a campaign email or web visit is rated a success if it results in a sale: there is no success rating assigned to TV ads that result in web visits, for example. Cost are not allocated to individual campaigns.
The Marketing department plans to expand outreach to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, in-house and third-party financial blogs), and wants to make sure it can assess the ROI of these channels, and the overall social media program.
Current governance processes
Currently, the Marketing department assigns content development and campaign management duties to team members on a campaign-by-campaign basis. All team members (and IT) have access to all assets and tools, which sometimes leads to duplication and conflicts. The CMO realizes that a more specialization will be necessary to support the social media campaigns, but hasn't decided on the optimal organizational model.
Input of qualified leads from Marketable into
Salesforce is by manual cut-and-paste, assisted by scripts; inconsistency of input practices across Marketing team members is a known problem; individual members have their own "go-to" fields: where one member might check "TV ad" as Lead Source, another would put that in the comments field.
CMO
The CMO's most important concerns are:
* The current solution has too many manual steps to scale with anticipated growth
* Without more sophisticated attribution, the company will overinvest in less productive campaigns, and underinvest in better ones
* In general, analytics integrations are manual, slow, and unreliable
* The current system completely misses "skips"-customers switching from the Unicorn app to consortium banks-an important source of revenue
* Documenting the value of Unicorn's Marketing processes is essential to the success of the planned IPO, and millions of dollars in stock valuation hangs in the balance.
CIO
The CIO is concerned primarily with:
* The amount of time his team spends patching up Marketing campaigns and CRM data transfers, at the expense of other, critical initiatives
* Quality and reliability of the Analytics information his team provides to Marketing MARKETING STAFF Marketing Operations staff concerns:
* Campaigns require so much work that they can't run as many of them as they need to
* Multi-touch cross-selling campaigns (for example, savings accounts to loans) with excellent margins, but no way to know which campaign touches perform best
* Getting swamped with manual record-keeping; for example, spreadsheet mistakes take hours to find and fix
* Poor integration with third-party tools for preparing, sending, and evaluating campaign materials, for Example.
o Webhook not firing,
o Reaching API limit
o Synchronization errors with third-party tools and Salesforce
* Inadequate number of lead stages and qualification levels, making it difficult to evaluate lead value, especially in multi-touch campaigns Despite the absence of an external Sales team, Marketing Operations would like to improve the granularity of their lead tracking, including both lifecycle stages and quality levels, with "no score" and negative levels.
Unicorn has been having an issue with data quality coming from their Adobe Marketo Engage instance. An audit finds that a key issue is that Marketers and IT members lacked knowledge in best practice processes for the following tasks:
* Importing data to Marketo Engage or CRM in incorrect format or with old information
* Setting up forms to comply with Data Standardization (such as String Country fields to fill out)
* Importing large purchased lists without any minimal validation
Unicorn agrees with the auditor's recommendations to roll out enablement as part of a way to solve the problems.
Which two steps should be a part of this enablement? (Choose two.)
- A. Buy lists from a third-party data provider that are GDPR compliant with no country values
- B. Remove access to users who are the 'worst offenders' until they have successfully passed the Marketo Certified Associate Exam
- C. Align IT and Marketing Ops teams on what level of responsibility each team should have on data management in Marketo Engage
- D. Set up a Roles and Permissions workshop with the CMO and CIO to capture and enforce the right level of access for level of Marketo Engage usage
- E. Set up training sessions that covers List Import and Form best practices for both day-to-day users and Marketo Engage 'Power Users'
正解：C、E
解説：
Explanation
Setting up training sessions that covers List Import and Form best practices for both day-to-day users and Marketo Engage 'Power Users' is a good step to be part of the enablement, as it would help the users to learn how to avoid common data quality issues and follow the best practices for importing data and creating forms.
Aligning IT and Marketing Ops teams on what level of responsibility each team should have on data management in Marketo Engage is another good step to be part of the enablement, as it would help to clarify the roles and expectations of each team and ensure a consistent and collaborative approach to data quality.
Setting up a Roles and Permissions workshop with the CMO and CIO to capture and enforce the right level of access for level of Marketo Engage usage is not a bad step, but it is not directly related to the data quality issues or the enablement of the users. Removing access to users who are the 'worst offenders' until they have successfully passed the Marketo Certified Associate Exam is not a good step, as it would be punitive and disruptive to the users' work. Buying lists from a third-party data provider that are GDPR compliant with no country values is not a good step, as it would not solve the data quality issues or improve the users' knowledge of best practices.
質問 # 15
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect is working for Too Big to Fail Co., an enterprise company that has an
8-year-old Marketo Engage instance (A). Too Big to Fail Co. recently purchased start up Treat Snack LTD, which has 100 employees and its own Marketo Engage instance (B). The Architect needs to merge the two instances and maintain business continuity. No additional budget, funding, or resources are available for the merger and migration.
The Architect needs to determine the most important actions to take for the minimum viable solution to meet the business needs. The two instances need to be merged in 3 months.
Which actions should the Architect take?
- A. * Spin up a new instance (C)
* Dedupe leads across both instances (A and B) and import into the new instance (C)
* Audit highest-performing assets and key critical campaigns in both instances
* Rebuild in the new instance (C) - B. * Dedupe instance (A) database and import the leads into instance (B)
* Determine the highest-performing assets and rebuild the campaigns relevant to those assets
* Audit the instance for critical business functions
* Rebuild in instance (B) - C. * Dedupe the instance (B) database and import the leads into instance (A)
* Determine the highest-performing assets and rebuild the campaigns relevant to those assets
* Audit the instance for critical business functions
* Rebuild in instance (A)
正解：C
解説：
Explanation
The most important actions to take for the minimum viable solution are to dedupe the instance (B) database and import the leads into instance (A), determine the highest-performing assets and rebuild the campaigns relevant to those assets, audit the instance for critical business functions, and rebuild in instance (A). This is because instance (A) is older and likely has more data, assets, and integrations than instance (B), and it would be easier and faster to migrate the smaller instance into the larger one. Deduping the leads and determining the highest-performing assets are essential steps to avoid data quality issues and maintain campaign performance.
Auditing the instance for critical business functions and rebuilding them in instance (A) are necessary steps to ensure business continuity and alignment. The other options are not as feasible or efficient as this one, because they involve creating a new instance or migrating the larger instance into the smaller one, which would require more time, resources, and complexity.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Instance+Migration+Guide
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Best+Practices%3A+Data+Management
質問 # 16
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect is integrating a Marketo Engage instance for a nonprofit client with two different third-party platforms. The requirements are outlined below:
Scenario 1: Automatically clone existing default programs on Marketo, build the email using the RSS feed of blog section, and schedule the email on every Thursday.
Scenario 2: Before deleting any record on Marketo, push the data to "Donor System".
How should the Marketo Engage Architect approach the platform integration?
