リアルなSSCP最新試験は2025年最新のSSCP練習テスト問題集を提供しています [Q159-Q181]

Share

リアルなSSCP最新試験Fast2test 2025年最新ののSSCP練習テスト問題集を提供しています

全問SSCP問題集でandSystem Security Certified Practitioner (SSCP)トレーニングコース受験生を学習してパスさせるSystem Security Certified Practitioner (SSCP)試験無料問題集!


ISCのSSCP認定試験は、システムセキュリティの概念と実践に深い理解が必要な難しい試験です。アクセス制御、暗号化、ネットワークおよび通信セキュリティ、リスク管理、セキュリティオペレーションおよび管理など、システムセキュリティのさまざまな領域での候補者の知識とスキルをテストするよう設計されています。この試験に合格した候補者は、システムセキュリティの専門家として認められ、世界中の組織から高い需要があります。

 

質問 # 159
Which of the following does NOT use token-passing?

  • A. Token-ring
  • B. ARCnet
  • C. IEEE 802.3
  • D. FDDI

正解:C

解説:
Explanation/Reference:
IEEE 802.3 specifies the standard for Ethernet and uses CSMA/CD, not token-passing.
Source: KRUTZ, Ronald L & VINES, Russel D., The CISSP Prep Guide: Mastering the Ten Domains of Computer Security, John Wiley & Sons, 2001, Chapter 3: Telecommunications and Network Security (page
104).


質問 # 160
Which of the following would constitute the best example of a password to use for access to a system by a network administrator?

  • A. Jenny
  • B. holiday
  • C. GyN19Za!
  • D. Christmas12

正解:C

解説:
Section: Access Control
Explanation/Reference:
GyN19Za! would be the the best answer because it contains a mixture of upper and lower case characters, alphabetic and numeric characters, and a special character making it less vulnerable to password attacks.
All of the other answers are incorrect because they are vulnerable to brute force or dictionary attacks.
Passwords should not be common words or names. The addition of a number to the end of a common word only marginally strengthens it because a common password attack would also check combinations of words:
Christmas23
Christmas123
etc...


質問 # 161
What distinguishes a hacker / cracker from a phreak?

  • A. Phreaks specifically target data networks
  • B. Phreaks cause harm, hackers and crackers do not
  • C. Hackers and crackers specifically target telephone networks
  • D. Phreaks specifically target telephone networks

正解:D


質問 # 162
Which of the following is a set of data processing elements that increases the performance in a computer by overlapping the steps of different instructions?

  • A. pipelining
  • B. multitasking
  • C. reduced-instruction-set-computer (RISC)
  • D. complex-instruction-set-computer (CISC)

正解:A

解説:
Pipelining is a natural concept in everyday life, e.g. on an assembly line. Consider the assembly of a car: assume that certain steps in the assembly line are to install the engine, install the hood, and install the wheels (in that order, with arbitrary interstitial steps). A car on the assembly line can have only one of the three steps done at once. After the car has its engine installed, it moves on to having its hood installed, leaving the engine installation facilities available for the next car. The first car then moves on to wheel installation, the second car to hood installation, and a third car begins to have its engine installed. If engine installation takes 20 minutes, hood installation takes 5 minutes, and wheel installation takes 10 minutes, then finishing all three cars when only one car can be assembled at once would take 105 minutes. On the other hand, using the assembly line, the total time to complete all three is 75 minutes. At this point, additional cars will come off the assembly line at 20 minute increments.
In computing, a pipeline is a set of data processing elements connected in series, so that the output of one element is the input of the next one. The elements of a pipeline are often executed in parallel or in time-sliced fashion; in that case, some amount of buffer storage is often inserted between elements. Pipelining is used in processors to allow overlapping execution of multiple instructions within the same circuitry. The circuitry is usually divided into stages, including instruction decoding, arithmetic, and register fetching stages, wherein each stage processes one instruction at a time.
The following were not correct answers:
CISC: is a CPU design where single instructions execute several low-level operations (such as a load from memory, an arithmetic operation, and a memory store) within a single instruction.
RISC: is a CPU design based on simplified instructions that can provide higher performance as the simplicity enables much faster execution of each instruction.
Multitasking: is a method where multiple tasks share common processing resources, such as a CPU, through a method of fast scheduling that gives the appearance of parallelism, but in reality only one task is being performed at any one time.
Reference:
KRUTZ, Ronald L. & VINES, Russel D., The CISSP Prep Guide: Mastering the Ten Domains of Computer Security, pages 188-189.
Also see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pipeline_(computing)