- A. Scenario 1 - Use REST API and Scenario 2 - Use Webhook
- B. Scenario 1 - Use Webhook and Scenario 2 - Use REST API
- C. Scenario 1 - Use JavaScript API and Scenario 2 - Use REST API
- D. Scenario 1 - Use Email Scripting and Scenario 2 - Use REST API
正解：D
解説：
Explanation
The way that the Marketo Engage Architect should approach the platform integration is to use Email Scripting for scenario 1 and REST API for scenario 2. These methods will help the Architect to automate and optimize the processes of cloning existing default programs, building emails using RSS feed, scheduling emails, deleting records on Marketo, and pushing data to Donor System. Using Email Scripting for scenario 1 will allow the Architect to dynamically generate email content based on the RSS feed of blog section, instead of manually creating email assets. Using REST API for scenario 2 will allow the Architect to programmatically delete records on Marketo and push data to Donor System, instead of relying on manual or offline methods.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Email+Scripting
https://developers.marketo.com/rest-api/
質問 # 17
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect notices that the smart campaigns run slowly. The Campaign Queue in Marketing Activities is full of backlog campaigns. The alerts fire with a delay. All alert smart campaignsare triggered based on the first step of Change Data Value. All Batch campaigns use the Advanced Wait Properties at the first step to run the campaign every Monday at 8:00 PM PT.
Which steps should the Architect perform to scale the campaign execution?
- A. For campaigns sending alerts, add Sync to SFDC step to first. For batch campaigns, use normal Wait instead of Advanced Wait Properties.
- B. For campaigns sending alerts, move the Send Alert step to first. For batch campaigns, use batch campaign scheduler instead of Advanced Wait Properties.
- C. For campaigns sending alerts, move the Send Alert step to first. For batch campaigns, make sure that the wait time is less than 10 minutes.
正解：B
解説：
Explanation
The steps that the Architect should perform to scale the campaign execution are to move the Send Alert step to first for campaigns sending alerts, and to use batch campaign scheduler instead of Advanced Wait Properties for batch campaigns. These steps will help the Architect to improve the speed and efficiency of the smart campaigns, as well as reduce the backlog in the campaign queue. Moving the Send Alert step to first will ensure that alerts are sent immediately without waiting for other flow steps or triggers, which can cause delays or errors. Using batch campaign scheduler instead of Advanced Wait Properties will allow the Architect to schedule batch campaigns at a specific date and time, instead of using a wait step that can clog up the queue or run at suboptimal times.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Smart+Campaigns+Overview
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Schedule+a+Batch+Campaign
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Wait+Flow+Action
質問 # 18
Refer to the case study.
UNICORN FINTECH COMPANY PROFILE
Unicorn Fintech is a mobile-only financial-servicesstartup created by a consortium of consumer banks to resell savings, checking, loan, transfer/remittance, and other services from a secure smartphone app. The company is venture-funded, and plans to reach profitability before a planned IPO in two years.
Business issues and requirements
Marketing is responsible for acquiring new customers 0 through online, television advertising, and email campaigns, and for cross-selling new services to customers through IM, email, and in-app campaigns.
Evaluating the success of these campaigns has been a persistent problem: although the company can track revenue by product line, it can't attribute those revenues to campaigns: for example, did a new loan come from onboarding a new customer, or by cross-selling a savings-account customer? Marketing currently uses crude, manual tools and guesswork to evaluate the quality and lifespan of new leads, and even the deliverability of emails in its external campaigns. As a result, the department can't allocate spending to the most productive campaigns, or decide how much different touchpoints in multi-stage campaignscontribute to revenue. Operational processes to connect lead data to CRM and other databases are entirely manual.
Staffing and leadership
Unicorn has fewer than 200 employees, and roles aren't always defined in traditional ways. Since customer acquisition and cross-selling are primarily through electronic channels, Marketing and IT roles especially often overlap. The traditional Sales role falls entirely to Marketing, and IT is responsible for the Salesforce CRM system, Google Analytics, and a handful of third-party integrations. The CMO and CIO work closely together on most initiatives, and budgets are typically project-driven rather than fixed annually. Individual contributors to Marketing campaigns include the Marketing Operations Manager, responsible for lead scoring and analytics. Key IT contacts include the CRM Administrator and Web Developer. Incidental contributors are the Corporate Attorney, who signs off on opt-in/out and DMARC policies.
Revenue sources
Unicorn earns commissions on financial services delivered by the banking consortium through its apps, including fixed finders' fees for what the company calls "skips"-customers who initially engage with Unicorn, but then "skip" to receive services directly from a consortium bank. Unicorn needs to attribute revenue from these customers to its own campaigns; currently, it's impossible to attribute ROI to individual campaigns, or provide documentation to claim commissions on "skips." Current and aspirational marketing technology Current Marketing technology consists of Marketable,an open-source lead management solution supported by a set of spreadsheets and scripts developed in-house. Marketable offers lead tracking and source attribution, but not multi-touch source attribution. Unicorn Fintech Marketing has difficulty linking the different stages of customer campaign journeys, and relies on scripts to translate Marketable's "sales alerts" into next steps it could use in multi-touch campaigns. IT has worked out scripts to input Marketable qualified leads into Salesforce, but the system is brittle and often requires manual intervention.
Current campaign management processes
A typical email campaign:
* Addresses a purchased (for customer acquisition) or0 in-house (for cross-sell) list. Purchased lists range from
300,000 to 1.5 million addresses
* Is sent from multiple data centers in the US and Canada
* Includes an "unsubscribe" opt-out below the message
* Is static; there are no formula fields
* Uses no deliverability authentication, nor integration 0 with any email management platform.
All campaigns to date direct respondents to a single 0 landing page with the company's "all markets" message.
More sophisticated targeting is a high priority.
Current lead management and attribution
Unicorn's lead-management process follows
Marketable's "out of the box" defaults: lead evaluation levels 1 through 3, lifecycle stages "unqualified" and
"qualified." The qualification processes are manual, and highly subjective: Marketing staff classify leads according to prospect email responses, including free-form comments. "Sales" followup is by email forms prompting higher levels of engagement. The company intends to phase out Marketable and replace spreadsheets and scripts with native features of whatever solution set it adopts.
Attribution processes are binary: response to a campaign email or web visit is rated a success if it results in a sale: there is no success rating assigned to TV ads that result in web visits, for example. Cost are not allocated to individual campaigns.
The Marketing department plans to expand outreach to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, in-house and third-party financial blogs), and wants to make sure it can assess the ROI of these channels, and the overall social media program.
Current governance processes
Currently, the Marketing department assigns content development and campaign management duties to team members on a campaign-by-campaign basis. All team members (and IT) have access to all assets and tools, which sometimes leads to duplication and conflicts. The CMO realizes that a more specialization will be necessary to support the social media campaigns, but hasn't decided on the optimal organizational model.
Input of qualified leads from Marketable into
Salesforce is by manual cut-and-paste, assisted by scripts; inconsistency of input practices across Marketing team members is a known problem; individual members have their own "go-to" fields: where one member might check "TV ad" as Lead Source, another would put that in the comments field.
CMO
The CMO's most important concerns are:
* The current solution has too many manual steps to scale with anticipated growth
* Without more sophisticated attribution, the company will overinvest in less productive campaigns, and underinvest in better ones
* In general, analytics integrations are manual, slow, and unreliable
* The current system completely misses "skips"-customers switching from the Unicorn app to consortium banks-an important source of revenue
* Documenting the value of Unicorn's Marketing processes is essential to the success of the planned IPO, and millions of dollars in stock valuation hangs in the balance.
CIO
The CIO is concerned primarily with:
* The amount of time his team spends patching up Marketing campaigns and CRM data transfers, at the expense of other, critical initiatives
* Quality and reliability of the Analytics information his team provides to Marketing MARKETING STAFF Marketing Operations staff concerns:
* Campaigns require so much work that they can't run as many of them as they need to
* Multi-touch cross-selling campaigns (for example, savings accounts to loans) with excellent margins, but no way to know which campaign touches perform best
* Getting swamped with manual record-keeping; for example, spreadsheet mistakes take hours to find and fix
* Poor integration with third-party tools for preparing, sending, and evaluating campaign materials, for Example.
o Webhook not firing,
o Reaching API limit
o Synchronization errors with third-party tools and Salesforce
* Inadequate number of lead stages and qualification levels, making it difficult to evaluate lead value, especially in multi-touch campaigns Despite the absence of an external Sales team, Marketing Operations would like to improve the granularity of their lead tracking, including both lifecycle stages and quality levels, with "no score" and negative levels.
Some of Unicorn's customers use their financial products and services. Marketing wants to roll out a "Weekly rollup" email to customers who are opted in for email. This email will show a quick snapshot of how each product/service those customers have with Unicorn perform.
The data to send these emails must be set up to sync to the Adobe Marketo Engage instance for each customer.
Each customer can own multiple of the same product, or a number of products/services.
How should this data be pushed into Marketo Engage to be used most effectively?
- A. Sync this data on the "Person' Level in a number of fields for "Product" or "Service" Build Segmentations for Product and Service Add Segments into the Email as Dynamic content for personalization
- B. Build two Custom Objects, one called "Products" and one called "Services" to link onto Person with relevant fields Use an Email Scripting token in the email so it can be personalized for each email recipient
- C. Create a maximum of 3 fields for each piece of data for both Products and Services onto the "Person" Level Add each field into Email Scripting tokens then use to turn the module on or off if they have less than 3 products
正解：B
解説：
Explanation
Building two Custom Objects, one called "Products" and one called "Services" to link onto Person with relevant fields is the best way to push the data into Marketo Engage. This way, you can store multiple records of products and services for each person, and use an Email Scripting token in the email to personalize it for each recipient. Syncing this data on the "Person" level in a number of fields for "Product" or "Service" would limit the number of products and services you can store for each person, and would require building Segmentations for Product and Service and adding Segments into the Email as Dynamic content for personalization. Creating a maximum of 3 fields for each piece of data for both Products and Services onto the
"Person" level would also limit the number of products and services you can store for each person, and would require adding each field into Email Scripting tokens then use to turn the module on or off if they have less than 3 products.
https://nation.marketo.com/t5/product-blogs/custom-objects-best-practices-tips-and-tricks/ba-p/244199
質問 # 19
An Adobe Marketo Engage Consultant is reviewing all programs in an instance. Each campaign in each program contains at least three flow steps:
* If Acquisition Program is Empty, change Acquisition Program to the current program's name
* Change the status in the program (based on the action)
* Write an Interesting Moment
These flow steps happen in almost every campaign.
How can the Consultant edit the programs for scalability and efficiency?
- A. Create global Interesting Moments campaigns based on specific triggers and using tokens
- B. Remove the program status change because this will be handled by the Acquisition Program update
- C. Create a global program and coordinating campaigns to update the acquisition program to the latest program touched
正解：C
解説：
Explanation
The Consultant can edit the programs for scalability and efficiency by creating a global program and coordinating campaigns to update the acquisition program to the latest program touched. This will allow the Consultant to streamline and optimize the process of updating the acquisition program for each lead, instead of having multiple flow steps in each campaign. The global program can use triggers and filters to capture leads from different sources and channels, and use tokens to dynamically update the acquisition program based on the latest program touched. This will also reduce the number of campaigns in the queue and improve the campaign performance.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Acquisition+Program
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Global+Programs
質問 # 20
A company implements Workspaces and Partitions for global regional marketing operations. They need to separate their Workspaces into North America, APAC, and EMEA regions as each region should not see the other region's marketing activities. They also have a Default Workspace. The Default Workspace has access to all Person Partitions. Each regional Workspace has access to their own regional Person Partition. The default dedupe key for the Unicorn Adobe Marketo Engage instance is email address.
A form that exists in the the North America workspace is filled out by a new person.
Which default behavior should be expected?
- A. The new person will be created in the default Partition and should remain there as long as the North America workspace has access to the default Partition
- B. The new person will be created in the North America Partition where the form exists
- C. The new person will be created in the default Partition and immediately routed to the North O America Partition
正解：B
解説：
Explanation
The new person will be created in the North America Partition where the form exists because that is where the lead source is located. The Default Workspace has access to all Person Partitions but it does not determine where new leads are created.
https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/marketo/using/home.html
質問 # 21
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect joins a company and needs to audit a prospect engagement scoring model. The previous administrator did not properly set up or maintain the model. The Marketing and Sales teams identify all engagement elements they want the new revamped model to score on. The administrator needs to make improvements.
According to best practices, what are the three important elements for the Architect to consider when updating the scoring model? (Choose three.)
- A. All scoring triggers are held in an operational Program in Marketing Activities.
- B. The frequency of scoring is considered in the implementation of the model.
- C. A new Channel is set up for "Scoring" and all Programs related to scoring use this Channel.
- D. Scoring tokens are in use for all scoring values in the model.
- E. Make sure only Leads are scored on this model, not the entire database.
- F. The scoring for all form activities happens within the individual form Programs.
正解：A、B、D
解説：
Explanation
The three important elements for the Architect to consider when updating the scoring model are to use scoring tokens for all scoring values in the model, to consider the frequency of scoring in the implementation of the model, and to hold all scoring triggers in an operational program in Marketing Activities. These elements will help the Architect to audit and improve the existing prospect engagement scoring model according to best practices. Using scoring tokens for all scoring values in the model will enable the Architect to easily adjust and maintain the scoring values across different campaigns and programs, instead of hard-coding them.
Considering the frequency of scoring in the implementation of the model will enable the Architect to avoid over-scoring or under-scoring leads based on their actions and behaviors, and to set appropriate time frames and limits for scoring triggers. Holding all scoring triggers in an operational program in Marketing Activities will enable the Architect to centralize and organize all the scoring campaigns and assets in one place, instead of scattering them across different folders or workspaces.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Scoring+Overview
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Best+Practices%3A+Lead+Scoring
質問 # 22
After evaluating global operations, the Marketing Operations team for a mid-sized organization determines that changes must be made to how many operational processes are running in their Adobe Marketo Engage instance. Some processes that cleanse and enrich the data being synced to Marketo Engage from Salesforce must be retired. The team negotiates a new process with Sales Operations to make values in certain data fields compulsory before a salesperson can save a new Contact in the CRM.
Before pushing this change live, which stakeholders must be enabled in the new process?