質問 # 163
Which of the following is defined as a key establishment protocol based on the Diffie-Hellman algorithm proposed for IPsec but superseded by IKE?

  • A. OAKLEY
  • B. Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange Protocol
  • C. Simple Key-management for Internet Protocols (SKIP)
  • D. Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP)

正解:A

解説:
RFC 2828 (Internet Security Glossary) defines OAKLEY as a key establishment protocol (proposed for IPsec but superseded by IKE) based on the Diffie-Hellman algorithm and designed to be a compatible component of ISAKMP.
ISAKMP is an Internet IPsec protocol to negotiate, establish, modify, and delete security associations, and to exchange key generation and authentication data, independent of the
details of any specific key generation technique, key establishment protocol, encryption
algorithm, or authentication mechanism.
SKIP is a key distribution protocol that uses hybrid encryption to convey session keys that
are used to encrypt data in IP packets.
ISAKMP provides a framework for authentication and key exchange but does not define
them. ISAKMP is designed to be key exchange independant; that is, it is designed to
support many different key exchanges.
Oakley and SKEME each define a method to establish an authenticated key exchange.
This includes payloads construction, the information payloads carry, the order in which they
are processed and how they are used.
Oakley describes a series of key exchanges-- called modes and details the services
provided by each (e.g. perfect forward secrecy for keys, identity protection, and
authentication).
SKEME describes a versatile key exchange technique which provides anonymity,
repudiability, and quick key refreshment.
RFC 2049 describes the IKE protocol using part of Oakley and part of SKEME in
conjunction with ISAKMP to obtain authenticated keying material for use with ISAKMP, and
for other security associations such as AH and ESP for the IETF IPsec DOI.
While Oakley defines "modes", ISAKMP defines "phases". The relationship between the
two is very straightforward and IKE presents different exchanges as modes which operate
in one of two phases.
Phase 1 is where the two ISAKMP peers establish a secure, authenticated channel with
which to communicate. This is called the ISAKMP Security Association (SA). "Main Mode"
and "Aggressive Mode" each accomplish a phase 1 exchange. "Main Mode" and
"Aggressive Mode" MUST ONLY be used in phase 1.
Phase 2 is where Security Associations are negotiated on behalf of services such as IPsec
or any other service which needs key material and/or parameter negotiation. "Quick Mode"
accomplishes a phase 2 exchange. "Quick Mode" MUST ONLY be used in phase 2.
References:
CISSP: Certified Information Systems Security Professional Study Guide By James
Michael Stewart, Ed Tittel, Mike Chappl, page 397
RFC 2049 at: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2409 SHIREY, Robert W., RFC2828: Internet Security Glossary, may 2000. The All-in-one CISSP Exam Guide, 3rd Edition, by Shon Harris, page 674 The CISSP and CAP Prep Guide, Platinum Edition, by Krutz and Vines


質問 # 164
The number of violations that will be accepted or forgiven before a violation record is produced is called which of the following?

  • A. logging level
  • B. clipping level
  • C. forgiveness level
  • D. acceptance level

正解:B

解説:
The correct answer is "clipping level". This is the point at which a system decides to take some sort of action when an action repeats a preset number of times. That action may be to log the activity, lock a user account, temporarily close a port, etc.
Example: The most classic example of a clipping level is failed login attempts. If you have a system configured to lock a user's account after three failed login attemts, that is the "clipping level".
The other answers are not correct because:
Acceptance level, forgiveness level, and logging level are nonsensical terms that do not exist (to my knowledge) within network security.