- A. The CMO. Data Analysts, the Head of Sales, and the Marketing team
- B. Marketing team, Sales Operations, and the Head of Sales
- C. Sales Operations, Sales Representatives, Sales Managers, and Data Analysts
- D. CMO, CFO, Sales Operations, Head of Sales, and the Marketing team
正解：C
解説：
Explanation
The stakeholders that must be enabled in the new process are Sales Operations, Sales Representatives, Sales Managers, and Data Analysts. This is because these are the roles that are directly involved in creating, managing, and reporting on Contacts in the CRM. Sales Operations is responsible for setting up and enforcing the new data validation rules. Sales Representatives and Sales Managers are responsible for entering and updating Contact data in compliance with the new rules. Data Analysts are responsible for monitoring and evaluating the data quality and performance metrics. The other options are not as relevant or necessary as this one, because they do notinclude all the key roles or they include roles that are not directly affected by the new process.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Best+Practices%3A+Data+Management
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Salesforce+Sync%3A+Overview
質問 # 23
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect at Cookieless Monsters Inc. is creating a report on Revenue Explorer to track Marketing Influence on Opportunity Closed-Won by First-Touch (FT) and Multi-Touch (MT) attribution models of Marketo Engage.
Which two factors should the Architect consider while setting up FT and MT attribution reports on Revenue Explorer? (Choose two.)
- A. Credit is split evenly, and credit cannot be given for something that happened in the past.
- B. Credit is not split evenly, and credit cannot be given for something that happened in the past.
- C. FT attribution answers, "Which programs are most influential in moving people forward in the sales cycle over time?" and MT answers, "Which programs are good at acquiring profitable new names?"
- D. FT attribution answers, "Which programs are good at acquiring profitable new names?" and MT answers, "Which programs are most influential in moving people forward in the sales cycle over time?"
- E. Credit can be manually assigned, and credit can be given for something that happened in the past.
正解：A、D
解説：
Explanation
The two factors that the Architect should consider while setting up FT and MT attribution reports on Revenue Explorer are that credit is split evenly, and credit cannot be given for something that happened in the past, and that FT attribution answers,"Which programs are good at acquiring profitable new names?" and MT attribution answers, "Which programs are most influential in moving people forward in the sales cycle over time?". These factors will help the Architect to understand and apply the logic and purpose of each attribution model. Credit is split evenly means that each program that a person interacted with in their journey will receive an equal share of credit for influencing the opportunity or revenue outcome, regardless of the timing or impact of the interaction. Credit cannot be given for something that happened in the past means that a person must have interacted with a program before becoming an opportunity or a customer, otherwise the program will not receive any credit for influencing the outcome. FT attribution answers, "Which programs are good at acquiring profitable new names?" means that this model assigns 100% credit to the first program that a person interacted with before becoming a known lead, which measures how well a program is generating new leads for the pipeline. MT attribution answers, "Which programs are most influential in moving people forward in the sales cycle over time?" means that this model assigns partial credit to multiple programs that a person interacted with throughout their journey from lead to opportunity to customer, which measures how well a program is influencing and nurturing leads along the funnel stages.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Attribution+Models
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/First+Touch+Attribution
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Multi-Touch+Attribution
質問 # 24
An Administrator wants to pull lifecycle data into a Revenue Explorer program membership analysis without an active revenue cycle model. The company wants to be able to see which programs are fueling the lifecycle.
Which two items must be in place to see that data in one view? (Choose two.)
- A. An approved Revenue Cycle Modeler
- B. A custom field that is enabled in Revenue Explorer
- C. A custom field that is captured the lifecycle stage
- D. A custom field that contains the first touch program name
- E. A trigger for "manual transitions" in the Revenue Cycle Modeler
正解：B、C
解説：
Explanation
The two items that must be in place to see that data in one view are a custom field that is enabled in Revenue Explorer and a custom field that captures the lifecycle stage. These items will help the Administrator to pull lifecycle data into a Revenue Explorer program membership analysis without an active revenue cycle model, as well as to see which programs are fueling the lifecycle. A custom field that is enabled in Revenue Explorer will allow the Administrator to use it as a dimension or measure in Revenue Explorer reports and dashboards.
A custom field that captures the lifecycle stage will allow the Administrator to track and segment leads based on their stage in the funnel.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Revenue+Explorer
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Custom+Fields
質問 # 25
When reviewing completion of a REST API Webhook, two URLs can be used to perform an initial validation and make sure leads will pass correctly.
Which two combinations of URL and associated parameters should be used to validate the REST API?
(Choose two.)
- A. Endpoint URL with Access Token and Client ID
- B. Endpoint URL with Access Token and Your Email Address
- C. Identity URL with Client Score and Client ID
- D. Identity URL with Client ID and Client Secret
- E. Endpoint URL with Client ID, Your Email Address, and Client Secret
正解：B、D
解説：
Explanation
The two combinations of URL and associated parameters that should be used to validate the REST API are Endpoint URL with Access Token and Your Email Address and Identity URL with Client ID and Client Secret. These combinations will allow the user to perform an initial validation and make sure leads will pass correctly through the REST API Webhook. The Endpoint URL with Access Token and Your Email Address will allow the user to test the functionality of the endpoint service and verify that the leads can be submitted successfully. The Identity URL with Client ID and Client Secret will allow the user to obtain an access token for authentication and authorization purposes.
References: https://developers.marketo.com/rest-api/
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Webhooks
質問 # 26
A Sales team reports to Marketing that they receive false MQLs regularly. The Adobe Marketo Engage instance has three fields to track lead scores:
* "Total Score" is a sum of Behavior and Demographic Scores.
* A prospect gets graduated to MQL as soon as "Behavior Score" changes to 100 or greater and 'Demographic Score" must be at least 20.
* All "Demographic Score" smart campaigns are set up using "Person is Created" trigger with no filters.
The Marketo Engage Administrator audits the false MQLs and learns that most of them received a
"Demographic Score" of +20 for being in a target "Job Title" and preferred "Country". Their "Demographic Scoring" was not completed. They received -10 for the "Industry" because these false MQLs are from Universities.
Which two sets of actions should the Architect take to stop sending the false MQLs to the Sales team? (Choose two.)
- A. Use trigger "Score is Changed" on "Demographic Field"
In the Flow steps, use "Wait", "Remove from Flow", and "Change Data Value" for updating
"Demographic MQL Score" field - B. Use trigger "Not Score is Changed" on "Demographic Field"
In the Flow steps, use "Change Score", "Remove from Flow", and "Change Data Value" for updating "Demographic MQL Score" field - C. Create a Boolean field and Smart-Campaign called "Demographic MQL Score" Update the MQL Smart Campaign to use "Demographic MQL Score = True" as a filter and as a trigger
- D. Create a Score field and Smart-Campaign called "Demographic MQL Score" Update the MQL Smart Campaign to use "Demographic MQL Score = True" as a filter and as a trigger
- E. Use trigger "Score is Changed" on "Demographic Field"
In the Flow steps, use "Change Score", "Remove from Flow", and "Change Data Value" for updating "Demographic MQL Score" field
正解：B、C
解説：
Explanation
The two sets of actions that the Architect should take to stop sending the false MQLs to the Sales team are to use trigger "Not Score is Changed" on "Demographic Field" and to create a Boolean field and Smart-Campaign called "Demographic MQL Score". These actions will help the Architect to improve the lead scoring and qualification process, as well as to avoid sending leads that are not ready or qualified to the Sales team. Using trigger "Not Score is Changed" on "Demographic Field" will ensure that leads are scored only once based on their demographic attributes, instead of multiple times based on their behaviors. Creating a Boolean field and Smart-Campaign called "Demographic MQL Score" will enable the Architect to mark leads as Demographic MQLs based on their score and criteria, and to use this field as a filter and trigger for updating the MQL status.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Scoring+Overview
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Best+Practices%3A+Lead+Scoring
質問 # 27
An enterprise software company sells its products directly to its B2B customers but also sells their product through third-party sellers. The company runs marketing campaigns directly to their B2B target audience.
They also provide funds to the third-party sellers to run campaigns on the company's behalf. In return, the leads and engagement are provided by the third-party seller when a campaign is complete. Any data must be passed to Salesforce due to reporting being done in Salesforce.
Programs and channels should be set up to report on the efficacy of direct marketing and investment to third-party seller/partner marketing to determine how budget should be spent the following year.
How should this requirement be met?
- A. Two sets of event based channels should be created: one set for direct marketing and the otherfor third-party seller marketing
- B. One set of channels should be created, and separate program statuses should be used to designate Direct or Partner
- C. One set of channels should be created, and a tag should be used to determine Direct or Partner
正解：B
解説：
Explanation
The requirement should be met by creating one set of channels and using separate program statuses to designate Direct or Partner. This will allow the company to report on the efficacy of direct marketing and investment to third-party seller/partner marketing, as well as to determine how budget should be spent the following year. Creating one set of channels will enable the company to use consistent and standardized metrics and definitions for each channel type, such as webinar, paid social, virtual event, etc. Using separate program statuses to designate Direct or Partner will enable the company to differentiate and track the performance and ROI of each marketing channel based on whether it was executed by the company or by a third-party seller.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Programs+and+Channels
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Program+Statuses
質問 # 28
Refer to the case study.
UNICORN FINTECH COMPANY PROFILE
Unicorn Fintech is a mobile-only financial-servicesstartup created by a consortium of consumer banks to resell savings, checking, loan, transfer/remittance, and other services from a secure smartphone app. The company is venture-funded, and plans to reach profitability before a planned IPO in two years.
Business issues and requirements
Marketing is responsible for acquiring new customers 0 through online, television advertising, and email campaigns, and for cross-selling new services to customers through IM, email, and in-app campaigns.
Evaluating the success of these campaigns has been a persistent problem: although the company can track revenue by product line, it can't attribute those revenues to campaigns: for example, did a new loan come from onboarding a new customer, or by cross-selling a savings-account customer? Marketing currently uses crude, manual tools and guesswork to evaluate the quality and lifespan of new leads, and even the deliverability of emails in its external campaigns. As a result, the department can't allocate spending to the most productive campaigns, or decide how much different touchpoints in multi-stage campaigns contribute to revenue. Operational processes to connect lead data to CRM and other databases are entirely manual.
Staffing and leadership
Unicorn has fewer than 200 employees, and roles aren't always defined in traditional ways. Since customer acquisition and cross-selling are primarily through electronic channels, Marketing and IT roles especially often overlap. The traditional Sales role falls entirely to Marketing, and IT is responsible for the Salesforce CRM system, Google Analytics, and a handful of third-party integrations. The CMO and CIO work closely together on most initiatives, and budgets are typically project-driven rather than fixed annually. Individual contributors to Marketing campaigns include the Marketing Operations Manager, responsible for lead scoring and analytics. Key IT contacts include the CRM Administrator and Web Developer. Incidental contributors are the Corporate Attorney, who signs off on opt-in/out and DMARC policies.
Revenue sources
Unicorn earns commissions on financial services delivered by the banking consortium through its apps, including fixed finders' fees for what the company calls "skips"-customers who initially engage with Unicorn, but then "skip" to receive services directly from a consortium bank. Unicorn needs to attribute revenue from these customers to its own campaigns; currently, it's impossible to attribute ROI to individual campaigns, or provide documentation to claim commissions on "skips." Current and aspirational marketing technology Current Marketing technology consists of Marketable,an open-source lead management solution supported by a set of spreadsheets and scripts developed in-house. Marketable offers lead tracking and source attribution, but not multi-touch source attribution. Unicorn Fintech Marketing has difficulty linking the different stages of customer campaign journeys, and relies on scripts to translate Marketable's "sales alerts" into next steps it could use in multi-touch campaigns. IT has worked out scripts to input Marketable qualified leads into Salesforce, but the system is brittle and often requires manual intervention.
Current campaign management processes
A typical email campaign:
* Addresses a purchased (for customer acquisition) or0 in-house (for cross-sell) list. Purchased lists range from
300,000 to 1.5 million addresses
* Is sent from multiple data centers in the US and Canada
* Includes an "unsubscribe" opt-out below the message
* Is static; there are no formula fields
* Uses no deliverability authentication, nor integration 0 with any email management platform.
All campaigns to date direct respondents to a single 0 landing page with the company's "all markets" message.
More sophisticated targeting is a high priority.
Current lead management and attribution
Unicorn's lead-management process follows
Marketable's "out of the box" defaults: lead evaluation levels 1 through 3, lifecycle stages "unqualified" and
"qualified." The qualification processes are manual, and highly subjective: Marketing staff classify leads according to prospect email responses, including free-form comments. "Sales" followup is by email forms prompting higher levels of engagement. The company intends to phase out Marketable and replace spreadsheets and scripts with native features of whatever solution set it adopts.
Attribution processes are binary: response to a campaign email or web visit is rated a success if it results in a sale: there is no success rating assigned to TV ads that result in web visits, for example. Cost are not allocated to individual campaigns.
The Marketing department plans to expand outreach to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, in-house and third-party financial blogs), and wants to make sure it can assess the ROI of these channels, and the overall social media program.
Current governance processes
Currently, the Marketing department assigns content development and campaign management duties to team members on a campaign-by-campaign basis. All team members (and IT) have access to all assets and tools, which sometimes leads to duplication and conflicts. The CMO realizes that a more specialization will be necessary to support the social media campaigns, but hasn't decided on the optimal organizational model.
Input of qualified leads from Marketable into
Salesforce is by manual cut-and-paste, assisted by scripts; inconsistency of input practices across Marketing team members is a known problem; individual members have their own "go-to" fields: where one member might check "TV ad" as Lead Source, another would put that in the comments field.
CMO
The CMO's most important concerns are:
* The current solution has too many manual steps to scale with anticipated growth
* Without more sophisticated attribution, the company will overinvest in less productive campaigns, and underinvest in better ones
* In general, analytics integrations are manual, slow, and unreliable
* The current system completely misses "skips"-customers switching from the Unicorn app to consortium banks-an important source of revenue
* Documenting the value of Unicorn's Marketing processes is essential to the success of the planned IPO, and millions of dollars in stock valuation hangs in the balance.