質問 # 165
Which of the following are not Remote Access concerns?

  • A. Regular review of access privileges
  • B. Auditing of activities
  • C. Justification for remote access
  • D. Access badges

正解:D

解説:
Explanation/Reference:
Access badges are more relevant to physical security rather than remote access.
"Justification for remote access" is incorrect. Justification for remote access is a relevant concern.
"Auditing of activities" is incorrect. Auditing of activites is an imporant aspect to assure that malicious or unauthorized activities are not occuring.
"Regular review of access privileges" is incorrect. Regular review of remote accept privileges is an important management responsibility.
References:
AIO3, pp. 547 - 548


質問 # 166
Which protocol of the TCP/IP suite addresses reliable data transport?

  • A. Internet protocol (IP)
  • B. Internet control message protocol (ICMP)
  • C. Transmission control protocol (TCP)
  • D. User datagram protocol (UDP)

正解:C

解説:
Explanation/Reference:
TCP provides a full-duplex, connection-oriented, reliable, virtual circuit. It handles the sequencing and retransmission of lost packets.
Source: KRUTZ, Ronald L. & VINES, Russel D., The CISSP Prep Guide: Mastering the Ten Domains of Computer Security, John Wiley & Sons, 2001, Chapter 3: Telecommunications and Network Security (page
85).


質問 # 167
Notifying the appropriate parties to take action in order to determine the extent of the severity of an incident and to remediate the incident's effects is part of:

  • A. Incident Protection
  • B. Incident Response
  • C. Incident Evaluation
  • D. Incident Recognition

正解:B

解説:
Explanation/Reference:
These are core functions of the incident response process.
"Incident Evaluation" is incorrect. Evaluation of the extent and cause of the incident is a component of the incident response process.
"Incident Recognition" is incorrect. Recognition that an incident has occurred is the precursor to the initiation of the incident response process.
"Incident Protection" is incorrect. This is an almost-right-sounding nonsense answer to distract the unwary.
References
CBK, pp. 698 - 703


質問 # 168
What type of attack involves IP spoofing, ICMP ECHO and a bounce site?

  • A. IP spoofing attack
  • B. SYN attack
  • C. Smurf attack
  • D. Teardrop attack

正解:C

解説:
Explanation/Reference:
A smurf attack occurs when an attacker sends a spoofed (IP spoofing) PING (ICMP ECHO) packet to the broadcast address of a large network (the bounce site). The modified packet containing the address of the target system, all devices on its local network respond with a ICMP REPLY to the target system, which is then saturated with those replies. An IP spoofing attack is used to convince a system that it is communication with a known entity that gives an intruder access. It involves modifying the source address of a packet for a trusted source's address. A teardrop attack consists of modifying the length and fragmentation offset fields in sequential IP packets so the target system becomes confused and crashes after it receives contradictory instructions on how the fragments are offset on these packets. A SYN attack is when an attacker floods a system with connection requests but does not respond when the target system replies to those requests.
Source: KRUTZ, Ronald L. & VINES, Russel D., The CISSP Prep Guide: Mastering the Ten Domains of Computer Security, John Wiley & Sons, 2001, Chapter 3: Telecommunications and Network Security (page
76).


質問 # 169
All following observations about IPSec are correct except:

  • A. Default Hashing protocols are HMAC-MD5 or HMAC-SHA-1
  • B. Default Encryption protocol is Cipher Block Chaining mode DES, but other algorithms like ECC (Elliptic curve cryptosystem) can be used
  • C. Works only with Secret Key Cryptography
  • D. Support two communication modes - Tunnel mode and Transport mode

正解:C

解説:
Explanation/Reference:
Source: TIPTON, Harold F & KRAUSE, MICKI, Information Security Management Handbook, 4th Edition, Volume 2, 2001, CRC Press, NY, Pages 166-167.


質問 # 170
Which of the following is not appropriate in addressing object reuse?