CIO
The CIO is concerned primarily with:
* The amount of time his team spends patching up Marketing campaigns and CRM data transfers, at the expense of other, critical initiatives
* Quality and reliability of the Analytics information his team provides to Marketing MARKETING STAFF Marketing Operations staff concerns:
* Campaigns require so much work that they can't run as many of them as they need to
* Multi-touch cross-selling campaigns (for example, savings accounts to loans) with excellent margins, but no way to know which campaign touches perform best
* Getting swamped with manual record-keeping; for example, spreadsheet mistakes take hours to find and fix
* Poor integration with third-party tools for preparing, sending, and evaluating campaign materials, for Example.
o Webhook not firing,
o Reaching API limit
o Synchronization errors with third-party tools and Salesforce
* Inadequate number of lead stages and qualification levels, making it difficult to evaluate lead value, especially in multi-touch campaigns Despite the absence of an external Sales team, Marketing Operations would like to improve the granularity of their lead tracking, including both lifecycle stages and quality levels, with "no score" and negative levels.
Unicorn Fintech is using Salesforce and Adobe Marketo Engage. They want to change their lead sync and lead routing rules for new leads that are generated through Marketo Engage forms. The Marketing Operations Manager needs to help them build new automation. Leads must reach a minimum lead score of 50 prior to being synced for Inside Sales to follow up. Prior to syncing to Salesforce, they want to make sure that each lead has a minimum data set of lead source and country. The Inside Sales Managers in each region cannot agree on a single global process for which leads should be assigned to which Inside Sales reps once the leads are created in Salesforce. They want the flexibility to decide at the country level.
What is the most appropriate, scalable process for the Marketing Operations Manager to build?
- A. Use inferred data to populate the country field, use a hidden field to populate lead source, trigger the sync when the person reaches 50 points, and assign to an Inside Sales rep
- B. Include country as a form field, use a hidden field to populate lead source, trigger the sync immediately, and assign to a country lead queue
- C. Include country as a form field, use a hidden field to populate lead source, trigger the sync when the person reaches 50 points, and assign to a country lead queue
- D. Use inferred data to populate the country and lead source fields, trigger the sync immediately, and assign directly to the Inside Sales Managers in each region
正解：C
解説：
Explanation
Including country as a form field, using a hidden field to populate lead source, triggering the sync when the person reaches 50 points, and assigning to a country lead queue is the most appropriate, scalable process for the Marketing Operations Manager to build. This way, the process ensures that each lead has a minimum data set of lead source and country, that the lead score is high enough to indicate interest and readiness, and that the lead routing is flexible enough to accommodate different regional preferences. Using inferred data to populate the country field or the lead source field would not be reliable or accurate, as inferred data can be incorrect or missing. Triggering the sync immediately would not respect the lead score threshold of 50 points. Assigning to an Inside Sales rep or an Inside Sales Manager directly would not allow for flexibility or load balancing.
Assigning to a country lead queue would allow for more control and visibility over the lead distribution
質問 # 29
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect has just hired a new person to join their team. They have been tasked with building a new lifecycle model and you work together to develop a solution. The top half of the funnel stages (Known, Engaged, MQL) will be driven by Marketo Engage where as the bottom half of the funnel will be driven by specific data value changes in salesforce. Due to this quarter's budget reasons, there were not enough funds to subscribe to Revenue Explorer or Bizible but it will be prioritized for the next fiscal year.
Which scalable approach should the Architect choose to ensure that the lifecycle model is tracking lead stage changes accurately?
- A. Build a program to listen to the movement driven by the Revenue Cycle Model.
- B. Build trigger logic within the Revenue Cycle Model.
- C. Build trigger logic in a program. Build the triggers in the Revenue Cycle Model to listen for stage changes driven by the program.
- D. Build trigger logic in a program.Create a field for revenue stage and a date field for each stage to track date of entry into that field.
正解：B
解説：
Explanation
The scalable approach that the Architect should choose to ensure that the lifecycle model is tracking lead stage changes accurately is to build trigger logic within the Revenue Cycle Model. This approach will allow the Architect to create a lifecycle model that is driven by Marketo Engage for the top half of the funnel stages and by specific data value changes in Salesforce for the bottom half of the funnel stages, without requiring an active revenue cycle model. Building trigger logic within the Revenue Cycle Model will enable the Architect to define the criteria and conditions for each stage transition, as well as to track and measure the lead movement across the funnel stages.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Revenue+Cycle+Modeler
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Revenue+Cycle+Modeler+Best+Practices
質問 # 30
Refer to the case study.
UNICORN FINTECH COMPANY PROFILE
Unicorn Fintech is a mobile-only financial-servicesstartup created by a consortium of consumer banks to resell savings, checking, loan, transfer/remittance, and other services from a secure smartphone app. The company is venture-funded, and plans to reach profitability before a planned IPO in two years.
Business issues and requirements
Marketing is responsible for acquiring new customers 0 through online, television advertising, and email campaigns, and for cross-selling new services to customers through IM, email, and in-app campaigns.
Evaluating the success of these campaigns has been a persistent problem: although the company can track revenue by product line, it can't attribute those revenues to campaigns: for example, did a new loan come from onboarding a new customer, or by cross-selling a savings-account customer? Marketing currently uses crude, manual tools and guesswork to evaluate the quality and lifespan of new leads, and even the deliverability of emails in its external campaigns. As a result, the department can't allocate spending to the most productive campaigns, or decide how much different touchpoints in multi-stage campaigns contribute to revenue. Operational processes to connect lead data to CRM and other databases are entirely manual.
Staffing and leadership
Unicorn has fewer than 200 employees, and roles aren't always defined in traditional ways. Since customer acquisition and cross-selling are primarily through electronic channels, Marketing and IT roles especially often overlap. The traditional Sales role falls entirely to Marketing, and IT is responsible for the Salesforce CRM system, Google Analytics, and a handful of third-party integrations. The CMO and CIO work closely together on most initiatives, and budgets are typically project-driven rather than fixed annually. Individual contributors to Marketing campaigns include the Marketing Operations Manager, responsible for lead scoring and analytics. Key IT contacts include the CRM Administrator and Web Developer. Incidental contributors are the Corporate Attorney, who signs off on opt-in/out and DMARC policies.
Revenue sources
Unicorn earns commissions on financial services delivered by the banking consortium through its apps, including fixed finders' fees for what the company calls "skips"-customers who initially engage with Unicorn, but then "skip" to receive services directly from a consortium bank. Unicorn needs to attribute revenue from these customers to its own campaigns; currently, it's impossible to attribute ROI to individual campaigns, or provide documentation to claim commissions on "skips." Current and aspirational marketing technology Current Marketing technology consists of Marketable,an open-source lead management solution supported by a set of spreadsheets and scripts developed in-house. Marketable offers lead tracking and source attribution, but not multi-touch source attribution. Unicorn Fintech Marketing has difficulty linking the different stages of customer campaign journeys, and relies on scripts to translate Marketable's "sales alerts" into next steps it could use in multi-touch campaigns. IT has worked out scripts to input Marketable qualified leads into Salesforce, but the system is brittle and often requires manual intervention.