  • A. Clearing memory blocks before they are allocated to a program or data.
  • B. Degaussing magnetic tapes when they're no longer needed.
  • C. Clearing buffered pages, documents, or screens from the local memory of a terminal or printer.
  • D. Deleting files on disk before reusing the space.

正解:D

解説:
Object reuse requirements, applying to systems rated TCSEC C2 and above, are used to protect files, memory, and other objects in a trusted system from being accidentally accessed by users who are not authorized to access them. Deleting files on disk merely erases file headers in a directory structure. It does not clear data from the disk surface, thus making files still recoverable.
All other options involve clearing used space, preventing any unauthorized access.


質問 # 171
When preparing a business continuity plan, who of the following is responsible for identifying and prioritizing time-critical systems?

  • A. Functional business units
  • B. BCP committee
  • C. Executive management staff
  • D. Senior business unit management

正解:D

解説:
Many elements of a BCP will address senior management, such as the statement of importance and priorities, the statement of organizational responsibility, and the statement of urgency and timing. Executive management staff initiates the project, gives final approval and gives ongoing support. The BCP committee directs the planning, implementation, and tests processes whereas functional business units participate in implementation and testing.


質問 # 172

  • A. PPTP
  • B. L2TP
  • C. LDAP
  • D. L2F

正解:C


質問 # 173
What attack involves the perpetrator sending spoofed packet(s) wich contains the same destination and source IP address as the remote host, the same port for the source and destination, having the SYN flag, and targeting any open ports that are open on the remote host?

  • A. Land attack
  • B. Boink attack
  • C. Smurf attack
  • D. Teardrop attack

正解:A

解説:
The Land attack involves the perpetrator sending spoofed packet(s) with the SYN flag set to the victim's machine on any open port that is listening. The packet(s) contain the same destination and source IP address as the host, causing the victim's machine to reply to itself repeatedly. In addition, most systems experience a total freeze up, where as CTRL-ALT-DELETE fails to work, the mouse and keyboard become non operational and the only method of correction is to reboot via a reset button on the system or by turning the machine off.
The Boink attack, a modified version of the original Teardrop and Bonk exploit programs, is very similar to the Bonk attack, in that it involves the perpetrator sending corrupt UDP packets to the host. It however allows the attacker to attack multiple ports where Bonk was mainly directed to port 53 (DNS).
The Teardrop attack involves the perpetrator sending overlapping packets to the victim, when their machine attempts to re-construct the packets the victim's machine hangs.
A Smurf attack is a network-level attack against hosts where a perpetrator sends a large amount of ICMP echo (ping) traffic at broadcast addresses, all of it having a spoofed source address of a victim. If the routing device delivering traffic to those broadcast addresses performs the IP broadcast to layer 2 broadcast function, most hosts on that IP network will take the ICMP echo request and reply to it with an echo reply each, multiplying the traffic by the number of hosts responding. On a multi-access broadcast network, there could potentially be hundreds of machines to reply to each packet.


質問 # 174
Which of the following is not a property of the Rijndael block cipher algorithm?

  • A. It could be used on a smart card.
  • B. It is suited for high speed chips with no area restrictions.
  • C. It operates on 64-bit plaintext blocks and uses a 128 bit key.
  • D. It employs a round transformation that is comprised of three layers of distinct and invertible transformations.

正解:C

解説:
All other properties above apply to the Rijndael algorithm, chosen as the AES standard to replace DES.
The AES algorithm is capable of using cryptographic keys of 128, 192, and 256 bits to encrypt and decrypt data in blocks of 128 bits. Rijndael was designed to handle additional block sizes and key lengths, however they are not adopted in the AES standard.
IDEA cipher algorithm operates on 64-bit plaintext blocks and uses a 128 bit key.


質問 # 175
Preservation of confidentiality within information systems requires that the information is not disclosed to:

  • A. Unauthorized persons.
  • B. Authorized person
  • C. Authorized persons and processes
  • D. Unauthorized persons or processes.

正解:D

解説:
Confidentiality assures that the information is not disclosed to unauthorized persons or processes.


質問 # 176
Cryptography does not concern itself with which of the following choices?

  • A. Confidentiality
  • B. Validation
  • C. Availability
  • D. Integrity

正解:B

解説:
The cryptography domain addresses the principles, means, and methods of disguising information to ensure its integrity, confidentiality, and authenticity. Unlike the other domains, cryptography does not completely support the standard of availability.
Availability
Cryptography supports all three of the core principles of information security. Many access control systems use cryptography to limit access to systems through the use of passwords. Many token- based authentication systems use cryptographic-based hash algorithms to compute one-time passwords. Denying unauthorized access prevents an attacker from entering and damaging the system or network, thereby denying access to authorized users if they damage or currupt the data.
Confidentiality
Cryptography provides confidentiality through altering or hiding a message so that ideally it cannot be understood by anyone except the intended recipient.
Integrity
Cryptographic tools provide integrity checks that allow a recipient to verify that a message has not been altered. Cryptographic tools cannot prevent a message from being altered, but they are effective to detect either intentional or accidental modification of the message. Additional Features of Cryptographic Systems In addition to the three core principles of information security listed above, cryptographic tools provide several more benefits.
Nonrepudiation
In a trusted environment, the authentication of the origin can be provided through the simple control of the keys. The receiver has a level of assurance that the message was encrypted by the sender, and the sender has trust that the message was not altered once it was received.
However, in a more stringent, less trustworthy environment, it may be necessary to provide assurance via a third party of who sent a message and that the message was indeed delivered to the right recipient. This is accomplished through the use of digital signatures and public key encryption. The use of these tools provides a level of nonrepudiation of origin that can be verified by a third party.
Once a message has been received, what is to prevent the recipient from changing the message and contesting that the altered message was the one sent by the sender? The nonrepudiation of delivery prevents a recipient from changing the message and falsely claiming that the message is in its original state. This is also accomplished through the use of public key cryptography and digital signatures and is verifiable by a trusted third party.
Authentication
Authentication is the ability to determine if someone or something is what it declares to be. This is primarily done through the control of the keys, because only those with access to the key are able to encrypt a message. This is not as strong as the nonrepudiation of origin, which will be reviewed shortly Cryptographic functions use several methods to ensure that a message has not been changed or altered. These include hash functions, digital signatures, and message authentication codes (MACs). The main concept is that the recipient is able to detect any change that has been made to a message, whether accidentally or intentionally.
Access Control
Through the use of cryptographic tools, many forms of access control are supported--from log-ins via passwords and passphrases to the prevention of access to confidential files or messages. In all cases, access would only be possible for those individuals that had access to the correct cryptographic keys.
NOTE FROM CLEMENT:
As you have seen this question was very recently updated with the latest content of the Official ISC2 Guide (OIG) to the CISSP CBK, Version 3.
Myself, I agree with most of you that cryptography does not help on the availability side and it is even the contrary sometimes if you loose the key for example. In such case you would loose access to the data and negatively impact availability. But the ISC2 is not about what I think or what you think, they have their own view of the world where they claim and state clearly that cryptography does address availability even thou it does not fully address it.
They look at crypto as the ever emcompassing tool it has become today. Where it can be use for authentication purpose for example where it would help to avoid corruption of the data through illegal access by an unauthorized user.
The question is worded this way in purpose, it is VERY specific to the CISSP exam context where ISC2 preaches that cryptography address availability even thou they state it does not fully address it. This is something new in the last edition of their book and something you must be aware of.
Best regards
Clement
The following terms are from the Software Development Security domain:
Validation: The assurance that a product, service, or system meets the needs of the customer and other identified stakeholders. It often involves acceptance and suitability with external customers.
Contrast with verification below."
Verification: The evaluation of whether or not a product, service, or system complies with a regulation, requirement, specification, or imposed condition. It is often an internal process.
Contrast with validation."
The terms above are from the Software Development Security Domain.


質問 # 177
Which type of attack would a competitive intelligence attack best classify as?