Current campaign management processes
A typical email campaign:
* Addresses a purchased (for customer acquisition) or0 in-house (for cross-sell) list. Purchased lists range from
300,000 to 1.5 million addresses
* Is sent from multiple data centers in the US and Canada
* Includes an "unsubscribe" opt-out below the message
* Is static; there are no formula fields
* Uses no deliverability authentication, nor integration 0 with any email management platform.
All campaigns to date direct respondents to a single 0 landing page with the company's "all markets" message.
More sophisticated targeting is a high priority.
Current lead management and attribution
Unicorn's lead-management process follows
Marketable's "out of the box" defaults: lead evaluation levels 1 through 3, lifecycle stages "unqualified" and
"qualified." The qualification processes are manual, and highly subjective: Marketing staff classify leads according to prospect email responses, including free-form comments. "Sales" followup is by email forms prompting higher levels of engagement. The company intends to phase out Marketable and replace spreadsheets and scripts with native features of whatever solution set it adopts.
Attribution processes are binary: response to a campaign email or web visit is rated a success if it results in a sale: there is no success rating assigned to TV ads that result in web visits, for example. Cost are not allocated to individual campaigns.
The Marketing department plans to expand outreach to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, in-house and third-party financial blogs), and wants to make sure it can assess the ROI of these channels, and the overall social media program.
Current governance processes
Currently, the Marketing department assigns content development and campaign management duties to team members on a campaign-by-campaign basis. All team members (and IT) have access to all assets and tools, which sometimes leads to duplication and conflicts. The CMO realizes that a more specialization will be necessary to support the social media campaigns, but hasn't decided on the optimal organizational model.
Input of qualified leads from Marketable into
Salesforce is by manual cut-and-paste, assisted by scripts; inconsistency of input practices across Marketing team members is a known problem; individual members have their own "go-to" fields: where one member might check "TV ad" as Lead Source, another would put that in the comments field.
CMO
The CMO's most important concerns are:
* The current solution has too many manual steps to scale with anticipated growth
* Without more sophisticated attribution, the company will overinvest in less productive campaigns, and underinvest in better ones
* In general, analytics integrations are manual, slow, and unreliable
* The current system completely misses "skips"-customers switching from the Unicorn app to consortium banks-an important source of revenue
* Documenting the value of Unicorn's Marketing processes is essential to the success of the planned IPO, and millions of dollars in stock valuation hangs in the balance.
CIO
The CIO is concerned primarily with:
* The amount of time his team spends patching up Marketing campaigns and CRM data transfers, at the expense of other, critical initiatives
* Quality and reliability of the Analytics information his team provides to Marketing MARKETING STAFF Marketing Operations staff concerns:
* Campaigns require so much work that they can't run as many of them as they need to
* Multi-touch cross-selling campaigns (for example, savings accounts to loans) with excellent margins, but no way to know which campaign touches perform best
* Getting swamped with manual record-keeping; for example, spreadsheet mistakes take hours to find and fix
* Poor integration with third-party tools for preparing, sending, and evaluating campaign materials, for Example.
o Webhook not firing,
o Reaching API limit
o Synchronization errors with third-party tools and Salesforce
* Inadequate number of lead stages and qualification levels, making it difficult to evaluate lead value, especially in multi-touch campaigns Despite the absence of an external Sales team, Marketing Operations would like to improve the granularity of their lead tracking, including both lifecycle stages and quality levels, with "no score" and negative levels.
The social media team at Unicorn Fintech has been running paid search, paid social, and retargeting ads for the past year. Each of these is an Adobe Marketo Engage program channel and is set up to capture program member success and cost. The newly formed Account Based Marketing team (ABM) also wants to run paid social and retargeting ads but has their own budget. They want to report on their ABM efforts and ROI of their specific programs separate from the social media team. The social media team wants to be able to see how all campaigns are performing as well as easily separate the ABM efforts.
How should the Marketo Engage Architect set up the program structure to achieve these reporting goals?
- A. Use the existing paid social and retargeting channels and add a tag for ABM
- B. Create new ABM channels for paid social and retargeting
- C. Use the existing paid social and retargeting channels and add ABM to the program name
正解：B
解説：
Explanation
Creating new ABM channels for paid social and retargeting is the best way to set up the program structure to achieve the reporting goals. This way, the ABM team can have their own channels with their own success and cost metrics, and report on their ROI separately from the social media team. The social media team can also see how all campaigns are performing by using the existing channels, and easily separate the ABM efforts by filtering by channel. Using the existing paid social and retargeting channels and adding ABM to the program name would not be a good solution, as it would not allow for separate cost and success metrics for the ABM programs. Using the existing paid social and retargeting channels and adding a tag for ABM would not be a good solution, as it would not allow for separate cost and success metrics for the ABM programs, and it would require manual tagging of each program.
質問 # 31
UNICORN FINTECH COMPANY PROFILE
Unicorn Fintech is a mobile-only financial-servicesstartup created by a consortium of consumer banks to resell savings, checking, loan, transfer/remittance, and other services from a secure smartphone app. The company is venture-funded, and plans to reach profitability before a planned IPO in two years.
Business issues and requirements
Marketing is responsible for acquiring new customers 0 through online, television advertising, and email campaigns, and for cross-selling new services to customers through IM, email, and in-app campaigns.
Evaluating the success of these campaigns has been a persistent problem: although the company can track revenue by product line, it can't attribute those revenues to campaigns: for example, did a new loan come from onboarding a new customer, or by cross-selling a savings-account customer? Marketing currently uses crude, manual tools and guesswork to evaluate the quality and lifespan of new leads, and even the deliverability of emails in its external campaigns. As a result, the department can't allocate spending to the most productive campaigns, or decide how much different touchpoints in multi-stage campaigns contribute to revenue. Operational processes to connect lead data to CRM and other databases are entirely manual.
Staffing and leadership
Unicorn has fewer than 200 employees, and roles aren't always defined in traditional ways. Since customer acquisition and cross-selling are primarily through electronic channels, Marketing and IT roles especially often overlap. The traditional Sales role falls entirely to Marketing, and IT is responsible for the Salesforce CRM system, Google Analytics, and a handful of third-party integrations. The CMO and CIO work closely together on most initiatives, and budgets are typically project-driven rather than fixedannually. Individual contributors to Marketing campaigns include the Marketing Operations Manager, responsible for lead scoring and analytics. Key IT contacts include the CRM Administrator and Web Developer. Incidental contributors are the Corporate Attorney, who signs off on opt-in/out and DMARC policies.
Revenue sources
Unicorn earns commissions on financial services delivered by the banking consortium through its apps, including fixed finders' fees for what the company calls "skips"-customers who initially engage with Unicorn, but then "skip" to receive services directly from a consortium bank. Unicorn needs to attribute revenue from these customers to its own campaigns; currently, it's impossible to attribute ROI to individual campaigns, or provide documentation to claim commissions on "skips." Current and aspirational marketing technology Current Marketing technology consists of Marketable,an open-source lead management solution supported by a set of spreadsheets and scripts developed in-house. Marketable offers lead tracking and source attribution, but not multi-touch source attribution. Unicorn Fintech Marketing has difficulty linking the different stages of customer campaign journeys, and relies on scripts to translate Marketable's "sales alerts" into next steps it could use in multi-touch campaigns. IT has worked out scripts to input Marketable qualified leads into Salesforce, but the system is brittle and often requires manual intervention.
Current campaign management processes
A typical email campaign:
* Addresses a purchased (for customer acquisition) or0 in-house (for cross-sell) list. Purchased lists range from
300,000 to 1.5 million addresses
* Is sent from multiple data centers in the US and Canada
* Includes an "unsubscribe" opt-out below the message
* Is static; there are no formula fields
* Uses no deliverability authentication, nor integration 0 with any email management platform.
All campaigns to date direct respondents to a single 0 landing page with the company's "all markets" message.
More sophisticated targeting is a high priority.
Current lead management and attribution
Unicorn's lead-management process follows
Marketable's "out of the box" defaults: lead evaluation levels 1 through 3, lifecycle stages "unqualified" and
"qualified." The qualification processes are manual, and highly subjective: Marketing staff classify leads according to prospect email responses, including free-form comments. "Sales" followup is by email forms prompting higher levels of engagement. The company intends to phase out Marketable and replace spreadsheets and scripts with native features of whatever solution set it adopts.
Attribution processes are binary: response to a campaign email or web visit is rated a success if it results in a sale: there is no success rating assigned to TV ads that result in web visits, for example. Cost are not allocated to individual campaigns.
The Marketing department plans to expand outreach to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, in-house and third-party financial blogs), and wants to make sure it can assess the ROI of these channels, and the overall social media program.
Current governance processes
Currently, the Marketing department assigns content development and campaign management duties to team members on a campaign-by-campaign basis. All team members (and IT) have access to all assets and tools, which sometimes leads to duplication and conflicts. The CMO realizes that a more specialization will be necessary to support the social media campaigns, but hasn't decided on the optimal organizational model.
Input of qualified leads from Marketable into
Salesforce is by manual cut-and-paste, assisted by scripts; inconsistency of input practices across Marketing team members is a known problem; individual members have their own "go-to" fields: where one member might check "TV ad" as Lead Source, another would put that in the comments field.
CMO
The CMO's most important concerns are:
* The current solution has too many manual steps to scale with anticipated growth
* Without more sophisticated attribution, the company will overinvest in less productive campaigns, and underinvest in better ones
* In general, analytics integrations are manual, slow, and unreliable
* The current system completely misses "skips"-customers switching from the Unicorn app to consortium banks-an important source of revenue
* Documenting the value of Unicorn's Marketing processes is essential to the success of the planned IPO, and millions of dollars in stock valuation hangs in the balance.
CIO
The CIO is concerned primarily with:
* The amount of time his team spends patching up Marketing campaigns and CRM data transfers, at the expense of other, critical initiatives
* Quality and reliability of the Analytics information his team provides to Marketing MARKETING STAFF Marketing Operations staff concerns:
* Campaigns require so much work that they can't run as many of them as they need to
* Multi-touch cross-selling campaigns (for example, savings accounts to loans) with excellent margins, but no way to know which campaign touches perform best
* Getting swamped with manual record-keeping; for example, spreadsheet mistakes take hours to find and fix
* Poor integration with third-party tools for preparing, sending, and evaluating campaign materials, for Example.
o Webhook not firing,
o Reaching API limit
o Synchronization errors with third-party tools and Salesforce
* Inadequate number of lead stages and qualification levels, making it difficult to evaluate lead value, especially in multi-touch campaigns Despite the absence of an external Sales team, Marketing Operations would like to improve the granularity of their lead tracking, including both lifecycle stages and quality levels, with "no score" and negative levels.
An Adobe Marketo Engage customer recently started using a new Survey platform to measure Net Promoter Score (NPS). The company began using this platform 3 months ago. The company invites new customers to complete the surveys by batching out invites monthly to imported lists of customers that meet the criteria from data held in Salesforce Custom Objects. The company has the native Salesforce sync in place. The survey invite email is sent from Marketo Engage and currently invites the customer to the survey platform via a generic link to start the survey. The company can not know whether the customer completed the survey or what responses they provided. The company does not want to maintain history of the NPS score. They want to know the latest NPS score only.
Which three important architectural recommendations should an Architect suggest to scale this platform and its integration with Marketo Engage? (Choose three.)
- A. Sync relevant Custom Object data from Salesforce and automate inviting customers to the survey
- B. Create a Custom Object in Adobe Marketo Engage to store all survey responses
- C. Pass a unique customer identifier to the survey platform for each survey invite sent
- D. Filter on NPS values using a Smartlist and communicate with different audiences based on their level of satisfaction
- E. Integrate survey responses back into custom fields in Adobe Marketo Engage to capture key survey responses
- F. Create a specific channel for "NPS Survey'1 in Adobe Marketo Engage to track the Program
正解：A、C
解説：
Explanation
The three important architectural recommendations that an Architect should suggest to scale this platform and its integration with Marketo Engage are to sync relevant Custom Object data from Salesforce and automate inviting customers to the survey, to pass a unique customer identifier to the survey platform for each survey invite sent, and to integrate survey responses back into custom fields in Adobe Marketo Engage to capture key survey responses. These recommendations will help the company to streamline and optimize their NPS survey process, as well as to track and measure the survey results and customer satisfaction. Syncing relevant Custom Object data from Salesforce will allow the company to use smart campaigns and triggers to invite customers to the survey based on their criteria, instead of manually importing lists. Passing a unique customer identifier to the survey platform will allow the company to link the survey responses to the individual customers, instead of using a generic link. Integrating survey responses back into custom fields in Adobe Marketo Engage will allow the company to store and update the latest NPS score for each customer, as well as other key survey responses, instead of creating a Custom Object or relying on an external platform.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Custom+Objects+Overview
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Smart+Campaigns+Overview
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Webhooks
質問 # 32
An Architect notices that deliverability is slowly decreasing over time. After pulling a year of reports, the Administrator notices that the number of emails per month has increased from 3 to 10. The unsubscribe rates nearly double each quarter. Per the CMO, the amount of marketing activity must remain the same.
Which two actions can the Architectr take to make sure emails reach people in their database? (Choose two.)
- A. Create a "marketable" smart list to include on every send that excludes multiple soft bounces
- B. Work with the marketing team to decrease the number of email sends per month
- C. Make marketing emails operational so people who have unsubscribed continue to receive ^ communications
- D. Decrease behavior scores when someone unsubscribes from an email
- E. Implement communication limits so people receive fewer emails
正解：B、E
解説：
Explanation
Implementing communication limits and decreasing the number of email sends per month are two actions that can help improve deliverability by reducing email fatigue and spam complaints. Making marketing emails operational or decreasing behavior scores are not recommended as they can harm the sender reputation and engagement. Creating a "marketable" smart list is not relevant to the deliverability issue.
https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/marketo-events/events/marketo-and-mochas/2023/deliverability-part-o
質問 # 33
......
合格保証付きのAdobe Marketo Engage AD0-E556試験問題集：https://jp.fast2test.com/AD0-E556-premium-file.html