  • A. Grudge attack
  • B. Intelligence attack
  • C. Business attack
  • D. Financial attack

正解:C

解説:
Explanation/Reference:
Business attacks concern information loss through competitive intelligence gathering and computer-related attacks. These attacks can be very costly due the loss of trade secrets and reputation.
Intelligence attacks are aimed at sensitive military and law enforcement files containing military data and investigation reports.
Financial attacks are concerned with frauds to banks and large corporations.
Grudge attacks are targeted at individuals and companies who have done something that the attacker doesn't like.
The CISSP for Dummies book has nice coverage of the different types of attacks, here is an extract:
Terrorism Attacks
Terrorism exists at many levels on the Internet. In April 2001, during a period of tense relations between China and the U.S. (resulting from the crash landing of a U.S. Navy reconnaissance plane on Hainan Island), Chinese hackers ( cyberterrorists ) launched a major effort to disrupt critical U.S. infrastructure, which included U.S. government and military systems.
Following the terrorist attacks against the U.S. on September 11, 2001, the general public became painfully aware of the extent of terrorism on the Internet. Terrorist organizations and cells are using online capabilities to coordinate attacks, transfer funds, harm international commerce, disrupt critical systems, disseminate propaganda, and gain useful information about developing techniques and instruments of terror, including nuclear , biological, and chemical weapons.
Military and intelligence attacks
Military and intelligence attacks are perpetrated by criminals, traitors, or foreign intelligence agents seeking classified law enforcement or military information. Such attacks may also be carried out by governments during times of war and conflict.
Financial attacks
Banks, large corporations, and e-commerce sites are the targets of financial attacks, all of which are motivated by greed. Financial attacks may seek to steal or embezzle funds, gain access to online financial information, extort individuals or businesses, or obtain the personal credit card numbers of customers.
Business attacks
Businesses are becoming the targets of more and more computer and Internet attacks. These attacks include competitive intelligence gathering, denial of service, and other computer- related attacks.
Businesses are often targeted for several reasons including
Lack of expertise: Despite heightened security awareness, a shortage of qualified security professionals still exists, particularly in private enterprise.
Lack of resources: Businesses often lack the resources to prevent, or even detect, attacks against their systems.
Lack of reporting or prosecution : Because of public relations concerns and the inability to prosecute computer criminals due to either a lack of evidence or a lack of properly handled evidence, the majority of business attacks still go unreported.
The cost to businesses can be significant, including loss of trade secrets or proprietary information, loss of revenue, and loss of reputation.
Grudge attacks
Grudge attacks are targeted at individuals or businesses and are motivated by a desire to take revenge against a person or organization. A disgruntled employee, for example, may steal trade secrets, delete valuable data, or plant a logic bomb in a critical system or application.
Fortunately, these attacks (at least in the case of a disgruntled employee) can be easier to prevent or prosecute than many other types of attacks because:
The attacker is often known to the victim.
The attack has a visible impact that produces a viable evidence trail.
Most businesses (already sensitive to the possibility of wrongful termination suits ) have well-established termination procedures
"Fun" attacks
"Fun" attacks are perpetrated by thrill seekers and script kiddies who are motivated by curiosity or excitement. Although these attackers may not intend to do any harm or use any of the information that they access, they're still dangerous and their activities are still illegal.
These attacks can also be relatively easy to detect and prosecute. Because the perpetrators are often script kiddies or otherwise inexperienced hackers, they may not know how to cover their tracks effectively.
Also, because no real harm is normally done nor intended against the system, it may be tempting (although ill advised) for a business to prosecute the individual and put a positive public relations spin on the incident. You've seen the film at 11: "We quickly detected the attack, prevented any harm to our network, and prosecuted the responsible individual; our security is unbreakable !" Such action, however, will likely motivate others to launch a more serious and concerted grudge attack against the business.
Many computer criminals in this category only seek notoriety. Although it's one thing to brag to a small circle of friends about defacing a public Web site, the wily hacker who appears on CNN reaches the next level of hacker celebrity-dom. These twisted individuals want to be caught to revel in their 15 minutes of fame.
References:
ANDRESS, Mandy, Exam Cram CISSP, Coriolis, 2001, Chapter 10: Law, Investigation, and Ethics (page
187)
and
CISSP Professional Study Guide by James Michael Stewart, Ed Tittel, Mike Chapple, page 607-609 and
CISSP for Dummies, Miller L. H. and Gregory P. H. ISBN: 0470537914, page 309-311


質問 # 178
What is considered the most important type of error to avoid for a biometric access control system?

  • A. Type I Error
  • B. Combined Error Rate
  • C. Type II Error
  • D. Crossover Error Rate

正解:C

解説:
Section: Access Control
Explanation/Reference:
When a biometric system is used for access control, the most important error is the false accept or false acceptance rate, or Type II error, where the system would accept an impostor.
A Type I error is known as the false reject or false rejection rate and is not as important in the security context as a type II error rate. A type one is when a valid company employee is rejected by the system and he cannot get access even thou it is a valid user.
The Crossover Error Rate (CER) is the point at which the false rejection rate equals the false acceptance rate if your would create a graph of Type I and Type II errors. The lower the CER the better the device would be.
The Combined Error Rate is a distracter and does not exist.
Source: TIPTON, Harold F. & KRAUSE, Micki, Information Security Management Handbook, 4th edition (volume 1), 2000, CRC Press, Chapter 1, Biometric Identification (page 10).


質問 # 179
Which OSI/ISO layer does a SOCKS server operate at?

  • A. Transport layer
  • B. Data link layer
  • C. Network layer
  • D. Session layer

正解:D

解説:
A SOCKS based server operates at the Session layer of the OSI model.
SOCKS is an Internet protocol that allows client-server applications to transparently use the services of a network firewall. SOCKS is an abbreviation for "SOCKetS". As of Version 5 of SOCK, both UDP and TCP is supported.
One of the best known circuit-level proxies is SOCKS proxy server. The basic purpose of the protocol is to enable hosts on one side of a SOCKS server to gain access to hosts on the other side of a SOCKS Server, without requiring direct "IP-reachability" The protocol was originally developed by David Koblas, a system administrator of MIPS Computer Systems. After MIPS was taken over by Silicon Graphics in 1992, Koblas presented a paper on SOCKS at that year's Usenix Security Symposium and SOCKS became publicly available. The protocol was extended to version 4 by Ying-Da Lee of NEC.
SOCKS includes two components, the SOCKS server and the SOCKS client.
The SOCKS protocol performs four functions:
Making connection requests
Setting up proxy circuits
Relaying application data
Performing user authentication (optional)


質問 # 180
A momentary low voltage, from 1 cycle to a few seconds, is a:

  • A. sag
  • B. blackout
  • C. fault
  • D. spike

正解:A

解説:
A momentary low voltage is a sag. A synonym would be a dip.
Risks to electrical power supply:
POWER FAILURE
Blackout: complete loss of electrical power Fault: momentary power outage
POWER DEGRADATION
Brownout: an intentional reduction of voltage by the power company. Sag/dip: a short period of low voltage
POWER EXCESS
Surge: Prolonged rise in voltage Spike: Momentary High Voltage In-rush current: the initial surge of current required by a load before it reaches normal operation.
- Transient: line noise or disturbance is superimposed on the supply circuit and can cause fluctuations in electrical power
Refence(s) used for this question:
Harris, Shon (2012-10-25). CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 6th Edition (p. 462). McGraw-
Hill. Kindle Edition.


質問 # 181
......

有効な学習方法でISCのSSCP試験をパス:https://jp.fast2test.com/SSCP-premium-file.html


弊社を連絡する

我々は12時間以内ですべてのお問い合わせを答えます。

我々の働いている時間: ( GMT 0:00-15:00 )
月曜日から土曜日まで

サポート: 現在連絡 

English Deutsch 繁体中文 한국어